Gardening Sustainable Psycommunities
Recognizing the psycho-social integrities of the future
- / -
Report on the international conference on 'Eco-villages and
Sustainable Communities: models for 21st Century living' (Findhorn, October
1995) organized under the auspices of UNESCO
and with the support of the Gaia Trust. Also distributed under the title: Cultivating
There has long been grassroots interest in the formation of eco-villages and
sustainable communities -- partly as a further development of experimentation with
intentional communities. Internationally the United Nations Conference on Environment and
Development (Rio de Janeiro, 1992) placed an emphasis on 'sustainable
communities' and embodied strategies in support of them into Agenda 21 -- now being
adapted by local authorities in many countries. There is an international conference
series on eco-cities.
In October 1995 some 350 people from over 40 countries gathered at the Findhorn
Foundation (Scotland) for a conference to clarify these concerns and explore opportunities
for the future. Many participants represented existing communities and eco-villages from
around the world. Since its foundation in 1962, the Findhorn Foundation has itself become
internationally known for its experimentation with new models for holistic and sustainable
living. A specific intention was to provide support for such initiatives through a Global
The Findhorn conference was recognized as a preparation for the United Nations Habitat
Conference (Istanbul, June 1996).
Confusion of definitions
Much effort can be devoted to establishing definitions of different types of
'community' and their respective degrees of sustainability. The term community
alone is used in a confusing variety of ways: neighbourhood community, religious
community, economic community, scientific community, intelligence community, etc. Stress
may be placed on particular dimensions: residential community, community of discourse,
business community, intentional community, ethnic community, traditional community,
Internet community, international community, NGO community, etc. Emphasis may be placed on
the built environment, notably housing, as a way of giving new meaning to what may
otherwise be termed 'human settlements'. At the other extreme, emphasis may be
placed on the spirit of community binding groups of people together within the human
Similar confusion is associated with the use of the term 'sustainable'. It
may simply substitute for 'economically viable', even for a short period, or for
'socially viable' in other contexts. It may stress the conservation of non-
renewable resources, possibly in response to the envisaged needs of many future
generations. Businesses, and even nations, may strive for 'sustainable competitive
advantage'. The focus may emphasize preventing further damage to the environment, or
may be extended to include measures to restore the natural environment to a healthier
state. Sustainable may simply be used as a euphemism for endurance.
Eco-village communities can be understood as human ecologies that are sustainable:
spiritually, culturally, economically and ecologically. For some they are 'human
scale, full- featured settlements in which human activities are harmlessly integrated into
the natural world in a way that is supportive of human development and can successfully
continue into the indefinite future' (Context Institute, Eco-Villages and
Sustainable Communities, 1991). Healing the Earth and healing the human spirit may be
understood as one and the same thing (Jonathon Porritt, Save the Earth). In practice
however, different initiatives may stress such dimensions to differing degree, and notably
by excluding non-residential forms (Bill Metcalf, From Utopian Dreaming to Communal
Conference breakthrough: consistency of process with thematic content
Many of the participants came in order to share innovations in building techniques and
bio-technologies. Many were skilled in permaculture as exemplifying sustainable small-
scale agriculture. Some were part of the international network concerned with eco-cities.
Many came from communities that considered themselves eco-villages, or aspired to this
The most remarkable feature of the event was the manner in which such understandings
were adapted, for the first time, to provide a new approach to the organization of the
conference structure and process. The organizers and participants recogized the
limitations of the conventional conference format of presentations by speakers to plenary
sessions and workshops. This format might usefully be termed the 'missionary
position' in any Karma Sutra of speaker-audience intercourse (or 'gang
rape' in the case of a sequence of such speakers, where the process is designed to
avoid audience feedback). As with feminine criticism of insensitive intercourse, premature
withdrawal by speakers following dissemination of their message, accompanied by apologies
from the organizers concerning 'lack of time', reflects a primitive
understanding of possibilities yet to be described in a Joy of Congress.
The following sections describe various ways in which the conference was reframed in
the light of the thematic emphasis.
Conference as community
As with many conferences, the participants rapidly formed a community. More precisely,
this was composed of a variety of overlapping and interweaving sub-communities. Some pre-
dated the event, or had previously only taken the form of e-mail communities. Many
participants became members of several such sub-communities through different aspects of
their personalities (sub-personalities in the terms of transpersonal psychology).
The formation, dissolution, and re-formation, of sub- communities was deliberately
facilitated by innovative self- organizing processes during the course of the event.
Extensive behind-the-scenes use was made of computer techniques to enable people to
profile themselves and to modify such profiles during the event. This was deliberately
complemented by the psycho-social skills of a team of practitioners of what might be
called the 'salon hostess' role. This made it possible for participants to
identify fruitful interaction partners (and make arrangements to meet fruitfully), and for
new sub-communities to emerge in response to the pattern of communications during the
event. Emergence of micro-communities was skilfully enabled even at meals, in bus
journeys, walks and in the occasional queue.
The computer approach built on a technique developed by **** and used in meetings of
the European Commission. As part of this process, use was made of an hourly Participant
Viewsletter to circulate brief comments, questions, wit and wisdom, emanating from
individual participants and speakers (whether physically present or via the Internet). The
mixing and matching process was monitored and extensively facilitated behind-the-scenes by
a number of facilitators with appropriate psychological and group dynamic skills.
Inspired by the theme, great attention was given to ensuring that each participant
developed a sense of place and identity within the community -- a sense of psychic home-
space. The environmental architect Christopher Alexander (A Pattern Language, 1977)
best articulated this as that quality 'without a name' which makes a place
welcoming. Specialists in community, especially residential communities, frequently stress
the built environment as providing such a sense of place, to the exclusion of other less
tangible dimensions (which are assumed to be largely a consequence of physical design).
Increasingly however organizers of large conferences with a transpersonal dimension
recognize the value of developing a 'home group' for participants as a
counter-actant against any sense of isolation.
Internet has also demonstrated the value of non-physical places through which people
can gather -- to develop and sustain a sense of identity. This phenomenon is however
familiar to members of groups and associations, whether locally or internationally. Many
of these are valued as communities which may endure for decades, or even centuries, as in
the case of religious orders (eg Jesuits) and secret societies (eg freemasons).
Preoccupation with the built physical environment for community was thus transposed
during the conference into a preoccupation with the 'built' psycho-social
environment -- namely the formation of what were named for the first time as
'integrities' or 'psycommunities'. This transposition fruitfully
reframed many of the concerns of the builders and technologists -- and gave much valued
precision to some discussions about integrities and psycommunities. This was notably the
case with respect to psycho-social systems of insulation, heating, cooling, drainage and
recycling, and generation of power.***
Psycho-social permaculture: identifying the five kingdoms
A major achievement of the conference arose from adaptation of insights into
sustainable forms of agriculture as exemplified by permaculture. They key to this was
expressed by Peter Harper, a representative of the Centre for Alternative Technology:
'The way we organize our gardens reflects the way we organize our lives, our society,
our politics, our businesses and our knowledge' (Resurgence, 164). The
challenge was to use this insight to reframe understanding of the conference process as
exemplifying a sustainable community. Any failure to build a sustainable conference
community was seen as a failure to generate insights of relevance to the wider world.
Harper stressed that sustainable biological systems are composed of the five kingdoms:
protozoa, bacteria, fungi, plants and animals (see for example Lynn Margulis, Five
Kingdoms: an illustrated guide to the phyla of life on Earth). Of these some 90
percent by weight are plants, with animals (mainly insects and worms) constituting but a
few percent -- and serving mainly to decompose plants into forms that may be easily
recycled by fungi and bacteria. Without such decomposers the system would seize up, but,
as Harper notes, their work is viewed with 'distaste or even horror...This revulsion
is almost universal, but in another light can be seen as a projection of an infantile
refusal to face the realities of death and decay, or (as a species) to face honourably the
need to clean up after ourselves. This metaphor is starkly underlined by the basic fact
that most of the decomposition processes take place under the ground...But just as
the natural order would grind to a halt without its dark side, so would we: the dark side
suppressed raises demons and pathologies. There can be no growth without decay, no
resurrection without death.'
Applying such insights to the psycho-social system of a conference community, the five
kingdoms of sustainable natural systems were recognized as five complementary forms of
attention or engagement on the part of participants. This approach is consistent with some
the Eastern epistemologies of Buddhism and Taoism, with respect to hindrances to
understanding, practices for overcoming them, and the nature of the resulting insight. It
recognizes that the patterns of sustainable organization elaborated over millenia in
biological systems are likely to entrain (or necessitate) isomorphic pattern organization
in sustainable psycho-social systems. In this sense innovation is to a large extent a
question of giving conscious human expression to patterns long used unconsciously in
biological organization. Few patterns of organization have not already been exemplified in
nature. It is therefore useful to explore and work with those long-tested patterns, guided
by the ways that they are embodied in natural processes.
In experimenting with its own processes, the conference tentatively recognized
five forms of attention or engagement as:
- animal-type: essentially mobile consumers, performing predatory,
parasitical and commensal functions in relation to other forms of animal-type
attentions, extending to organization and use (including consumption) of plant-type
attentions, possibly important to their pollination or enabling their growth;
typically to be seen in the behaviours of "factions" and "lobbies" during
- plant-type: static, grounded, building on simple substances and energy,
refreshing the atmosphere, through the transformation of light, as a basis
for more evolved forms of life; typically to be seen as the sustaining participants
and forms of attention in a conference, embodying values and giving the conference
substance, coherence and much of the sustenance for the more complex processes
of factions and lobbies that are ultimately dependent on them as a source
- fungi-type: decomposing (through destructive, 'negative'
arguments?) those forms of action and interaction no longer sustained by life,
to enable new forms of attention and organization to emerge in a conference.
(cf Slime moulds!!)
- protista (protozoa, etc)-type: transforms very simple substances
(facts?, points?) into more complex forms (statements, recommendations ?)
through specialized functions (ad hoc task forces?) in a conference.
- monera (bacteria, etc)-type: the 'points' and 'counter-points'
made throughout any conference process, some of which may become an endemic
'infection' for more complex attention processes.
Fundamental to this approach was a sensitivity to the time dimension, notably in the
form of attention span. For an individual, psycho-social engagement of the shortest
duration takes the form of an immense number of virtually unconscious observations --
each, like the protozoa, a brief flash of life as a momentary vehicle for attention (which
the conference recognized as a form of 'nanopsychology'). Every human community
is of course characterized in part by this level of engagement. Some spiritual traditions
stress its fundamental importance through practices focussing on attention to the
At the other extreme, individual attention within any community may be held, shaped and
channelled over extended periods of time by belief systems. Like plants, these depend on
their ability to synthesize and give coherence to perceptions of social reality in the
'light' of conscious awareness -- the equivalent to photosynthesis, which could
have been termed 'psychosynthesis', if this did not already have other
connotations. And as with the branching structure of plants (and petal formation in
flowers), such belief systems take a multitude of forms, patterning psycho-social reality
in two-fold (dualities), three-fold (trinities), four-fold (quaternities), and higher,
forms of organization (exemplified by the many systems of categories).
Such belief systems develop, replicate and evolve. As the organization of individual or
collective attention, any particular manifestation (as with an individual plant) is of
limited duration and is vulnerable to other forces in the community. The attention span of
a person reflecting a particular belief system (whether through discourse, meditation or
some other practice) is a matter of hours at most -- before that particular manifestation
must necessarily pass away in favour of some other mode of attention essential to thriving
in a community.
As recognized in the current call for a return to core values, the coherence created by
particular manifestations of belief systems is a prime source of nourishment for other
forms of attention and social engagement -- namely those unable to synthesize coherence
directly through any form of psychosynthesis. Like animals, such forms of engagement
consume living manifestations of belief or practice on which they may be totally dependent
for their survival. A member of a community may of course engage in
'plant-mode', providing coherence (eg in the practice of some discipline) that
the same member may subsequently consume in 'animal- mode' (eg as when a morning
meditation sustains a person throughout the day). But the duration of this mode is also
limited and must necessarily pass away, possibly as the prey of some
'carnivourous' form of 'animal-mode'. Presentations at a conference
(often expressed as planting seeds) may then be usefully understood as providing food for
the nourishment of an audience -- usefully to be understood as operating in
'animal-mode', usually as 'herbivores'.
The active manifestation of plant or animal-modes of engagement finally ceases however,
with other modes then coming into play to breakdown structures that are no longer
sustained and which would otherwise clutter up psychic space. These are of course the
'fungi-' and 'bacteria-modes' which, as Harper noted, were above all
characteristic of the unconscious, unless the subject of psychotherapeutic or spiritual
As a community, the conference skillfully avoided the traps of over-definition in
exploring these possibilities. Of greatest importance was the recognition of the
importance of a balance between anabolic and catabolic processes, through whatever forms
of social engagement these were expressed. This ensured an appropriate balance between the
'positive' processes through which structures were built up, and the
'negative' processes through which they necessarily passed away -- to be
subsequently regenerated in some new manifestation. Avoiding the usual demonization, this
balance met the needs of both those concerned with affirmation of existing patterns
(typically in plant-mode), and those concerned to replace them by new patterns (typically
in animal-mode). But as a dynamic balance of processes, this could only be achieved
through the insights of permaculture rather than through vain attempts at manipulation of
Playful exploration of such insights was possible because many participants were more
than familar with the tangible manifestation of these patterns in nature. They were seen
as a web of insights and interactions through which psycho- social organization could be
more explicitly and effectively rendered congruent with nature and the challenges of
community. There is a charm to 'gardening' one's own community rather than
relying on the narrowly-focused skills of community-building and community-development.
Harper stressed the shift from a focus on 'standard of living' to
'quality of life'. The conference highlighted the need for what was termed
'quality of attention' or 'quality of engagement'.
Reframing 'community glue': the pattern-that- connects
It is increasingly recognized that the psycho-social coherence of communities depends
on mysterious processes that have been labelled 'community glue' (Context
Institute, op cit) -- a metaphor reinforced by a number of participants. This is related
to 'shared values' (Context Institute, op cit) and to the Holy Grail of many
community builders, namely 'consensus'. It is the community glue which is seen
as the underlying guarantee of the fruitfulness of approaches to community economics and
governance. Without it, no matter how well thought out, such approaches can only result in
sterile initiatives that are essentially unsustainable. As such it is the guarantor of
Unfortunately, because of its elusive nature, community glue cannot be manufactured
like any other product. However, labelling it so reinforces the belief that this is
possible. The assumption is that bonds can be produced through suitable bonding processes
-- the physics and chemistry of 'bonding' become part of the glue metaphor
(presumably including the property of 'tackiness'). Many community building
facilitators and 'animators' have processes that they believe build community
bonds -- seen as a psycho- social analogue to the operation of glue. Whether these bonds
are appropriate for sustainable community is another matter -- as is the kind of community
that can be glued together in this way. This is also true of efforts to identify and, if
necessary, impose shared values -- portrayed as the royal road to sustainable community
challenged by fragmentation.
Fortunately the conference sought ways to move beyond the abiotic metaphor of glue (and
its production through what are often the simplest of processes -- including the rendering
of bones). The conference recognized this to be a metaphor imbued with the mind-set of
industrialization -- an industrial-era approach to the challenge of post- industrial
community organization. The limitations of the 'community glue' metaphor were
readily seen through the question: 'what is the glue that holds together a natural
ecosystem?'. Can species be glued together to form an ecosystem? In Gregory Bateson's
terms, the 'pattern-that- connects' in nature is identical with
'quality'. 'Glue' was recognized as about the most primitive and
reductionistic metaphor for such quality -- especially if the connecting pattern has
something to do with a quality of attention or engagement.
Restrictive understandings of sustainable community
The conference was able to highlight the ways in which disciplines and practitioners,
with vested interests in a narrow understanding of community building, were able to
portray themselves as the key constructors of the pattern- that-connects:
- Economists, facing the disastrous consequences of their past blinkered arrogance, are
busily engaging in retro-fitting exercises to take account of 'externals' in
order to reposition economics as the key to sustainable community. They remain unable to
explain why seemingly less efficient communities may be judged qualitatively more
attractive and sustainable (eg how to explain the attractiveness or ambiance of two
neighbouring cafes, one full and one empty). According to Tom Peters (Liberation
Management), they are incapable of understanding the 'joy and tingle' that
makes life and work attractive, .
- Architects and planners (and the 'habitat' community) pursue the illusion that
if only they were allowed the freedom to design the physical layout of the ideal
community, the people who lived there would be naturally entrained into a
pattern-that-connects appropriate to sustainable community -- such a pattern being implict
in the behaviours conditioned by the architectural layout. They deny any responsibility
for the behavioural disasters arising from the built environment of the past decades.
- Technologists imply that if only energy efficiency could be ensured, community would by
definition be sustainable. No research is undertaken on resource rich communities to
determine whether there are any flaws in this argument -- despite considerable anecdotal
evidence of the psycho-social dissatisfactions of suburban life amongst the upper income
- Ecologists and environmentalists expect that if only resources could be appropriately
conserved and recycled, nature would be protected, resulting again in community
sustainability by definition. This fails to recognize what might be termed the Eden
Paradox, namely whether to understand 'the Fall' as occasioned by inappropriate
relationships between people, or by their abuse of their environmental paradise, or by
some combination of the two.
Most challenging are those who stress the intangibles -- the process people -- because
they claim to strive to address the pattern-that-connects basic to sustainability. But
they do it in a variety of simplistic ways, brooking no challenge to the subtlety of their
preferred process, and unwilling to recognize any limitation or shadow to their approach.
The most charismatic and power hungry end up creating sustainable communities that others
readily label as cults - - whether or not they have abusive features or collapse
In contrast to 'glue', a renowned American social scientist, Amitai Etzioni,
has stimulated a 'communitarian' movement with his book The Spirit of
Community (1993). Although the connotations of 'spirit' are a welcome
substitute for those of 'glue', he too is reduced to discussing the subtlety of
bonding in simplistic terms. Faced with the fragmentation of society, he sees shared
values as essential to 'shoring up morality' -- a strange metaphor in a society
renowned for tearing down any construction that was so decrepit that it needed to be
shored up. As with the bonds in glue, there is no ability to distinguish different types
of bond nor the differences between the entities so bonded. This favours a monoculture of
equality designed to sanction out all difference as part of the 'shoring'
process -- however vigorously Etzioni attempts to deny it. There are key values that are
not about to be shared, as has been demonstrated over centuries of violent relationships
between religions -- the key difference between vegetarians and meat-eaters is but a
Any future science of bonding (as exemplified below in relationships between species)
must also allow for the possibility that Person (or Role) A, that does not share
significant values with C, nevertheless can be held in relationship to A by Person (or
Role) B acting as an intermediary. This does not require that B should seek to eliminate
valuable differences of perspective by 'conflict resolution' to satisfy a
pathological need for consensus. A chain of many intermediaries may be required to bridge
radical differences between A and C. As in chemistry, different types of atoms and bonds
allow for the construction of complex molecules. Those sensitive to patterns of group
'chemistry' therefore have more complex insights. This accepts that each role
necessarily undermines the community in some way, but that other roles are able to
develop, precisely (if not only) through responding to counteract such excesses. Although
valid in simple situations and homogeneous cultures, Etzioni's vision therefore reflects a
'Newtonian' limiting case at a time when the equivalent of
'relativity', 'quantum' and 'chaos' theory insights are
required to encompass the complexity of contemporary community.
Despite such potential conflation of categories and distinctions, essential to
specialized interests, the conference was nevertheless able to dissociate the quality of
attention basic to the pattern-that-connects and essential to the sustainability of
Psycho-social permaculture: gardening a community
It was appropriately symbolic that the conference should be held at Findhorn. As a
successful community, the Findhorn Foundation achieved early worldwide publicity for the
quality of its gardening under adverse circumstances. Its emphasis has since shifted to
educating people in the spirit of community. The conference process took a step beyond
that to focus explicitly on the challenges of 'gardening a community' -- for
which a community garden may offer many insightful metaphors. One of Bill Mollison's
principles of permaculture is: 'Everything gardens, or has an effect on its
environment' (Permaculture; a designer's manual, 1988).
As a gardener, Peter Harper was again helpful by drawing attention to the political
metaphors implicit in conventional approaches to gardens. He pointed out that the best
ground, most visible from the house, tends to be given to the flowering plants with no
utilitarian function, namely that cannot survive without constant attention: the
'ruling elite'. Less genteel, and therefore placed at a greater distance, are
the herbaceous perennials and shrubs: the bourgeoisie. At greater distance, and possibly
hidden behind a hedge, is the vegetable garden, namely the herbs and vegetables 'that
carry the crucial stigma of being useful' to the preceding classes: the petty
bourgeoisie and the artisan class. And 'beyond the garden gate, or in the wilder
parts of a large estate' are the wild flowers tolerated provided they keep their
place: the yeoman peasants. And finally comes the riff-raff, for whom there is no place
and which every effort is made to eradicate, namely the 'urban mob': the weeds.
As a community a conference also has its 'flowers' -- the keynote speakers,
gurus and VIPs to whom attention tends to be drawn by every means. Less visible are the
'herbaceous perennials' -- the workshop leaders. Then come the 'herbs and
vegetables' -- the regular participants whose presence sustains and nourishes the
life of the conference. Then there are the 'wild flowers' -- the non-persons who
provide the infrastructure for the event (the receptionists, helpers, cooks, ushers and
cleaners), whose presence is tolerated to the extent that they can be treated as
invisible, or seen but not heard. And finally there are the 'weeds' -- the
gate-crashers, hangers-on and other ill- behaved undesirables, who always seem to manage
to insinuate themselves into a gathering, no matter how well-planned, providing a
continuing headache for organizers (the 'gardeners').
The conference had the great advantage that a high proportion of participants was
familiar with the principles of permaculture -- a number were permaculture designers. The
organizers had put a great deal of effort into envisaging a permaculture design for the
event, mapping out fruitful relationships between the different 'species'
participating in a succession of stages through the life of the conference as a community.
The challenge on the spot was to enable the participants to discover through what roles
they could most fruitfully participate to ensure the sustainability of the community.
Especially challenging in a self-organizing event, was enabling participants to
distinguish the occasions on which they might each function as flowers (wild or
cultivated), weeds, vegetables, herbaceous perennials -- or gardeners.
Permaculture takes a radically different approach to that of conventional gardening and
horticulture. A key principle is that of 'companion planting' whereby apparently
quite unrelated plant or animal species are carefully juxtaposed because of the benefits
that accrue from their relationship. The intention is to avoid the need for artificial
intervention by the gardener in the form of fertilizer, pesticides or herbicides, which
are costly and have negative and unsustainable environmental impacts. For example ***
Inspired by such concerns, the conference organizers were able to avoid the need either
to periodically stimulate participant productivity artificially (through
'warm-up', 'ice-breaking', 'bonding' or motivating
processes) or to depend on application of artificial control procedures (pre- defined
rules and sanctions) to restrain unruly, unplanned or spontaneous behaviour. The major
challenge was to recognize and balance a number of interlocking cycles vital to the
sustainable growth of the species effectively represented in the conference ecosystem by
the participants in their different capacities.
Permaculture focuses carefully on cycles linking different elements of a natural
system. The conference responded to the challenge of how as a self-organizing system it
effectively 'gardened itself' by enabling participants, through one or more of
their individual capacities, to position themselves within the conference community. As
suggested by the principles of permaculture: 'To enable a design component to
function, we must put it in the right place. This may be enough for a living component, eg
ducks in a swamp may take care of themselves, producing eggs and meat and recycling seeds
and frogs. For other components, we must also arrange some connections, especially for
non- living components, eg a solar collector linked by pipes to a hot water storage. And
we should observe and regulate what we have done.' (Mollison, p. 39) Imitating nature
offers the best guidelines in design. It is recognized that good initial patterning leads
naturally to unforeseen, serendipitous results.
The conference built its explorations on permaculture's selection of a
'guild'. A guild of plants and animals is defined as a species assembly that
provides many benefits for resource production and self-management. Mollison builds on Ed
Haskell's recognition of 9 possible interactions between any species (ranging from
symbiosis, through commensalism, predation, parasitism, to synnecrosis). The art of
designing a permaculture system lies in the appropriate combination of species to benefit
from the consequences of each type of interaction -- avoiding a simplistic focus on
'symbiosis'. For Mollison, the key to this lies in configuration of species such
that intervening species are placed between mutually hostile species (see also: Rolfe A
Leary. Interaction Geometry: an ecological perspective. USDA Forest Service,
General Technical Report NC-22, 1976). The conference put a lot of effort into configuring
relationships between those present to ensure fruitful interactions that improved the
productivity of the event as a whole.
Patterning in time
Essential to the final success of the conference as a community was its use of time.
Initially the community was a relatively unfruitful gathering, since complex systemic
linkages naturally had to emerge from a communication space with relatively sparse
connections. As in any challenging environment, people tended to participate through their
hardier roles. In permaculture terms, such pioneer species assist the area by stabilizing
water flow in the landscape, later giving shelter, providing mulch, or improving soil
quality for their successors.
Over the life of the conference, the community evolved through a succession of
conditions toward a long-term stable state. In the early stages, the hardier participant
roles served to stabilize the emotional flows in the conference, providing shelter for the
emergence of less hardy species (as it became a 'safer' space), and improving
the ground conditions from which other roles could emerge.
Essential to the permaculture approach is an understanding of patterns (Mollison, Ch.
4). The conference made sophisticated use of visual and computer techniques to develop the
patterns that sustained its self-organization and development processes as a community.
For Mollision: 'Patterning is the way we frame our designs, the template into which
we fit the information, entities, and objects assembled from observation, map overlays,
the analytic divination of connections, and the selection of specific materials and
technologies. It is this patterning that permits our elements to flow and function in
beneficial relationships.' (Mollison, p. 70). Of great importance to the conference,
in avoiding a naive pursuit of 'consensus' and 'symbiosis', was the
application of the permaculture principle: place an intervening, mutually-compatible
component between two incompatible systems, to maximize interdependence -- recognizing
that 'stupidity is an attempt to iron out all differences, and not to use or value
them creatively' (Mollison, p. 80).
Conference community as a living machine: treating psycho-social sludge
Communities generate waste products, as do any living systems. Psycho-social
communities are no exception to this. Just as processing sewage and toxic wastewater have
become a major environmental challenge to many residential communities, so the processing
of the negative emotional and conceptual by-products of psycho-social activities (however
well-intentioned) is increasingly problematic in communities throughout the global
village. A conference is itself no exception to this challenge, despite assumptions that
such a gathering only produces positive results.
According to permaculture principles, a pollutant is 'an output of any system
component that is not being used productively by any other component of the system. Extra
work is the result of an input not automatically provided by another component of the
system' (Mollison, p. 38)
The focus on 'glue' obscures insight into the emotional quality or tone of
the community and the manner in which it can be 'polluted' by negative emotions
and 'bad vibes' -- eroding the quality of engagement and possibly leading to the
eventual breakdown of the community. As with sewage, it is usually considered quite
inappropriate to discuss such negative by-products or their treatment by a community. As
Peter Harper noted, the topic is embedded in denial and quaint euphemisms like 'going
to the little boy's room' -- matched by corridor use of 'shit' as a
compensating macho expletive.
Such attitudes are both unhealthy and exceptionally dangerous in any effort to achieve
sustainability. Framing the challenge as one of 'resolving' or
'eliminating' conflict is another way of avoiding recognition that
'negative', 'breakdown' products are a natural part of the life of a
community and cannot be magicked away by using 'spirit of harmony' like some
A unique achievement of the conference was explicit recognition of the need to treat
the psycho-social 'sludge' continually generated as part of its life as a
community. This recognition was triggered by the opening, during the conference, of a
'living machine' (the first in the UK) for the Findhorn Foundation. Such
machines (of which 17 are now in operation worldwide) treat sewage and wastewater using a
whole systems approach to biological technology -- possibly in a greenhouse containing a
series of tanks. They utilize a set of sequenced, complete ecologies which are reliable,
robust and aesthetically pleasing.
The approach represents a shift from high energy, chemically intensive treatment, to
the adoption of the principles of ecological engineering. Diverse communities of bacteria,
algae, micro-organisms, numerous species of plants and trees, snails, fish and other
living creatures interact as whole ecologies in tanks and bio-filters. The ecological
network of species creates internal biological rendundancies, improving efficiencies and
providing greater resiliency. These breakdown the sewage and toxic products as they move
through the tanks, resulting in water which can be recycled, as well as fish and plant
products for consumption. No chemicals are required.
The research behind this technology was carried out by John Todd (From Eco-cities to
Living Machines; principles of ecological design, 1994). The conference was able to
adapt these design principles to develop a pattern of community structures and processes
which could function as a 'living machine' to process its own psycho-social
sludge. They key to this was the provision of a sequence of contexts or spaces for the
interactions between different forms of attention, ranging from 'bacteria-mode'
through to 'plant-' and 'animal-mode'. This succession of contexts
enabled these different modes of attention to feed on the negative, toxic products,
gradually stripping out 'odours', 'pathogens' and 'solids'
in order to clarify the quality of communication and attention. Some of these contexts
tend to emerge naturally in a community, but the achievement of the conference was to
design them into a pattern which processed the sludge to a higher standard of clarity,
providing a template for sustainability in any psycho-social community.
Todd's work, as with permaculture, is based on the principle that biology is the model
for design. The ecological design that he advocates is the design for human settlements
that incorporates principles inherent in the natural world to sustain human populations
over a long span of time. The conference breakthrough was its ability to demonstrate how
such principles could be adapted to sustain intangible psycho-social communities --
irrespective of their value to the tangible biological communities and their built
environments, which are the focus of Todd's work.
Building a conference community: the architectural challenge
'Sustainable community' has become a topic for which the agenda is defined
and nourished essentially by architects, planners, and those concerned with the tangibles
of community design and construction. Historically, at the international level at least,
it is a redefinition of 'habitat', 'shelter' and
'settlement', in the light of 'sustainability'. For public relations
reasons, 'community' puts a valuable gloss on the tangibles and has therefore
been used to package their concerns to garner wider support from those with other
sensitivities. As noted above, architects, especially those of the environmentalist
school, are not renowned for their interest in psycho-social dynamics, and for what makes
a community live. They operate best when they are free to assume that such dynamics follow
from the forms that they design. Many sterile town centres are memorials to such
approaches. There are eco-villages which may become similarly sterile in psycho-social
terms as a consequence of this mind-set.
Within the conference, the complexities of community design, the limited time
available, and the multiplicity of apparently conflicting perspectives, were directly
addressed with the assistance of computer facilities. Sophisticated use of design packages
was made by participants, working as a complex team, to integrate into a coherent
framework what would normally be perceived as disparate, conflicting and incoherent views.
This was largely achieved by a highly innovative reframing of the way in which such design
packages are normally used.
Characteristically such design software is used by architects and planners to build up
material frameworks within which spaces necessary for particular economic and social
functions can be positioned. In this conference the software was used to design a
framework to position and interrelate the spaces (including the 'tanks' of the
living machine) within which quite distinct forms of communication and dialogue could be
maintained. In effect it was used to develop a context to ensure the
'self-management' of the differences characteristic of a sustainable community
as collective understanding of it emerged.
The design process itself became part of the design because of the sharp differences in
perspective held by the range of participants. As with any complex building or city, the
'framework' which emerged from this process remained a continuing challenge to
comprehension from any particular perspective. It was recognized that it could not be seen
as a finished design product to be presented and imposed as a kind of blueprint for
sustainability in the 21st century. Rather the framework was seen as a way of
interrelating emergent perspectives and styles of order, and as such necessarily subject
to continual challenge. This challenges were seen as essential characteristics of a
As with the team design of major new software products (such as Windows NT),
participants were obliged from the start to use the design they were producing as the only
means available to them to integrate their own disparate views -- effectively a bootstrap
design process. Individual frustration with that design was at each stage a further
incentive to amend it to accommodate what would otherwise have been excluded or rejected.
The elegance of the emergent framework therefore derived to a great degree from its
ability to give design significance to the differences in perspective of those
contributing to the design. Alternative perspectives, and the ability to integrate them,
were therefore a fundamental and necessary feature of the design -- and its value to those
subsequently expected to benefit from it.
At the core of the conference's achievement was the recognition by participants that
many aspects of material design could be reinterpreted as essential to the design of
psycho-social structures -- even to the design of 'sacred spaces'. One of the
insights was that in conceptual terms gatherings had to be 'constructed'. A
meaningful policy or planning conference was one which provided appropriate conceptual
spaces for different purposes -- and ensured communication between them. In part the task
of the conference was to build anew such a pattern of spaces. And in this sense the
conference was subject to daily redesign rather than being locked into a design frozen,
weeks or months before, by organizers insensitive to the spontaneous responses of
To some degree this is already common in some conference programme design. But in this
case, the conference made 'conference architecture' into an art form at the
conceptual level. The conference had to be designed and built by the participants -- the
viability of the resulting 'built environment' was a measure of their success in
sustainable policy design.
This is not the place to discuss their approach to the 'foundations' or to
many other features of the resulting conceptual construct or its affective dimensions.
Most striking perhaps was their use of space. Each participant faction (and there were
some radically opposed views) found it reasonably easy to design a space for itself and
its own 'wares' -- somewhat as do major exhibitors in designing their stands at
an exhibition associated with a conference. The first real challenge was to be able to
design with others a conceptual context in which participants with similar priorities and
values could successfully explore their relationships. In this phase, corresponding to the
meeting of sub-plenary groups, the design views of participants were constrained and
inspired by their immediate peers. Then followed the challenge of relating that space to
those of other groups with other priorities, so that participants could move from space to
space. At this design stage, each group had to take into account requirements of other
groups -- compromises had to be made.
The most challenging phase was the construction of the collective conceptual space in
which all viewpoints were interrelated, providing integrity to the whole, namely the
equivalent of a plenary conference room. A central architectural insight lay in the means
of constructing an arch -- or a series of arches which could be roofed over to protect the
space. In effect, even for the smaller spaces, participants were often obliged to retrace
the history of architectural principles and techniques. The challenge was to use opposing
conceptual elements as columns and to use various ways of bridging between them to create
the desired space -- whatever scaffolding was temporarily acquired to install keystones or
For the smaller spaces this tended to call upon principles from the very early history
of architecture. To create a space for all views -- the conference in plenary form --
required a much more sophisticated understanding because of the wide expanse that had to
be covered with minimum intervening supports.
The achievement of the participants was to use opposition between policy and other
perspectives on sustainable community as 'compression elements' and to use
mutually supportive perspectives as 'tension elements'. Their skill, inspired by
physical buildings, lay in finding ways of using the dynamic interplay between two types
of element to create structures which would be impossible with either of them alone. They
effectively used the elements of a duality so that the 2-dimensional stresses between them
-- which normally render any conceptual construction impossible -- could only be resolved
by engendering a space in 3- dimensions. This opened the way to the design of new kinds of
psycho-social structures. In some cases this resulted in 'gothic' structures --
'cathedrals of the mind' as envisaged by Katherine Forsythe -- in others it
resulted in what might best be understood through Buckminster Fuller's tensegrity
structures (basic to his geodesic domes).***** In its own way the Universal Hall, the
venue for the conference constructed by the Findhorn Foundation members, became a symbol
of what the conference was able to achieve using architectural principles to structure
In preparing inputs for the United Nations Conference on Habitat (Istanbul, 1996), the
gathering deliberately extended understanding of 'shelter' to encompass the
vital, intangible dimensions to which Christopher Alexander had drawn attention in The
Timeless Way of Building (1979) as a prelude to his discussion of pattern language
(see above). He argues: 'There is a central quality which is the root criterion of
life and spirit in a man, a town, a building, or a wilderness. This quality is objective
and precise, but it cannot be named....And when we have this quality in us, we tend to
make it come to life in towns and buildings which we help to build. It is a
self-supporting, self-maintaining, generating quality. It is the quality of life.' It
is this dimension which has hitherto been absent from any discussion of 'sustainable
community' or 'habitat'. Without it, and however long they endure, such
communities are as sterile and unsustainable as refugee camps, and as incapable of
providing significant 'shelter' to the human spirit.
Enriching community ecosystems
It is one thing to emphasize psycho-social structures and processes, it is quite
another to ensure that a sufficiently diverse ecosystem emerges within such niches to
ensure sustainability. As the living machine and permaculture illustrate, the key question
is: what species capable of interacting in what ways.
The conference recognized that the prevailing emphasis on equality of individuals, with
all its political connotations, was obscuring differences vital to the survival of any
community. These are however increasingly recognized in management programmes concerned
with team building within a corporate culture. Different forms of thinking are recognized
(Edward de Bono), as well as different contributions to team operation (B Meredith
Belbin). The psychological types identified by the Myers- Briggs test may even be used as
a basis for culling employees as part of downsizing programmes. Such personality typing is
however very simplistic, being capable of identifying only a handful of types -- often
with little sensitivity to the web of relationships in which they operate most fruitfully.
The conference seized on the possibility of using a wide variety of species in the
natural environment as patterning templates through which community ecosystems of great
richness could be recognized, engendered or cultivated. The principle of
'equality' could be seen as appropriate to the individual, but not to the many
species of behavioural role into which the individual incarnated simultaneously or on
different occasions. It was the individual's ability to activate, and shift between, quite
different roles -- in response to other roles -- which was a key to the sustainability of
the community ecosystem.
An awesome challenge for humanity was seen by the conference to be the need to
recognize or engender a range of role species within a human community commensurate with
those in the natural environment -- if the human community was to be able to genuinely
recognize the value of the range of species to be conserved in the natural environment.
Any appropriate response to nature was recognized as dependent on engendering the patterns
of nature within a sustainable psycommunity. But achieving this was, at the same time, the
royal route to meaningful sustainability within any psycommunity. The key lay in
appropriately mirroring nature, rather than in 'dominating',
'domesticating' or superseding nature.
Conference participants then playfully explored such behavioural patterns as those of:
birds, reptiles, insects, rodents, fish, arthropods (crustacea), coelenterates (jelly
fish), nematodes, molluscs, plants, fungi and bacteria. The question was what patterns of
interaction were encoded in their behaviour and lifecycles which provided a scaffolding
for understanding vital interactions between roles in a human community.
In their 'intellectual' modes, participants explored the constraints and
opportunities of bird-like behaviour: soaring in formation through the conceptual air;
migrating between conceptual continents around the globe of human understanding; and
marking territories through particular songs from the branches of appropriate belief
systems. They also played with the insights of the traditional Sufi tale The Conference
of the Birds.
- In their 'affective' modes, participants explored the constraints and
opportunities of behaviours characteristic of water species: swimming through emotional
environments (whether singly or in shoals); responding to pressures and other signals;
taking on protective forms and coloration, exhibiting avoidance behaviour in response to
potential dangers; and migrating with the seasons.
- In their 'practical' modes, participants explored the constraints and
opportunities of behaviours characteristic of ground-bound species: using alternating and
complementary movements to shift position in relation to the ground (walking, running,
climbing, burrowing); manipulating objects (whether for food or shelter).
- In their 'unconscious' modes, participants recognized the need for behaviours
characteristic of fungi and bacteria: breaking down existing structures, transforming
their constituents, as a prelude to their incorporation into new structures.
- In their 'belief' or 'paradigmatic' modes, participants recognized
the constraints and opportunities of behaviours characteristic of plants: the possibility
of combining light (insight, intuition, or inspiration), water (emotion), air (concept),
with the breakdown products of past structures (obtained through a system of roots), as
the basis for growth; adopting particular orderings of branches or petals (paradigmatic
features), often with the object of attracting other species; opting for forms offering
particular strategic advantages under certain conditions (tree, shrub, fern, flowering
plant, grass, moss); and supplying other species with resources as a means of ensuring its
own reproduction and dissemination.
To some degree, participants were inspired by the attitude of some tribes people to
totemic species and the need for an individual to acquire maturity through relating, in
some deeply meaningful way, to a species in the natural environment (James Cowan. On
Totems). But, although playful, the essential challenge was understood to be
recognizing the ways in which such patterns already existed in one form or another in any
community -- it was not necessarily a question of engendering new patterns. However,
although some patterns might be present, they might not be present in a form essential to
sustainability or to the richness required of a mature community. Like a gardener
encountering a new environment, the challenge was how to work with what was there, and how
to build on it, if that was appropriate. And, perhaps crucially, what phyla and species
could be considered 'expendable', and by what criteria?
Reframing employment, unemployment and psycho-social security
In moving beyond conventional fascination with the environmental and construction
dimensions of sustainable community, the conference addressed the most intractable issue
threatening to undermine sustainability of any kind. With an estimated 20 million
unemployed in Western Europe alone, and with the predicted collapse of social safety nets
and increase in civil unrest, the need for a radical reframing of community was
reinforced. Responding to this post-industrial world with the logic of the industrial era
can only be doomed to failure.
As the insights from permaculture and the living machine made clear, the
'bonds' defining relationships in community are not like the simplest
'stick' representations of molecular bonds. Like the latest models of molecular
bonds, they can better be understood as transactions or field effects, moulded in this
case by the quality of attention and engagement between those concerned. In contemporary
society it is economics which defines the nature of such transactions in terms of
(input/output) exchanges of valued products or services. This understanding is codified in
legislation governing employment, social security and the operation of the monetary
system. The question addressed by the conference was whether this codification had
dangerously reduced the possible range of transactions through over- simplification and
rigidification -- eroding the pattern- that-connects to a degree that makes sustainability
By drawing upon biological insights, the conference focused on how a person could
'incarnate' into a community many times through a variety of often co-existing
roles which lived, grew, propagated and died. The question was how to grasp how a role was
'employed', 'nourished', 'sheltered' and
'sustained', through the pattern-that-connects -- and how to distinguish
fruitfully between an individual and the many roles through which he/she participated in
One breakthrough was the recognition that, whether the individual incarnated in
'protozoa-', 'plant-' or 'animal- mode', each such temporary
engagement or expression ultimately ended as another role's 'lunch' -- possibly
nourishing another role in the same individual's repertoire. From this perspective, the
naivety and rigidity of 'win-win' approaches to sustainability became apparent.
In a learning community, it is only through short-term 'losing' that long- term
learning is possible -- but the loss is at the role level of engagement, whilst it is the
individual and the community that learn.
In such a context, how is 'productive work' to be distinguished from other
kinds of role activity? How is the individual to manage and develop the ecosystemic
pattern of roles through which he/she is engaging in community at any one time? And how
are the values exchanged through transactions to be evaluated and recompensed? Whereas
marketing has long valued the concept of a niche, this understanding has met with less
favour in relationship to employment. And yet there may be much of relevance to the
employment crisis that could be understood by investigating how nature 'employs'
a particular species. Niches in nature may be usefully seen as equivalent to employment
opportunities in a sustainable community. The current destruction of environmental niches
by humanity may in fact be closely parelleled by the destruction of role opportunities in
psycho-social systems -- the same mind-set may be responsible.
Dematerializing community: emphasizing intangibles
The conference made use of the new thinking on the need for the 'dematerializing
of society' whereby well-being is dissociated from levels of material consumption.
This features in Agenda 21 as formulated at UNCED (Rio de Janeiro, 1992), now
coordinated by the United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development and implemented
through national and local authorities. As envisaged there, a first step in a
dematerialized economy is to shift from a society in which production and consumption are
based on the use of primary raw materials to a society in which production and consumption
become based on the use of secondary raw materials. In a sustainable community this
process can however be taken much further. This can be summarized by a phrase from a
corporation executive quoted by Tom Peters: 'If you can touch it, its not real'
(Liberation Management, p. 8). Corporations, according to Peters, are increasingly
concerned with the opportunities represented by intangibles. Those concerned with
sustainable community may find themselves obliged to follow this lead.
The challenge was seen by the conference as one of delinking quality of life from the
tangibles promoted by economists and commercial interests, and clarifying how it might be
carried by the intangibles of community life -- and without being exclusively associated
with a single belief system. To this end experiments were envisaged to reframe exploration
of 'voluntary simplicity' and 'living lightly' to determine in what
ways well-being could be maximized whilst reducing dependence on tangibles. This calls for
a clearer understanding of the pattern-that-connects and how people engage their attention
in it and are nourished and sustained by it. As many have discovered, the quality of
tangibles is no guarantee of quality of life, although it is in the interests of
conventional economic growth to present it so. But since such growth is now only sustained
by what amounts to a global 'pyramid selling' scam, alternative perspectives
The question the conference addressed was: 'what makes for a sense of well-being
in those for whom tangibles are of secondary significance'. Extreme cases are perhaps
hermits and austere religious communities. Contemporary examples include New Age
travellers, gypsies, and young people exploring newly acquired independence. Others
include those obsessed with scholarly, artistic and sporting (surfing) pursuits, as well
as inventors and adventurers. Most striking is the case of those in love or imbued with an
ideal. Like any sense of well-being, it has occasionally been noted that 'falling in
love' does not contribute detectably to GNP or economic growth -- in contrast to a
costly divorce or an accident involving hospitalization. Little wonder that the role of
intangibles in community life remains unexplored except as an advertising gloss to assist
the sale of tangibles.
Some presentations at the conference focused on the possibilities of de-monetarizing
community life -- a good example being the Local Exchange Trading System (LETS). The
conference used these to explore other exchange processes that would not be dependent on
trading in goods or services. The question is what is exchanged to sustain community life.
Extreme clues include the savagery of urban violence attributed purely to the 'lack
of respect' or 'honour' important to gang pecking orders. In religious
movements, charismatic effects may be fundamental. Repressed cultures have been sustained
through song and humour.
A major opportunity for the future was seen to lie in dissociating 'poverty'
from 'well-being'. For many this might prove to be the only route offered in the
savagely competitive global environment favoured by economists. The challenge is then not
how to 'reduce poverty' (according to the standards of homo economicus)
but rather how to 'increase well-being'. The challenge is not how to produce
tangibles but how to nurture the intangible pattern-that- connects by which people feel
sustained as members of a community -- raising the question of the sustaining capacity of
a community and its relationship to administrative 'safety nets'. This is as
much a choice for the individual as a choice for a community, as those who choose to leave
the 'rat race' have long established.
A striking, but little-known, contemporary example was provided by the Swadhaya
Movement, notably active along the western coast of India. As described by Shri R K
Srivastava of the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies (New Delhi): 'Swadhyaya
is neither a cult nor a sect; it is neither a party nor an association; it is neither
messianic nor limited to a particular section of society; it is neither directed against
centralising state power nor to overcoming flaws in Indian society, though such
consequences may follow. Swadhyaya is both a metaphor and a movement. It is a metaphor in
the sense of a vision, and a movement in terms of its orientation in social and economic
spheres.' Building on qualities long articulated within the Hindu spiritual
tradition, emphasis is placed on the quality of relationship between people, especially
within the context of the most impoverished villages. This has led to a remarkable, and
growing, capacity to regenerate village life. Refusing any economic assistance from either
Indian government or foreign sources, unusual achievements have been made in thousands of
villages, even in such physical terms as replenishing wells and managing farms.
Such an example raises the question whether it offers lessons to be learnt for
sustainable communities in the west. Perhaps more challenging is whether such an example,
and that of The Farm and the Amish communities in the USA, could be understood within a
context like the UN Conference on Habitat (Istanbul, 1996). Community sustainability is as
much a question of psycho-social patterns as of a appropriately designed built environment
-- but the former may in many cases be secondary to the latter. The latter is not
necessarily capable of engendering the former.
The conference's efforts to highlight the quality of engagement were reinforced by
Henryk Skolimowski's The Participatory Mind (1994). He argues that:
'Participatory philosophy is the ultimate courage of man to surprise himself by
creating realities surrounding him/her; the ultimate courage to realize that all is a web
of dreams, but dreams so tangible and lucid that we cannot distinguish them from reality
because they a reality....Participatory philosophy declares that to be a person in the
participatory universe entails the recognition of the bond of participation' (p.
It is the varieties of attention which weave together in a community to constitute the
pattern-that-connects thus ensuring the quality and sustainability of community life.
Vigilance is required to ensure that community 'bonding' does not become
'bondage'. Gardening community is the challenge of the future -- it should not
be confused with community gardening.
The Findhorn conference on Eco-villages and Sustainable Communities was a success
precisely because it was able to use its structures and processes as a laboratory to
explore new understandings of patterns basic to community. The conference medium became
its own key message. It is to be hoped that future conferences on this and related issues
will be as courageous and innovative in their explorations.
- A Pattern Language. Oxford University Press, 1977
- The Timeless Way of Building. Oxford University Press, 1979
Gregory Bateson. Mind and Nature: a necessary unity. E P Dutton,
Meredith Belbin. Management Teams: why they succeed and fail.
Diane Gilman and Robert Gilman (Eds.). Eco-Villages and Sustainable Communities; a report for the Gaia
Trust. Context Institute, 1991
James Cowan. On Totems. Resurgence, 138, pp. 30-34
Amitai Etzioni. The Spirit of Community: rights, responsibilities and the communitarian agenda. Crown, 1993.
Peter Harper. A Microcosm of Life; the way we organize our gardens reflects
the way we organize our lives, our society, our politics, our busineses and
our knowledge. Resurgence,
Jon R Katzenbach, and D Smith. The Wisdom of Team: creating the high performance
organization. Harvard Business School Press, 1993
Rolfe A. Leary. Interaction Geometry: an ecological perspective. USDA Forest
Service, General Technical Report NC-22, 1976
Lynn Margulis and Karlene Scwartz. Five Kingdoms: an illustrated guide
to the phyla of life on Earth. W H Freeman, 1982
Bill Metcalf (Ed.). From Utopian Dreaming to Communal Reality: cooperative
lifestyles in Australia. Sydney, University of NSW Press, 1995
Bill Mollison. Permaculture; a designer's manual. Tagari Publications, 1988.
Tom Peters. Liberation Management: necessary disorganization for the Nanosecond
Nineties. Ballantine Books, 1996
Jonathon Porritt. Save the Earth. Andrews Mcmeel, 1991
Henryk Skolimowski. The Participatory Mind. Penguin Arkana, 1994.
R K. Srivastava. Swadhyay Movement. Delhi, Centre for the Study of Developing
Nancy Jack Todd and John Todd. From Eco-cities to Living Machines: principles of ecological design. North Atlantic Books, 1994