-- / --
This text has been slightly adapted from the draft Universal Declaration of Human Responsibilities, proposed by the InterAction Council in 1997 (as amended in 1998) for consideration by the United Nations as a complement to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948). No action has since been taken on the original proposal (available in many languages). In a reaction to it, the UN approved a Declaration on the Right and Responsibility of Individuals, Groups and Organs of Society to Promote and Protect Universally Recognized Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (53/144, 9 December 1998).
A draft proposal for a very comprehensive Declaration of Human Duties and Responsibilities was adopted in 1998 in Valencia, under the auspices of UNESCO and the Valencia Third Millennium Foundation, by a high-level group (chaired by Richard J Goldstone) and then submitted for consideration to UNESCO in 1999 as the "Valencia Declaration" (but without any apparent follow-up). An earlier proposal, known as the Trieste Declaration of Human Duties (also known as the Carta of Human Duties), had been drafted from 1992 by the International Council of Human Duties. The Earth Charter (completed in 2000) has also been considered to be a Declaration of Human Duties and Responsibilities even if it does not bear that name -- notably by recognizing the need for "reproductive health and responsible reproduction".
Since the adoption of the 1948 Declaration, the peoples of the world have been witness to the totally irresponsible, self-interested pursuit of human rights by signatories of it or by those invoking its clauses. They have also been witness to massacres on a scale commensurate with those it was designed to prevent, which continue at this time -- and with merely token response by a United Nations arguably complicit in the process to some degree (as with Srebrenica and Rwanda).
In a Universal Declaration on Democracy (adopted in 1997), the Inter-Parliamentary Union specifies: Democracy is inseparable from the rights set forth in the international instruments recalled in the preamble. These rights must therefore be applied effectively and their proper exercise must be matched with individual and collective responsibilities.
Whilst there has long been a UN Commission on Human Rights, there is no such Commission on Human Responsibilities. The process of Dialogue among Civilizations, initiated by the United Nations in 2001, was immediately followed by the arrogation of the right by some permanent members of the UN Security Council to engage in a "war against terrorism" -- sustained by a religious and strategic mindset regarding a "clash of civilizations". In so doing they set aside some human rights enshrined in international law, notably with regard to the use of torture. Terrorism may be understood as one inappropriate form of human intercourse, just as its causes are another, and as may be the reaction to it. The UN Report of the High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change (A More Secure World: our shared responsibility, 2004) might be seen as another effort to reframe the question of human responsibility.
Most issues resulting in human suffering and death, that are of concern to the United Nations, are a direct consequence of irresponsible human intercourse -- including global warming and the consequent climate change (see Begetting: challenges and responsibilities of overpopulation, 2007).
Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world and implies obligations or responsibilities,
whereas the exclusive insistence on rights can result in conflict, division, and endless dispute, and the neglect of human responsibilities can lead to lawlessness and chaos,
whereas the rule of law and the promotion of human rights depend on the readiness of men and women to act justly,
whereas global problems demand global solutions which can only be achieved through ideas, values, and norms respected by all cultures and societies,
whereas all people, to the best of their knowledge and ability, have a responsibility to foster a better social order, both at home and globally, a goal which cannot be achieved by laws, prescriptions, and conventions alone,
whereas human aspirations for progress and improvement can only be realized by agreed values and standards applying to all people and institutions at all times,
whereas the Universal Declaration of Human Rights addresses itself to the inalienable rights of humanity, and to the protection of all people against abuse of power by governments or institutions of governments, this proposed declaration is a moral appeal which addresses itself to issues of conscience and ethical behaviour. While governments are clearly responsible for just and equitable laws, there are many matters of conscience for which we must be our own judges.
proclaims this Universal Declaration of Responsibilities of Human Intercourse as a common standard for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, should contribute to the advancement of communities and to the enlightenment of all their members. We, the peoples of the world thus renew and reinforce commitments already proclaimed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights: namely, the full acceptance of the dignity of all people; their inalienable freedom and equality, and their solidarity with one another. Awareness and acceptance of these responsibilities should be taught and promoted throughout the world.
Every person engaging in intercourse with others, regardless of gender, ethnic origin, social status, political opinion, language, age, nationality, or religion, has a responsibility to treat them in a humane way.
No person engaging in intercourse with others should lend support to any form of inhumane behavior; all people have a responsibility to strive for the dignity and self-esteem of all others.
In engaging in intercourse with others, no person, no group or organization, no state, no army or police stands above good and evil; all are subject to ethical standards. Everyone has a responsibility to promote good and to avoid evil in any form of intercourse with others.
All people, endowed with reason and conscience, in engaging in intercourse with others, should accept a responsibility to each and all, to families and communities, to races, nations, and religions in a spirit of solidarity: What you do not wish to be done to yourself, do not do to others.
Every person has a responsibility to respect life in engaging in intercourse with others. No one has the right to injure, to torture or to kill another human person during that process. This does not exclude the right of justified self-defense of individuals or communities.
Disputes between states, groups or individuals, regarding the process and outcome of intercourse, should be resolved without violence. No government should tolerate or participate in acts of genocide or terrorism, nor should make use of intercourse as a means of abusing women, children, or any other civilians as instruments of war. Every citizen and public official has a responsibility to engage in intercourse in a peaceful, non-violent way.
Every person engaging in intercourse is infinitely precious and must be protected unconditionally, as with any outcome of that process. The animals and the natural environment also demand protection from abusive human intercourse. All people have a responsibility to protect the air, water and soil of the earth for the sake of present inhabitants and future generations.
Every person engaging in intercourse with others has a responsibility to behave with integrity, honesty and fairness. No person or group should rob or arbitrarily deprive any other person or group of their property during that process.
All people engaging in intercourse with others, given the necessary tools, have a responsibility to take into account, in doing so, the need to overcome poverty, malnutrition, ignorance, and inequality. Through their intercourse, they should promote sustainable development all over the world in order to assure dignity, freedom, security and justice for all people.
All people engaging in intercourse with others, have a responsibility to develop their talents through diligent endeavor; they should have equal access to education and to meaningful work. Everyone should lend support to the needy, the disadvantaged, the disabled, and to the victims of discrimination and abusive intercourse.
All property and wealth must be used responsibly by those engaging in intercourse with others in accordance with justice and for the advancement of the human race. In the process of intercourse, economic and political power must not be handled as an instrument of domination, but in the service of economic justice and of the social order.
Every person engaging in intercourse with others has a responsibility to speak and act truthfully. No one, however high or mighty, should speak lies. The right to privacy and to personal and professional confidentiality is to be respected by those engaging in intercourse with others. No one is obliged to tell all the truth to everyone all the time.
With respect to the process of intercourse, no politicians, public servants, business leaders, scientists, writers or artists are exempt from general ethical standards, nor are physicians, lawyers and other professionals who have special duties to clients. It is for the professions and their members to establish appropriate ethical codes relating to the process of intercourse which reflect the priority of general standards, such as those of truthfulness and fairness.
With respect to the process of intercourse, and as an aspect of it, the freedom of the media to inform the public and to criticize the institutions of society and governmental actions is essential for a just society. It is the responsibility of those involved to exercise their freedom with a sense of responsibility and discretion.
While religious freedom must be guaranteed, the representatives of religions have a special responsibility to avoid expressions of prejudice and acts of discrimination toward those of different beliefs regarding the process of intercourse. They should not incite or legitimize hatred, fanaticism and religious wars, but should foster tolerance and mutual respect between all people engaging in intercourse.
All men and all women have a responsibility to show respect to one another and understanding in their partnership and the associated processes of intercourse. No one should subject another person to sexual exploitation or dependence. Rather, sexual partners should accept the responsibility of caring for the well-being of each other.
In all its cultural and religious varieties, bonds associated with intercourse require love, loyalty and forgiveness and should aim at guaranteeing security and mutual support.
Sensible family planning is the responsibility of every couple engaged in intercourse. The relationship between parents and children should reflect mutual love, respect, appreciation and concern. No parents or other adults should exploit, abuse or maltreat children.
Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any state, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the responsibilities, rights and freedom set forth in this Declaration and in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights of 1948.
The only reference to obligations in the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights is Article: 29: "Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible."
Not everyone at the time thought that was enough. Mahatma Gandhi, on being consulted about that Declaration, wrote: "The Ganges of rights originates in the Himalaya of responsibilities." Many have continued to note the ineffectively addressed issues of Western bias in the original Declaration -- resulting in the formulation of alternative declarations, such as the Universal Islamic Declaration of Human Rights (1401/1981).
Article 30 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights could therefore be usefully interpreted as: Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein -- or to avoid any responsibility set forth in the Universal Declaration of Responsibilities of Human Intercourse.
A clarification of the nature of intercourse,
in support of this proposal, is provided separately:
"Human Intercourse": "Intercourse with Nature" and "Intercourse with the Other" (2007).
Alliance for a Responsible, Plural and United World:
Charles Amjad-Ali. Human Rights in Islam: text and interpretation -- superfluity on issues of human rights in Islam. Human Rights Solidarity, 1996, 6, 2 [text]
Amnesty International. Muddying the Waters: the draft 'Universal Declaration of Human Responsibilities' -- No complement to human rights. 1 April 1998 [text]
Thomas Axworthy. Human Rights and Human Responsibilities: Overlapping Concerns. Markkula Center for Applied Ethics, 2007 [text]
Baha'ai International Community:
Joanne Bauer. International Human Rights and Asian Commitment December 1995 (based on discussion at the first workshop of the Carnegie Council s project, "The Growth of East Asia and Its Impact on Human Rights," Hakone, Japan, 1995). [text]
Consultative Council of Jewish Organisations. Statement on the Codification of Human Duties and Responsibilities (54th Session of the U.N. Commission on Human Rights), 2002 [text]
Dalai Lama. Human Rights and Universal Responsibility (United Nations World Conference on Human Rights, Vienna, 15 June, 1993). Government of Tibet in Exile [text]
Antoon de Baets. A Declaration of the Responsibilities of Present Generations Toward Past Generations. History and Theory 43, 2004, 4, pp. 130-164 [text]
E. Jane Doering. Simone Weil: Human Rights and Human Responsibilities (Paper from the 2001 Culture of Life Conference). Notre Dame Center for Ethics and Culture [text]
Jack Donnelly. Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice. Cornell University Press, 2003.
Nigel Dower. The Earth Charter and Global Ethics. Worldviews: Environment, Culture, Religion, 8, 2004, 1, pp. 15-28 [abstract]
Arthur J. Dyck. Rethinking Rights and Responsibilities: the moral bonds of community. Georgetown University Press, 2005
Earth Charter Initiative. Earth Charter. 2000 [text in 30 languages]
Amitai Etzioni. Universal Declaration of Human Responsibilities. Philia: a dialogue on carting citizenship, 2005 [text]
Gareth Evans. The Responsibility to Protect: humanitarian intervention in the 21st Century (2002 Wesson Lecture in International Relations Theory and Practice). International Crisis Group [text]
Richard Falk. Affirming Universal Human Rights. Human Rights and Human Welfare, 3, 2003 (review of Jack Donnelly, Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice, 2003) [text]
Malcolm Fraser. Human Rights and Human Responsibilities in the Age of Terrorism (Address at Symposium on "Human Rights and Human Responsibilities in the Age of Terrorism", April 2005, Santa Clara University) [text]
Jostein Gaarder. Human rights and Human Obligations (Lecture at the International PEN Congress in Tromsø, Norway, 10 September 2004 and at the Sophie Prize Seminar on 14 June 2006) [text]
Mia Giacomazzi. Human Rights and Human Responsibilities: A Necessary Balance? Santa Clara Journal of International Law (paper for the 'Human Rights and Human Responsibilities Symposium', 1 April 2005 at Santa Clara University as part of the High-Level Meeting of the InterAction Council.) [text]
Mark Gibney, Katarina Tomaševski and Jens Vedsted-Hansen. Transnational State Responsibility for Violations of Human Rights. Harvard Human Rights Journal, 12, Spring 1999 [text]
Richard Goldstone. Declaration of Human Duties and Responsibilities (Valencia Declaration.Valencia: Fundación Valencia III Milenio, 1998)
Philip Gilbert Hamerton. Human intercourse. 1890 [text]
Hans Hass. Human Rights - Human Obligations. Lisbon Expo '98 Declaration. 1998 [text]
Mark Harris. Sexuality is a Rock: the world of human intercourse is a hard place (Ruminations on the Report of the Theological Committee of the House of Bishops of the Episcopal Church), 2003 [text]
Michael Ignatieff. Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry. Princeton University Press, 2001
Inter-Parliamentary Union. Universal Declaration on Democracy (Adopted by the Inter-Parliamentary Council at its 161st session, Cairo, 1997) [text]
Islamic Council. Universal Islamic Declaration of Human Rights. 19 September 1981 / 21 Dhul Qaidah 1401 / [text]
Yersu Kim. A Common Framework for the Ethics of the 21st Century. UNESCO, Division of Philosophy and Ethics, September 1999 [text]
Yasuhiko Genku Kimura. Creating a Culture of Responsibility. VIA: The Journal of Integral Thinking for Visionary Action, 1, 2, 2003 [text]
Hans Küng and H. Schmidt (Eds.). A Global Ethic and Global Responsibilities: two Declarations, London, SCM Press, 1998 (documents the proposal made by the InterAction Council to the United Nations, calling for a Universal Declaration of Human Responsibilities, a proposal inspired in large part by the global ethic idea. Includes contributions of H. Küng and J. Frühbauer as well as the preface of Lord Yehudi Menuhin and the synoptic comparison with the text of the Global Ethic Declaration document). [text]
Faisal Kutty. A Western Construct? The Legacy of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. World Prout Assembly, December 2006 [text]
Klaus M. Leisinger. On Corporate Responsibility for Human Rights ( Report of the Special Advisor to the Secretary General on the Global Compact of the United Nations). Basel, April 2006 [text]
Mary Maxwell. Toward a Moral System for World Society: a reflection on human responsibilities. Ethics and International Affairs 12, 1998, 1, pp. 179-193 [text]
Ted Mosquin and J. Stan Rowe. A Manifesto for Earth. Biodiversity, 5, January/March 2004, 1, pp. 3-9 [text]
Robert Muller. Ideas and Dreams. Vol VII, #2935 ( "It is high time that the United Nations should create a High Commission on Human Duties and Responsibilities headed by a High Commissioner as is the High Commission for Human Rights") [text]
National Institute for Research Advancement (NIRA). Research on "Universal Human Obligations". NIRA Research Output Series (Japan), Vol.12, No.2, 1999, 509 p. ( "The content of this publication provided the basis on which the "World Declaration of Human Responsibilities" was proposed by the Inter Action Council.") [abstract | contents]
James W. Nickel. Making Sense of Human Rights: philosophical reflections on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. University of California Press, 1987
Irene Oh. Islam and the Reconsideration of Universal Human Rights. University of Miami, May 2005 [text]
Organization of American States. The American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man (approved by the Ninth International Conference of American States, Bogotá, Colombia, 1948). [text]
Rex Pay. Human Obligations. 2005-7 [text]
Ismail Kurban Husein Poonawala. Laws Pertaining to Human Intercourse (The Pillars of Islam: Volume II). Oxford University Press, 2004
Joseph Runzo, Nancy Martin and Arvind Sharma (Eds.). Human Rights and Responsibilities in World Religions. Oxford, Oneworld, 2003 (notably discusses a proposed Universal Declaration of Human Rights by the World's Religions) [text]
Horst Rutsch. A More Secure World: our shared responsibility. UN Chronicle, 2004, 4 (Report of the High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change) [text]
Simone Weil. Draft for a Statement of Human Obligations. 1943 In: Sian Miles (ed). Simone Weil: an anthology. Grove Press; Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 2000
For further updates on this site, subscribe here