Critical Factors for the Long-term Survival
to the Humanity 3000 Symposium (Seattle, 2000)
- / -
What are the factors that are most critical
to the long term survival of humanity?
Development of a language and mode of dialogue appropriate
to working collectively with the ecology of fundamental differences characteristic
of real social and individual relationships, rather than dependent upon superficial
reconciliation and reduction of complexity. This implies giving content to that
which cannot be effectively named.
Development of the ability to integrate the polarized modes of understanding
promoting fragmentation so as to engender a new kind of cognitively global framework
that both justifies such polarization at one level and sustain a more comprehensive,
if paradoxical, form of understanding at another. This implies a shift from
either/or to both/and (of most significance with respect to ownership
Reduction in dependency on relatively simplistic, selective,
and often impoverished, metaphors underlying the models through which individuals,
communities, humanity and the environment are readily defined, notably for policy
purposes but also as a basis for any sense of identity and fulfilment.
Development of a proactive approach, integrating, rather than
excluding, unwelcome phenomena (of the "shadow" of humanity) -- taking account
of processes of denial, the functional truths associated with such phenomena,
and the ever-present "obsolete" understandings associated with educational or
historical phases and with the challenges to acquiring and using the latest
Development beyond expectation of universal consensus on single-factor
explanations, or on a single paradigm, (global) plan, charter, vision, strategy
or (licensed) model -- towards collective use of an "ecology" of such knowledge
Development of social and cognitive experiments, equivalent
to those in science and technology, in order to explore new community contexts
capable of containing the richer dynamics of multi-cultural societies.
Development of fulfilling ways of living more simply in the
present rather than depending on technology as a source of stimulus and meaningful
What are the current map and trajectory
of these factors?
Whilst there is acknowledgement of the significance of these
factors within certain constituencies, there are major trends that effectively
obscure them. Thus there is a widespread, misguided belief in the adequacy of
existing language - whether that of a particular discipline or of English as
a "universal" language -- to articulate the insights necessary for global transformation.
Innovation in dialogue processes is simplistic and culture-bound in comparison
with technological innovation. Major initiatives continue to be based on the
assumption that a single global plan, charter, strategy or explanation can be
articulated in response to the crises of humanity. There is little ability to
handle fundamental disagreement and honour it within new initiatives. Such denial
extends beyond disagreement itself to any problematic situations, involving
a widespread desire to restrict attention to positive information and to design
out negative feedback. Social experiment, in contrast to that of technology
or commerce, is effectively inhibited and marginalized as dangerous (and often
associated with eccentric sects). Exploration of more meaningful quality of
life, with a smaller environmental footprint, is framed as quaint and unrealistic.
What are the problems and opportunities with the factors
Problems: The factors identified focus on intangibles in a
situation in which it is tangibles that appear to call for the most immediate
action. Furthermore it is primarily on tangibles that governments, commerce
and university research are most prepared to focus in order to sustain their
legitimacy. In each case demonstrable success in the short-term is required,
even if this has little useful impact on long-term challenges.
Opportunities: The many pleas for "new thinking" indicate that the limitations
of the traditional approach on tangibles are increasingly recognized. Furthermore
the low costs of work on intangibles and the degrees of freedom implicit in
this emphasis, indicate that many can and will explore the opportunities of
such factors without being dependent on major institutional support. Notably
in the knowledge industry, it has been recognized that the values of the future
will primarily be associated with intangibles. Mathematics has much to offer
in articulating possibilities currently framed in terms of two-dimensional solutions
(notably in relation to territorial disputes).
in Your Field: What do you envision as the greatest
potential/future in your field in the 1000 year future?
Metaphoric innovation. Increasingly individuals, groups and
societies will identify or design new metaphors to articulate subtler and more
comprehensive forms of understanding that will offer them strategic advantages
in navigating a complex environment. Some of these will draw on traditional
knowledge or the environment itself. In search of helpful metaphors, others
will "mine" the knowledge originally generated by the many disciplines. Already
metaphoric innovation is recognized as a key to software and technological development.
[Note that with respect to the above question, such innovation would transcend
the restriction to the "sight" metaphor implied by "envision", or to the agricultural
metaphor implied by "field"]
Discussion Topics/Questions: What are two or three topics/questions
critical to the long-term future that you wish to explore in small group settings?
What are the most restrictive metaphors
in current usage (notably by the international community) that inhibit social
transformation and successful policy-making and what fruitful alternatives might
How can "nasty questions", evoking denial
and negative feedback, be more fruitfully addressed through dialogue processes
- avoiding the tunnel vision of single-factor approaches?
How might it be possible to replicate and
position the experimental method of science and technology (research and development)
with respect to social, community and life-style innovation relevant to meaningful
quality of life in the future? Or are new methods required?
1000 Year Vision: Please
articulate your vision of the 1000 year future in a 3-5 line statement
Cognitive innovation. For the individual (associated with one
or more communities) this will imply considerable variation in sense of identity,
and relationship to reality (or to any "other"). Coherence will be
experienced through dynamic processes rather than static frameworks, challenging
present legislative and governance procedures. Aesthetic factors will be vital
to knowledge organization and comprehension and dissemination of meaningful
strategies -- charters will be sing-able and benefit from the theory of musical
harmony. ["Sound", "Smell", "Taste" and "Touch"
will be as significant as "Vision" in articulating the future!]