Towards a Language of Spiritual Concord
- / -
of Towards Transformative Conferencing and Dialogue: Collection of papers and notes, problems and possibilities on the new frontier of high-risk gatherings concerning social development
If the gathering is structured so that the value of a verbal or written contribution is
judged by its length or by its origin, then reference should be made to the many
gatherings that have gone this route. The weighty tomes gathering dust on library shelves
suggest the need for another approach.
Could the challenge of the gathering not be reformulated in terms of discovery of the
set of metaphors or images which best embody a higher understanding of spiritual concord
at this time? What is needed is an imaginative response to producing a kind of spiritual
"Rosetta stone", or spiritual "keystone". It is the spiritual
traditions which have made most effective use of metaphors in the past to convey the
subtlest of insights.
Can the contemporary spiritual challenge not be reformulated in terms of the
development of images, metaphors or parables to embody the harmonies and discords between
different spiritual insights? Culture is the principal resource in any such undertaking --
given the wealth of metaphor from the many arts.
Embodying insights by circumscription
Focus on such metaphors to carry subtle insight avoids the need for lengthy verbal
presentations using the specialized jargon of a particular tradition. The need is to share
insight and an "image is worth a thousand words".
The concern is with the subtlest insights into integrative experience. There is merit
in using metaphors which circumscribe such insights, alluding indirectly to the nature of
the experience. In contrast, efforts to describe or label such insights directly run the
risk of caricaturing them in the eyes of others. This severely inhibits concord based on
If participants are called upon to offer suitable metaphors to capture the collective
dilemma of spiritual concord, a new way forward may be explored. This is not an imposition
on those of spiritual background, since they regularly use such devices to communicate
understandings within their own tradition.
The request is to extend this skill to articulation of the relationship between
the seemingly incommensurable spiritual traditions assembled at the gathering. The
challenge is to discover "healing insights", namely to clarify in metaphoric
form the wholeness which articulates the relationship between different spiritual
For a Buddhist, for example, what are the metaphors or images which best clarify the
relationship between non-Buddhist groups holding different perspectives -- a mandala
perhaps? Can that image be usefully contrasted with that furnished by a Christian to
clarify the relationship between non-Christian groups -- a rose window perhaps? And can
this be challenged by an Islamic perception of a similar nature? etc.
Note how this approach avoids confrontation on points of difference. It calls for
setting the differences between others within an integrative framework which can be
understood as a whole -- preferably with a centre that is empty and open. Filling or
occupying the centre precludes others from comprehending the subtlest insights through
other possible frameworks, whether now or in the future. It is an assertion that the
integrative experience can only be engaged in through a single framework. It makes the
framework of greater importance than the fundamental integrative experience. This would
then be a form of "spiritual colonialism" that is repressive of alternative
This metaphoric approach recognizes that the challenge:
- For the group supplying the integrative metaphor, lies in the meditation on the
wholeness that keeps the pattern of differences intact. Quality lies in the pattern that
- For other groups "encompassed" in this way, lies in responding with their own
metaphors that embody a greater sense of harmony and a greater respect for difference.
Identity lies in contrast. Dialogue is assured through an exchange of perspectives.
Another metaphoric interaction could, for example, be based on the collaborative design
of a shared place of worship. As a collective "thought experiment", the
challenge for each tradition in making proposals is then to :
- Ensure the presence of those features that guarantee its status as a space that can be
held sacred by that tradition.
- Sacrifice those features which are not essential to the sacredness of that space, and
which are strong irritants to those of other traditions.
- Tolerate features from other traditions, perhaps adjusting their location, such that
these are only mild irritants to the sacredness of the space.
The collective art is to negotiate the design of the space, so that the aesthetic
creativity and compromises both reflects the sense of integration between the different
traditions and allows them to identify their own particular contribution to the overall
design. The design process is then a metaphor for the process of achieving spiritual
There are of course traps to be avoided. Metaphors and images that are helpful to some
are experienced as constraining and simplistic to others. More challenging is that, as
with cultural artefacts, people may appreciate or regret the quality of harmony or discord
emphasized in a particular metaphor. There are some whose need for harmony is considered
unrealistic and unmeaningful by others.
However, since the subtlety of the concord that is sought must necessarily transcend
any articulation in a single metaphor, the challenge is to discover a set of complementary
metaphors which together better embody that overarching insight. Perhaps the spiritual art
to be discovered is that of dancing between the insights offered by such metaphors.
A metaphoric example: an ecology of spiritual insights
Using the ecological metaphor, for example, one may ask how each spiritual tradition
fits into the spiritual ecosystem. What vital role does each spiritual tradition perform
within that ecosystem?
Note that this is not an exercise in syncretism. Rather it is a recognition that there
are people who, for whatever cultural or psycho-social reason, derive benefit from one
pattern of spiritual insights rather than from another. However, there are other people
who derive benefit from other patterns of insights.
And just as the artefacts of different cultures may be appreciated by some, under
certain conditions an individual may articulate his or her spiritual understanding from
different patterns of spiritual insights. For the integrity of the person, there must be
some insight into ways of articulating the relationship between apparently conflicting