9th June 2003
Don Justo's Self-Built Cathedral
metaphoric learnings for contemporary alternative initiatives
- / -
Much may be learnt about the potential and frustrations of alternative initiatives
from the undertaking of Justo Gallego Martínez (now well over 70). In 1961,
at the age of 29, he laid the first stone in the construction of a "cathedral"
that he has built virtually single handed since then on a plot of land 50 metres
by 20 metres that he inherited from his parents. It has been rated by some as
perhaps the strangest building in the world. His undertaking in giving form
to a dream has been celebrated in several documentary films, by journalists,
and treated as an inspiration by architects and religious groups.
This is no "model" cathedral and he is neither a qualified architect,
nor engineer, nor bricklayer -- he is a farmer. "The plans have only ever
existed in my head" and have evolved over time in response to opportunity
and inspiration. Nor does he have formal planning permission from the authorities
of Mejorada del Campo -- the town in which it is located (20 km from Madrid
under the flight-path to the Barajas airport). Nor does he have the benediction
or support of the Catholic Church. After eight years in a Trappist order --
and just prior to taking his vows -- he was obliged to leave, considerably weakened
by tuberculosis and the monastic regime. His cathedral is dedicated to Nuestra
Señora del Pilar, Madre de Jesús. He explains: "It's an act of faith." The cathedral
has been bequeathed by him to the Bishopric of nearby Alcalá de Henares.
The shell of the building is complete -- covering the 20x50 metre plot [photos].
Some 8,000m2 have been built -- or are underway. They include a complex
ensemble of cloisters, offices, lodgings and a library. The cathedral already
has a dome (modelled on St Peters) rising to some 40 metres, some 12 metres
in diametre -- whose steel girders were raised with the aid of his six nephews
using pulleys. He was unable to get the loan of a crane. In summer volunteers
may lend a hand, but for the heavy work he hires a local assistant at his own
expense. It is estimated that it may take another 15 to 20 years to complete
-- although Don Justo does not know. He prefers not to speak about the future.
How long he will still be physically able to continue working on it is uncertain.
The mayor of Mejorada del Campo declares that to date not one architect or
builder has been prepared to take responsibility for this building. Questions
are raised concerning its foundations and bracings, and nobody wants to be responsible
for its structural integrity. Given its problematic status, the lack of official
support, and the value of the land on which it is located, Don Justo is aware
that there is every possibility that the cathedral may be razed to the ground
immediately after his death.
He has financed his work by rent from some inherited farmland -- some of which
he has already sold. Donations from supporters and visitors are welcomed. Most
of the construction materials used are recycled (buckets, pieces of wood, plastic
tubes, etc) -- occasionally obtained from business and construction companies
with excess materials for a job. Progress on the cathedral is therefore visibly
marked by the nature and quality of materials that he acquires in this way.
The columns are moulded using old petrol drums, the window arches carry the
marks of the tires they were moulded in and bicycle wheels have been used as
pulleys. Strength is ensured by using extra quantities of cement. There has
as yet been little time for finishing surfaces. The rose window is without glass
-- but there is a long mosaic staircase leading to the main entrance.
Model for understanding alternative initiatives
Don Justo's Cathedral
||Monument to the human spirit and its capacity to transcend
ordinary constraints and limitations in the most improbable way. Its symbolism
is that much greater because it is the act of a very ordinary hero -- whose
genius lay in his persistence.
||Many alternative initiatives can be usefully interpreted in
the light of their symbolic significance, as an inspiration to others in
a world which "inspiration" is often only recognized because of
its short-term economic or political significance. Such initiatives speak
to the many who have their own dream of "constructing a cathedral"
The meaning may lie above all in the intentionality and the process of
implementation rather than in the end result (as with McLuhan, the undertaking
is the message). In this sense the cathedral is already "complete",
and will continue to "exist", whatever its fate
|It is too easily forgotten that for those engaging in alternative
initiatives, outside the mainstream, the value may lie in the process and
the exploration of the dream rather than in the concrete result on which
some others may choose to judge them.
||The cathedral is above all a demonstration in how to implement
a dream, however little wider support there is for doing so.
||Officially much is now made of identifying "processes
that work". Many alternatives survive, and take concrete form, through
a kind of existential struggle that goes far beyond the technicalities of
what appears in models and manuals.
||Significantly his undertaking has been treated as meaningless
both by those in his immediate community (who laughed at him as 'el loco
de la iglesia') and by the secular and religious authorities. But if
Don Justo is to be framed as "loco", what price "sanity"
in today's world?
||Unfortunately alternatives to mainstream initiatives are of
necessity perceived as meaningless -- and their proponents are typically
framed as a laughing-stock. This is the strikingly dangerous weakness of
mainstream thinking unable to see creatively beyond its own inherited patterns.
This is ironic at a time when officialdom is increasingly being asked to
come up with "new thinking" to meet intractable challenges. However
it is unclear what criteria this thinking would be recognizable by those
concerned? Perhaps a test should be developed for the capacity to recognize
||In a world in which the mind is increasingly
dominated by the soulless realities of urban planning and their organizational
equivalents, the enterprise and what has been achieved are a celebration
of surrealism worthy of the greatest exponents of that art form -- in the
best Spanish tradition of Antoni Gaudi, Salvador Dali and Don Quichote.
It is especially surreal, as with certain forms of art, in that construction
continues despite its probable fate.
In exploring new realms of fundamental physics and cosmology a much cited
quote recognizes that there may well be agreement on whether a new theory
is crazy. The concern expressed is whether it is crazy enough to have
a chance of being correct. When a great innovation appears, it will almost
certainly be in a muddled, incomplete and confusing form. To the discoverer,
himself, it will be only half understood; to everyone else, it will be
a mystery. For any speculation which does not at first glance look crazy,
there is no hope! (Brower)
||Don Justo's has achieved no official recognition, despite
the attention accorded him by documentary film makers, journalists and tourists.
||Failure to accord official recognition to alternative forms
of social organization is typical of the strategic trap in which official
institutions and initiatives find themselves in their desperate search for
policies capable of responding to the challenges of society. It is curious
how little such recognition would cost in comparison to the amounts expended
on complex public relations exercises using media stars who in no way represent
the insights and qualities of those who actually engage in giving form to
||There is a strange contrast to the world publicity surrounding
brief sporting achievements (solo round-the-world yachting / ballooning,
trekking to the poles, etc) from which people may have to be dramatically
rescued at great expense. Why is it that Don Justo's cathedral does not
appear in the Guiness Book of Records under a category "largest
building constructed by a single individual"?
||It is curious that the brief undertakings of those who engage
in adventures against the elements appeal so much more to public opinion,
the media and consequently their sponsors. And where there is an alternative
media, the actions of isolated individuals like Don Justo are themselves
perceived as "eccentric" and meaningless in comparison with those
undertaking other kinds of "social" alternative initiative considered
more appropriate -- replicating the selective pattern of the mainstream
trap and failing to recognize what inspires the human spirit.
||The enterprise is clearly an administrative embarrassment
to the civil authority of a very minor town that has no other attractions
of national, regional or international significance. It is tolerated because
action against it would arouse more embarrassment -- but support of any
other kind is withheld. Delicate issues are presumably associated with Don
Justo's social security status and medical coverage -- "I have never
had an accident". One commentator indicated that he leaps along his
wobbly scaffolding from section to section belying his age (in a way that
would make any building inspector blanch)
||How do local, national, regional and international authorities
respond to alternative initiatives? Why do they have such difficulty in
engaging with people who do not dialogue with them suitably dressed, over
expense account restaurant meals, and in response to a program and budget
framework established by the best expertise that money can buy in the light
of realistic realistic political priorities? Is there no recognition that
the failure of the projects that emerge from such processes calls for careful
attention to others that may succeed despite such support? How can projects
be supported when they are in defiance of safety and other regulations?
||The construction is clearly in defiance of any normal planning
procedure, but has successfully exploited a fragile window of opportunity
-- prior to any attempt to use it as a building for wider public use. It
awaits the planner's revenge! Typically planners have not been able to respond
proactively to such initiatives -- especially when they are now surrounded
by blocks of modern apartments.
||Much is made by aid agencies of the formal planning and reporting
procedures through which projects are evaluated, monitored and approved
for funding. Such procedures may even be deliberately used to trap those
engaging in alternative projects into wasting resources on completing them
correctly -- in competition with others who specialize in procedurally-oriented
||The construction has necessarily failed to seek to conform
to the myriad basic building codes and regulations. Questions will necessarily
be raised regarding its safety as a public building. Typically no efforts
have been made to provide minimal assistance to ensure such conformity
||It has become evident that developed countries function within
what has increasingly become a regulatory "gated community" --
despite the manner in which those outside such a community are obliged (if
they are to survive) to innovate in ways that infringe regulatory and safety
codes. This is most evident in developing countries obliged to take risks
in recycling and adapting scarce materials and equipment. It is liable to
become more evident amongst the poor in industrialized countries without
the resources to act in conformity with codes designed for those with resources.
||The work has not received the benediction of the Catholic
hierarchy, despite its initiator's former affiliation through a Trappist
order. The initiative is indeed an embarrassment -- increased by the fact
that it will become Church property on the death of Don Justo. The bishopric
claims "not to need a second cathedral" -- forgetting that people
around the world will tend only to hear and be impressed by Don Justo's
efforts outside the worn pattern of raising funds for religious edifices.
Although it is indeed the case that a "cathedral" is the seat
of the bishop -- so there cannot be two. It is probable that the Church
will see the merit of razing the building -- after a suitable period of
neglect -- and selling the lands in order to fund restoration of its other
buildings. The Church has permitted only one mass to be celebrated therein
in 40 years.
||Typically religious authorities have the greatest of difficulty
endorsing projects that do not emerge directly from their dogma or are not
directly reinforcing of it. Their challenge, whatever their faith, is to
recognize the variety of expressions and aspirations of the human spirit
towards transcendental meaning -- beyond those associated with their own
dogmatic frameworks. The challenge is most evident in providing authoritative
recognition of "miracles". As with "new thinking", perhaps
there is sa similar challenge in recognizing "social miracles".
||From an architectural perspective, the cathedral has much
to be admired as the work of a single artist -- and has been duly celebrated
as such by both architects and artists. Yet it would appear that little
assistance has been forthcoming from either profession. Don Justo has emulated
the simplicities of the Romanesque style (Gothic being "too complicated"
for his skills and Baroque "does not please me")
||It is extraordinary that it is often artists and architects
who are capable of seeing alternative initiatives with a new eye -- where
others focus on functionality and other dimensions that do not necessarily
sustain the human spirit in refreshing ways. At the Findhorn (Scotland)
community it was the adaptation of a whisky
vat as a dwelling that struck the imagination of architects. And it
was only official recognition of the the extensive aesthetic innovation
that prevented the Damanhur (Italy)
temple complex from being destroyed by civil authorities enraged by the
absence of planning permission. Perhaps a greater role should be sought
from architects and artists in providing bridging legitimatation for alternative
projects to mainstream authorities.
||Despite official indifference, the cathedral has been noted
in offbeat tourist guides -- and is spoken of with admiration by Madrid
taxi drivers. It is a wonder that the local and national tourist authorities
do not take active steps to exploit an enterprise of such intrinsic significance
-- and so convenient to the airport. Such economic exploitation might usefully
have been accompanied by small efforts to facilitate its completion.
||Alternative initiatives increasingly provide a focus for jaded
tourists over-exposed to sites of very modest comparative interest. This
is the case with the Centre for Alternative Technology (Wales), Arcosanti
(Arizona), Auroville (Pondicherry), etc. Perhaps tourist authorities (especially
in areas of otherwise limited interest) should do more to identify and position
such sites -- rather than wait hundreds of years for their significance
to become apparent.
||The construction has been undertaken with no official funding
and with only incidental and voluntary donations of time and materials from
well-wishers. This is most curious in a Europe that is proud of its cultural
achievements and expends disproportionate amounts of official funding on
events and monuments that are far from demonstrating the dedication and
achievement of those such as Don Justo -- especially as an inspiration to
young people. It is perhaps also curious that no device could be found to
facilitate the process whereby others could provide financial assistance
to the enterprise. However Don Justo's achievement is above all a demonstration
of how much can be achieved without the kinds of funding typically considered
as absolutely essential to any new initiative.
||The manner in which alternative initiatives acquire funds
is an embarrassment in a society that claims to favour empowering progressive
and imaginative undertakings -- especially those that call for only modest
support (possibly more in kind than in cash). Why is it that public funds,
especially at the level of the European Community, are only effectively
available for the kinds of project promoted by those already with funds
-- and the patience to indulge in bureaucratic and political game-playing?
Why do authorities not systematically seek out projects worthy of funding
and help structure their funding requests -- as is done in by-passing procedures
for projects specially favoured by those that control allocation of such
funds? Is there not a case for recognizing how projects can even be encouraged
and sustained by minimum or "zero funding"? A Grameem Bank for
||Ironically the cathedral is located in a commune with a communist
mayor -- somewhat obliged to recognize the merits of such an enterprise.
But the cathedral can be seen as a political statement that challenges the
inflexibilities of prevailing authority -- making evident values that transcend
those of the mundane world. It can be understood as a personal political
statement -- through the switch in priorities of a minor local land owner.
||Alternatives of any kind are typically perceived as a political
threat by mainstream authorities -- a direct challenge to their authority
and their comprehension of the strategic opportunities and priorities. There
is a strong case for exploring such dysfunctional insecurity to enable the
emergence of alternatives to be perceived in a new and more favourable light
-- beyond the token recognition accorded to them.
||It is difficult to imagine a more concrete demonstration --
sustained over 40 years -- of the capacity to switch to an alternative livelihood,
to use of recycled resources, and to change patterns of consumption. Although
Don Justo is now taken more seriously he says: "From the very start
I've known I could only depend on myself." Why would this initiative
not attract the attention of those such as the Right
||Few well-funded "sustainable initiatives" survive
more than a few years. What does it take to engage in a long-term alternative
initiative from within a community and without being dependent on public
funds? How can the sustainability of alternative initiatives be ensured?
How dependent are the evaluators of such possibilities on precedents to
reassure them in their judgement? Does this imply that no truly original
initiative can be supported -- if only as an experiment? Is there a sense
in which sustainability has to be appropriately "authorized"?
||The cathedral is a transparent demonstration of the ability
to make successful and creative use of recycled resources in ways that provide
learnings for other initiatives -- both in Europe and in developing regions.
Should it be a worthy nominee for the International
Design Resource Award?
||The recycling abilities, of which Don Justo is an exemplar,
are likely to become of even greater significance in the future. An articulation
of the relevant arguments is provided by Louis le Roy -- ironically with
respect to his own long-term Eco-Cathedral
project (Mildam, Netherlands).
||Don Justo is in his own lifestyle a demonstration
of the kind of modesty that is extolled in campaigns regarding alternative
patterns of consumption -- if only in his vegetarianism. He condemns the
superficiality of our time and its materialism -- and acts on his belief.
||What is it that makes a sustainable lifestyle
meaningful and sustainable as such? Why has it proven so difficult to communicate
its attractiveness through official channels and to young people? How to
respond to the temptation of second generation members of sustainable communities
to move out into the wider unsustainable world? How many "Don Justos"
does it take to transform the quality of a community?
||Don Justo's lifestyle offers learnings with respect
to alternative approaches to meaningful employment -- exemplifying the old
adage with regard to whether one frames one's current activity as "laying
bricks", "building a wall" or "building a cathedral".
Over 40 years he developed a pattern of working for 10 hours a day without
lunch -- a real challenge for the labour unions!
||With the shifting nature of employment and the
increasing proportion of "unemployment" or partial employment,
what is to be learnt from the patterns of activity exemplified by Don Justo
-- and his ability to find meaning in them?
Although Don Justo's achievement is magnificent from many perspectives,
it is what it is. It would be easy to to see it only as a poorly constructed
edifice -- the folly of a lifetime -- for which the wider community has
little need. The many aspects of its construction that can be criticized
are also a reflection of weaknesses in its justification as an enterprise.
|Claims made for the value and significance of alternative
intiatives may often be seen as overstated. It may be argued that they fulfil
many criteria of sustainability but their weaknesses are indeed only too
easily neglected. Much that is appreciated may lie in the eye of the beholder
-- as with their failings. But such may also be the case with what are extolled
as the achievements of mainstream society.
Given the following initiatives:
- Don Justo's initiative in constructing from recycled materials the Catedral
de Nuestra Señora del Pilar, Madre de Jesús (Mejorada del Campo, Spain) without
the benediction of the Catholic Church
- Construction of an "eco-cathedral" with a 50 metre nave by the
Anglican Church of the Province of South Africa (Kokstad) [more]
- Creation in 2002 of a Network of Earthkeeping
Christian Communities in South Africa (NECCSA) of which the first group
member was the Dutch Reformed Church. The website of the group provides extensive
- Construction over a period of 30 years, by Lous Le Roy in Mildam (Netherlands),
of an "eco-cathedral" -- with the collaboration of the municipality
who provided 1500 truckloads of residual materials from road construction.
Le Roy processed this material by hand (without any outside assistance) into
assorted structures, low walls, pathways and towers that due to their ingenious
construction could serve as purification plants for acid rain. [more;
- Recognition of the merit of Le Roy's approach in other countries of Europe,
notably Germany and Switzerland
- Broader concerns by religious groups with the spiritual significance of
the natural heritage and the Earth as a "church" or "temple"
These concerns extend into preoccupations with the Earth wisdom spirituality.
- Creation and clustering of ecosteries as "loved places where ecological
values, knowledge and wisdom are learned, practiced and shared" as sacred,
respected and honored dwelling places. "Ecostery" is from "ecos," the ancient
Greek word for household extended here to include home, neighborhood and ecological
community. "Stery" comes from "monastery," a place where people live by rules
of devotion and respect. Its members share the same values, and work together
to live a complete, sacred life here and now. Ecostery principles and values
are oriented toward harmony with nature [more]
- A much older tradition has ensured the construction of sacred gardens in
association with temples (notably in India and Japan), with an estimated 25,000
sacred groves and other sanctified ecosystems in Rajasthan alone [more;
These disparate initiatives help in different ways to provide transcendental
insight into the mundane processes of recycling in a material world. Perhaps
there is a case for creating some form of "Global Eco-cathedral Network"
to recognize and support such initiatives. Like the Global
Eco-village Network (with which NECCSA is associated) it might help to support
similar projects in developing countries where buildings become feasible to
the extent that they can use recycled materials.
The challenge is whether any such initiative could bridge across the diversity
of belief systems that inspire those that engage in them. Clearly the notion
of "eco-cathedral" might already be considered a provocation to those
of non-Christian persuasion, whereas "eco" is a provocation to those
whose focus is on the spiritual and who consider that ecological and recycling
issues are incidental. Those focused on natural ecosystems may have little interest
in preoccupations with recycling, and vice versa. Any "network" relating
them all would also need to be understood as a conceptual (or mind-map) network
that could show the degree of relevance of one to the other -- and the distances
But it is perhaps the long-term individual initiatives, such as those of Don
Justo and Louis Le Roy, that is most striking in comparison with those of communities.
Le Catedral de Don Justo: el milagro del persistencia [text]
Gente Diferente: Justo Gallego Martínez [text]
Eulogio Reguillo. Catedral de Justo. [photos]
Peter Moers und Jörg Daniel Hissen. Die Baustelle des Herrn [text]
Kees van der Hoeven. Don Justo? BladNA  4. Kavander
Es gilt, ein Gelübde einzulösen: Der Dombauer von Mejorado. Bayerischer
Rundfunk | Euroblick vom 12.01.2003 [text]
Thomas Marschler. Der Prophet. Predigt zum 2. Adventsonntag. Pfarrgemeinde
St. Johann Baptist in Wuppertal [text]
El Madrid de los Curiosos: La catedral de Justo, monumento al
esfuerzo de un solo hombre. El Mundo, 24 de julio de 1998 [text]
Sr Justo's Cathedral. Spain a Live [text]
Films about Don Justo
Javier Baudoin. Catedral. Film. 1997 [description]
Peter Moers und Jörg Daniel Hissen. Die Baustelle des Herrn. Film 26 min. Deutschland
José Ramón Pedroza Sierra. El Labriego que creyó en Dios. Film. España y Escocia/2001/VHS/color/30