-- / --
The contents of this document originally appeared as sections within Poetic Engagement with Afghanistan, Caucasus and Iran: an unexplored strategic opportunity? (2009). These sections are presented separately here since together they also constitute an appropriate annex to a more recent document in which the possibilities of poetic discourse are further developed (Enactivating Multiversal Community: hearing voices in the global wilderness, 2012). Some of these possibilities have also been discussed in Enabling a 12-fold Pattern of Systemic Dialogue for Governance (2011). The argument has been subsequently further developed in Improvisation in Multivocal Poetic Discourse: Basque lauburu and bertsolaritza as catalysts of global significance (2016).
Poetic discourse as a lost art: The argument in what follows emphasizes improvisation rather than recital of poetry previously prepared. This does not preclude insertion into the discourse of prepared verses, possibly selected from classic poems. But if they have to be read -- not having been memorized -- this is already an indication of lack of the spontaneity essential to interactive debate, responsive both to the other contributors and to any emergent aesthetic synthesis. This mode may indeed call for an unusual combination of skills, although these have been a part of the poetic tradition -- especially in Islamic cultures. The argument assumes that, given the strategic potential, people with poetic skills in a context of improvisation could be sought and encouraged in these abilities -- as with so many other skills that require development, as with strategic negotiation itself.
It is unfortunate that the extensive literature on terms like "poetic discourse" rarely if ever signifies any sense of actual dialogue between parties using that mode -- even when the discourse is designed to enable social change. Such terms, implying such interaction, might be said to have been appropriated in order deliberately to disguise the fact that the discourse is unilateral from poet -- typically in written form, but occasional as a recitation -- to a listener, or more typically a reader. There is an assumption of assymetry in that the poet's aesthetic skills are assumed to be greater than those of the essential passive listener. Curiously this echoes the manner in which authorities, such as national leaders, engage in "dialogue" with citizens through televised "fireside chats" (possibly themselves pre-recorded).
There would seem to be no term that identifies unambigiously any form poetic discourse in the moment between equal parties. Rather the poet is assumed to have prepared the poem for later recital or publication and that any "dialogue" is a virtual one in which the poet imagines a listener and the reader imagines that the poem engenders the presence of the poet. The situation is somewhat different in some tribal folk traditions where one poet indeed responds to another. However it is then unclear whether the responses -- typically in the modes of panegyric (glorification) or diatribe (invective) -- are effectively "cut and paste" exercises using remembered verses as appropriate in an essentially defensive exercise of tribal self-aggrandisement. In effect one poet "blasts" another competitively in an exercise in one-upmanship -- a mode well-echoed in international strategic debate.
Use of a term like "poetic discourse" then tends to obscure recognition that "poetic debate" is actually a lost art, although "poetical rhetoric" naturally implies use of a degree of poetry in the phrases used in the prose form of the rhetoric of the debating parties. Insight into when the "rhetoric" is so impregnated with poetry as to be understood as constituting "poetic debate" is again not a focus of attention. A feature of the "lost art" is that this unfortunate misapplication of terminology disguises the fact that whilst students may be taught to read and appreciate poetry, to recite it, and possibly to write it, there is no sense in which they are expected to acquire skills to engage with each other through poetry -- improvised spontaneously in response to content formulated in the moment.
Curiously this lost art is again a reflection of discourse on vital strategic matters in formal international arenas. There, typically, a speech is prepared for "recital" -- and printed copies may even have been distributed to the audience. Any speeches in response may have been similarly prepared and distributed (if only to facilitate the task of "simultaneous interpretation" between languages). The speeches may not even be designed to respond to each other but only to a predefined theme. Opposing speeches are even known to have been written by the same speechwriter. Any passionate sense of suffering, or appeal to larger value frameworks, is then a rational construct (at best decorated with poetic flourishes). Any written outcome of the event may also have been scripted and agreed in advance -- transforming the whole exercise into a piece of theatre.
The analogous condition in the case of "poetic discourse" tends to avoid response to a contrary perspective or -- if it is represented physically or by implication -- again takes the form of verses prepared in advance and not in response to those presented in the moment. Provocatively, at a time of financial crisis when the inter-institutional lending of "values" has frozen, it might be asked whether the failure of poets to lend and borrow aesthetic values in a fruitful pattern of interaction does not exemplify that challenge at an archetypal level.
Poetic interaction is nothing more than interaction in which the hearer of an utterance, rather than its speaker, determines its meaning -- and does so because the utterance is... either irredeemably ambiguous or otherwise anomalous. Poetic interaction is thus an elementary form of situating reason, in that it is the initial form out of which such reason develops. (p. 22).
However, following this analysis, he argues that:
But my narrative cannot end here, for it is also the story of how poetic interaction became lost -- theoretically occluded and practically proscribed. (p. 201)
The metaphysical prescriptions of Aristotelian thought occluded poetic interaction altogether.... Philosophy and other sciences... could make no use of poetic utterances... poetic interaction could not even be recognized as an independent form. (p. 400)
In a useful review of these issues, Chad Lykins (The Practical and the Poetic: Heidegger and James on Truth, Chrestomathy, 2003) concludes that:
James believes the very desire for a more primordial account of truth is rooted in the practical, psychological need for novelty. Heidegger thinks that to reduce poetic engagement to a form of practical engagement is to forget the essence of the former and mistake it for the essence of the latter. James holds that if one wants to get at poetic engagement, then one ought search in the places from which it actually emerges, 'the muckiness' of practical engagement.... The poetic engagement that James and Heidegger seek to preserve emerges as an answer to practical needs, not as proof that those needs presuppose a necessary foundation. While Heidegger argues in vain that practical engagement presupposes deeper structures, James demonstrates that the very concept of a deeper structure emerges from our practical needs for rationality and poetic engagement
Is this confusion the fundamental reason why the strategies of governance, articulated with "reason", have proven to be so boring, sterile and unfruitful -- especially in response to situations especially characterized by "muckiness"?
Lost archetype?: Other than through the expression of audience appreciation, is conventional poetry now to be understood as a non-interactive art form, even elitist? See discussion by Maureen N. McLane (On the Use and Abuse of "Orality" for Art: reflections on romantic and late Twentieth-Century poiesis, Oral Tradition, 2002), although this does not highlight improvisation..
Indeed, where are the "poets" that can "think on their feet" (creatively), in the "heat of the moment" (strategically), and in response to the existential challenge of "the other" (fruitfully)? If poetry is to offer any guidance to debate of higher quality, then there is a need for poetic discourse and debate to practice skills it might expect others to adopt in some measure. Detecting traces of such skills and their practioners is a first step.
It is unfortunate, given the archetypal models they represent, that neither The Glass Bead Game (1943) of Hermann Hesse, nor the Seven Days in New Crete (1949) of Robert Graves offers indications as to how such an interaction might ideally function.
Medieval Europe: Unfortunately the vital possibility of this process is obscured by widespread use of the phrase "poetic debate" to denote "debate about poetry". A less confusing term "debate poetry" is clearer -- an early form being known as conflictus. A review of this tradition in Europe is provided by Emma Cayley (Debate and Dialogue, 2006). Cayley herself distinguishes:
Clearly some "poetic
have been pre-scripted, and performed (or simply read) as set pieces, rather
than improvised by genuine opponents in response to genuinely controversial
positions they upheld.
The terminology does not help to distinguish these various forms or even any
"poetry about a debate".
One insightful description of the interesting variant is that provided by John M. Hill, et al (The Rhetorical Poetics of the Middle Ages: reconstructive polyphony, 2000) quoting Jon Whitman (Hebrew University of Jerusalem):
The adversaries [in a poetic debate] share a common frame of reference, that on some level they both contribute to a single community. Indeed, one of the salient features of the poetic debate is its effort to show contraries complementing, rather than simply opposing, each other, a feature that leads many debates to end either without a clear "winner" or with some kind of reconciliation... A more complex cosmological approach to the strategy of interdependence, based on broader philosophic sources and principles, will develop by the twelfth century, but already in the poetic debate, there is a constant tendency to turn metaphoric figures into metonymic terms of a larger whole.
The medieval courts of Europe were entertained not only by a male troubadour but occasionally by a female trobairitz -- known to have engaged in poetic debate together. In the Provençal literature of France, the partimen is a poetic debate, but it differs from the tension in so far that the range of debate is limited; in the first stanza one of the partners proposes two alternatives; the other partner chooses one of them and defends it, the opposite side remaining to be defended by the original propounder.
Dialogue in Islamic cultures: Potentially of special relevance to the strategic challenge is the understanding of the process associated with the Arabic term munatharah through its various associations:
It would appear that munatharah is best understood as an appropriate mode of debate whose nature may be notably modified if the focus is theological, secular or a form of literary entertainment. Although he argues that, as such, munatharah "has almost completely disappeared", Abbas Ali (Business and Management Environment in Saudi Arabia, 2008, p. 190) provides a very helpful distinction, in the light of facilitation possibilities in corporations, between the complementary set of 5 Arab debating styles of which munatharah is a part:
As Ali notes, all methods have been used in traditional Islamic culture and have helped, to some extent, in maintaining cultural transition. He considers their utility in organizational development should not be underestimated. As such they may call attention to the need for a different facilitation style (Islamic Perspectives on Management and Organization, 2005, p. 225). What is not clear from his focus on dialogue among executives is the manner in which these forms are reinterpreted with respect to either theological or poetic discourse -- as an art form (Sheikh Al-Shanqiti, Art of Jadal and Munatharah).
Needless to say there is little indication of their relevance to the conflicted dialogues in the Middle East.
It would be interesting to explore any influence that such processes had, through the occupation of Spain by the Moors, on the development of debate in Europe -- notably the poetic style of debate of the 14th century, as documented by Emma Cayley (Debate and Dialogue: Alain Chartier in his cultural context, 2006).
Improvisation in oral poetry: It is to be expected that oral poetry, whether associated with folk traditions or not, would offer some degree of insight into interaction between poets in a discourse mode (Richard Bauman, Verbal Art as Performance, 1984; Ruth Finnegan, Oral Traditions and the Verbal Arts: a guide to research practices, 1991; John Miles Foley, How to Read an Oral Poem, 2002). Again however it is typically far from clear from the terminology when the oral poetry is improvised -- composed during the recitation -- irrespective of whether this is done in interaction with one or more other poets.
With regard to improvisation, the Center for Basque Studies (University of Nevada) organized a Symposium on Oral Improvisational Poetry (2003) sponsored by the Bernard and Lucie Marie Bidart Fund. The programme featured studies of improvisational songs in various cultural traditions, including the Castilian romances, the Judeo-Spanish ballads, the Ibero-American decimas, the Asturian cante jondo, the Santanderian trovas, the Slavic guslari, the Arabic invectives, and the Basque bertsolariak.
The published contributions (Samuel G. Armistead and Joseba Zulaika, Voicing the Moment: improvised oral poetry and Basque tradition, University of Nevada Press, 2005) also mention current traditions in:
In his contribution, Samuel G. Armistead (Improvised Poetry in the Spanish Tradition. 2005) notes:
Such poetry, often involving verbal dueling and mordant invective, has been cultivated by Hispanic peoples for many centuries. Its origins remain obscure, but they undoubtedly involve a variety of Mediterranean and Near Eastern cultural currents... In these poetic contests, known as echarse pullas, "one person wished all sorts of misfortune, for the most part obscene, upon another, who replied in similar strain.... Invective poetry, much of it -- originally at least -- orally composed and some of it undoubtedly improvised on the spot and as needed, is surely of very ancient origin and is probably worldwide in distribution. There can, however, be little doubt that Hispanic verbal dueling is ultimately connected in direct oral tradition to Horace's opprobia rustica and to an ancient Pan Mediterranean heritage of poetic competition. (p. 30-1)
These ancient origins were also cited by Maximiano Trapero (Improvised Oral Poetry in Spain, 2005), describing the Homeric tradition (of which active traces are curently to be found in Slavic poetry, known for its relationship to nationalist politics):
This poetic contest had certain rules: whoever started had the right to choose the subject and his opponent had to answer him, to such an extent that the latter always remained at the mercy of the former's chosen topic and subject to his 'attacks'; yet the second one could both answer and counter attack at the same time, thereby giving rise to a duel of attack and counter attack that could go on until one of the contestant's strength (and reason) waned, or until both of them (as was the norm...) declared himself the winner. (p. 46)
As remarked by David R. Olson (From Utterance to Text: the bias of language in speech and writing, 1977), Trapero also notes that poetry today is immediately associated with its written form, whereas written poetry is an extremely modern phenomenon whose origin is in millennia of oral poetry.
Initially, the medieval literary genre of debates (also known as "recuesta", "tenso" or "partiment") became famous, with Provencal troubadours taking the genre to its highest levels and spreading it throughout Europe. The debate might bring forth real, flesh and bone, people or instead concern abstract, allegorical beings, to which human conditions were ascribed. This all took place in a context of opposites: male/female, love/dislike, wine/water, winter/summer, rich/poor and so on. (p. 49)
Verbal improvisation of poetry now takes the form of slam in western cultures (notably described as poetic jousting), involving a degree of enactment of a recital -- where normally the text is fixed before performance. Poetry slam is the competitive art of performance poetry. It originated in the US as a means to heighten public interest in poetry readings. It has now evolved into an international art form -- as described by Susan B.A. Somers-Willett (Slam Poetry: Ambivalence, Gender, and Black Authenticity in Slam, 2001; Can Slam Poetry Matter? Rattle: poetry for the 21st century). See also: Chris Mooney-Singh, Getting Out Of The Poetry Ghetto; Poetry and Improv: A Perfect Match? (2009). Its origins in the Chicago rap culture merit reflection as suggesting a potentially viable mode for engagement with other cultures, such as those of Afghanistan. President Barack Obama has spent a significant period of his professional life in Chicago.
Improvisation is also valued as enabling cultural renewal (James W. Fernandez, Playfulness and Planfulness: improvisation and revitalization in culture. p. 97-119).
Armistead, for example, offers as anecdotes:
There is an active Arabic hija' tradition of improvised invective, diatribe and insult in verse (C. Pellat, 1971; C. Elliott, 1960). One popular form is naqa'id. This would seemingly have contributed to the development of the tradition in Ibero-American cultures (James T. Monroe. Improvised Invective in Hispano-Arabic Poetry and Ibn Quzman's "Zajal 87". p. 135-159; Adnan Haydar, The Development of Lebanese Zajal: genre, meter, and verbal due, 1989). Various authors discuss modern Arabian improvised invective (S. A. Sowayan, 1985, 1989; G. van Gelder, 1988). Of particular relevance to the current exploration is the fact that during the 1991 Gulf War, rival radio and television broadcasts, made use of hija poetry -- with Iraqis and Saudis trading poetic insults on a daily basis (Ya'ari and Freideman, 1991). Pre-Islamic Arabs are known to have hurled curses at the enemy as they went into combat.
Flyting is a public contest of extravagant insults, often structured in the form of a poetic joust. It is similar to African American practice of freestyle battles and the historic practice of the dozens. In Germanic cultures, the convention can be detected earlier, for example in the confrontation of Beowulf and Unferð in Beowulf. Flytings were a feature of early Germanic cultures either a prelude to battle or as a form of combat in their own right. Taunting songs are part of many cultures predating Scottish flyting, such as Inuit civilization. A comparable form is to be found in the competitive verses of Japanese haikai.
Folk traditions: It is appropriate to note that the journal Oral Tradition (Center for Studies in Oral Tradition) has an extensive database of readily accessible articles, in addition to offering sound files from various traditions. Relevant to this exploration are forms which are notably recognized by terms such as "poetic wrestling" or "poetic jousting".
Also to be noted, in addition to those mentioned above, are:
The aim of that debate as conceived by its proponents was to rekindle nationalism and national values versus clan ideology and kinship. The Deelleey poetic debate was coordinated by one of the modern Somali poets, the scholar who discovered the metrics of Somali poetry. Although most of the poets who participated in the debate knew how to read and write, their poems were in oral form and were tape-recorded. The fixed rules were that every poet must alliterate his/her poem in D and must produce the poem in jiifto or maanso genre
How ironic that Somalia should have so recently explored so seriously a political possibility that less conflict-torn countries have failed to do. However this initiative should be compared with the commentary, noting the role of poetry, by Martin Kramer (Arab Nationalism: mistaken identity, Daedalus, Summer 1993).
Interactive dialogue projects: In addition to those identified above, and especially that of the Center for Studies in Oral Tradition, a variety of projects and initiatives touch on related concerns and merit reflection on their successes and constraints with respect to the encounter between cultures:
Whilst not directly relevant to this exploration, there have been numerous international initiatives to enable poetry in different ways (as recorded in the Yearbook of International Organizations). Curiously an unusual proportion of them have not proved to be viable.
|Towards a clarification
of connotations of the phrase "poetic debate"
to highlight most relevant to socio-political poetic engagement (tentative)
[interactions in the lower right portion of the table are potentially most significant]
|Degree of improvisation||Thematic content||Number of active participants in the debate|
(possibly simulating alternating voices/views)
|3 or more
|Pre-prepared, set-piece articulation
in poetic form
(possibly allowing for a degree of thematic response to the other
|People exemplifying values||.||.||.|
|Constrained improvisation in poetic
theme and possibly positions to be taken; even ritualised within a tradition)
|People exemplifying values||.||.||.|
|Constrained improvisation in poetic
(thematic challenge by one participant imposing a theme on another)
|People exemplifying values||.||.||.|
|Improvised, but making spontaneous
use of selected verses from classic poems
(free with thematic focus emerging through interaction)
|People exemplifying values|
|Spontaneous poetic improvisation
(free with thematic focus emerging in response to the dynamics of interaction)
|People exemplifying values||.||.||.|
This table of course echoes the range of forms of participation in conferences of any kind -- from reports about them (or about hypothetical events), through typical presentations of pre-prepared documents, ritualised set-piece dialogues, to improvisation in response to the thematic content of others. In the case of "poetic debate" or "poetic dialogue", the possibility is to heighten the degree of resonance between participants in an improvisation -- to enhance the reverberations of the encounter as a whole. Concrete examples, such as those cited above from different cultures, could be appropriately positioned within the table in the light of the precise process implied by the terms currently used to describe them.
The following comments do not adequately take account of the insights to be obtained regarding the active disciplines of engagement characteristic of the different folk traditions mentioned above.
Collaborative aesthetics: A form of aesthetic collaboration may be said to take place through a common inspiration, even though there is no direct interaction (Lloyd Halliburton, Poetic Symbiosis: Hart Crane and Federico García Lorca, Neohelicon, December, 2001). The term "poetic collaboration" is widely used to describe various forms of mutual consultation in the preparation of poetic works. There may indeed be concern regarding the degree to which the contribution of one is "flattened" ar the expense of another or allocated in some overly rational manner. The challenge is helpfully articulated for only two poets by Lucy Newlyn (Coleridge, Wordsworth and the Language of Allusion, 2001) who asks what method do we adopt to describe the interweaving of literary emotional strands in a relationship so complex? What word do we have for a friendship which was at once productive and destructive? She comments:
Also noted was the "threat of amalgamation" which collaboration involves, implying a need to avoid the "complete merging of voices" if they were to preserve their distinct identities. With respect to the two poets, Newlyn notes:
Their divisions, when they acknowledged them, tended either to be rartionalised as compatibility or transcended by the ideal of a shared vision.... When the merging of 'compounding' of opposite styles proves impossible, collaboration is figured as an experiment that has gone wrong. (p. xxxiii)
Missing from the above is the sense in which the poets might be struggling aesthetically, even existentially and to a far higher degree, with the contrasts that their respective sensibilities represented. Rather than a "shared vision" that they held in advance -- and had already agreed upon -- the question is whether the interaction between their differences enabled the emergence of a "shared vision" that encompassed those differences without diminishing their significance -- one that had not previously been envisaged, namely something new with whose aesthetic significance they could resonate.
It is difficult to locate resources on collaborative aesthetics acknowledging the above nuances -- where the emphasis is on a common aesthetic outcome and not primarily on group process or group learning techniques (cf Leveraging Web 2.0 Technologies: building innovative online learning communities). Anindita Basu and David Cavallo (Full-Contact Poetry: creating space for poetic collaboration) describe a collaborative digital play space for children, written in Squeak, and developed at the MIT Media Laboratory. A software experiment in computational poetry, as described by Eric Elshtain and Jon Trowbridge (Gnoetry 0.2 and the Transcendence of the Human Poetic, January 2007), analyzes how words are used in an extant text and tries to discern patterns. However it does allow for a degree of interplay:
Gnoetry0.2 also allows for the human end-user to facilitate 'conversations' between disparate authors and epochs; a conversation enhanced by Gnoetry's ability to statistically weight the texts during composition. That is, the end-user may 'ask' that 23% of the time, solutions to the problem of 'haiku,' for example, be found in Emma; 21.7% in The Custom of the Country; and so on up to 100%. This function allows the 'voices' of the texts to be raised and lowered throughout the composition, much like a do-wop group trading solos and singing in different harmonies.
Following on the initiative of Bruno Latour (Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern, Critical Inquiry, 30, 2), one initiative by Marsha Bradfield and Jem Mackay (An Aesthetics of Matters of Concern, Critical Practice, 2008) raises questions rather than immediately providing answers:
What might a collaborative aesthetics involve? How might it look, feel, taste, sound, smell? More specifically, what are the possibilities of a collaborative aesthetics grounded in Latour's notion of 'matters of concern'?
Collaborative creativity: This is the focus of the Collaborative Creativity Group within a programme of the United Nations University, centered at the Maastricht Economic and Social Research and Training Centre on Innovation and Technology (UNU-MERIT). The group investigates the socio-economics of creative collaboration across all domains, but presumably with relatively little emphasis on the aesthetic creativity of significance in any strategic poetic engagement regarding a "matter of concern". It is currently collaborating with the Wikimedia Foundation to undertake a survey of the Wikipedia process.
Collaborative creativity is clearly a preoccupation of tangible product innovation (cf Hillevi Sundholm, Henrik Artman and Robert Ramberg, Backdoor Creativity: collaborative creativity in technology supported teams, 2004). A focus for such reflection is provided through the PICNIC gathering which periodically brings together and disseminates the ideas and knowledge of creators and innovators, highlighting relevant products and services at the intersection of media, technology, arts (including poetry) and entertainment.
As a form of collaborative creativity, unfortunately it is possible that it is precisely what has proven to be viable and practical in the mysterious success of open source and related projects (Linux, Wikipedia) that inhibits recognition of the subtle strategic challenges of cross-cultural engagement, as in the Middle East. At this point in time these challenges may well be better represented by the challenges and possibilities of improvised poetic debate as a reflection of contrasting aesthetic preferences. The aesthetic considerations, expressed poetically, are then intimately related to issues of collective identity -- and to challenging differences in ideological perspectives and their strategic implications.
Such reservations would clearly also apply to optimism regarding the possibilities of collective intelligence, notably as expressed by Mark Tovey (Collective Intelligence: creating a prosperous world at peace, 2008). What is carried by poetry and through poetic debate is subtler than the forms of knowledge which are the focus of innovative knowledge management.
The artists (bertsolariak), often called 'Basque troubadours,' perform in competitions broadcast on television and become regional celebrities. The audience does not need to read Euskara in order to enjoy the 'sport of words,' as it is called.... The verses created by the bertsolari must comply with specific rhyme patterns. When aficionados discuss bertsolaritza, such rhyme patterns are often at the center of their evaluation of an artist's creative production. To the novice, it can often seem as though these oral artists are faced with the onerous task of counting rhymes and syllables as they versify. However, the rhyme patterns and syllable counts per line are an intimate part of the melody being used for a particular verse, and the music is what makes it possible for a bertsolari to keep all these schemes in mind...
These differences emerge as the result of the adversarial process of advocacy and argument that characterises most assessment meetings. This process is a mixture of negotiation, rational argument and peer pressure, centred on subjective opinions about the degree to which students have achieved particular learning outcomes, as manifested in the artwork or texts presented for assessment. In most assessment meetings there is an alternating pattern of convergence and divergence of opinions, interpretations, prejudices and insights - energised by the particular dynamics of the group. However this rhythm of debate and open-ended exchange is always constrained by the need to arrive at a definitive single mark, the holy grail of quantitative assessment. In some ways the process would be much more transparent and informative to the student if the marks of each assessor were published and a cluster of marks were awarded for each unit of assessment - not one mark! This would reflect the variety of evaluations and suggest that the process, and the mark, is conditional rather than absolute.
The philosopher...uses poetical rhetoric for purposes of persuasion, but at least his or her rhetoric is informed by the truth....The poet... produces copies of the items of genesis, or what one could call simulacra (images of images). The poet thus deludes us into believing that he or she knows the truth, and this illusory knowledge is more attractive to the general populace than is the rigorous and genuine truth of philosophy. To make a long story short, if they are not checked, the poets will become the unacknowledged legislators of society, thereby usurping a role that ought to be filled by philosophers. (p. 3)This matter is of some relevance given the current appreciation of the "poetic rhetoric" of Barack Obama as President of the USA. However, any implication that philosophers are especially endowed with the truth is radically undermined by their own inability to dialogue fruitfully with each other, as noted by the philosopher, Nicholas Rescher (The Strife of Systems: an essay on the grounds and implications of philosophical diversity, 1985). He responded to their distinctly unintegrative conflict by concluding:
For centuries, most philosophers who have reflected on the matter have been intimidated by the strife of systems. But the time has come to put this behind us -- not the strife, that is, which is ineliminable, but the felt need to somehow end it rather than simply accept it and take it in stride.It is perhaps the interplay of poetry and philosophy that could be more fruitfully envisaged, through patterns as suggested below.
Periods of history that fail to awaken in the interpreter the awe of la imago fail to achieve the poetical resonance that we see characterised in the historical reconstruction of La expresión americana. Similarly, la imago itself becomes the animistic heart of the poetic (and historic) moment... Furthermore, it is not simply the historical moment that becomes the interactive text to be interpreted; a similar signifying process takes place converting the espacio gnóstico that is naturaleza into the defining text that is paisaje. Much has been written on this process of transformation from nature to landscape... Nature itself is the unwritten text that awaits the creative participation of the subject to transform it into a meaningful entity, and by extension into a cultural construct.... the epistemological dimension of the creative interpretation of both landscape and history. The subjective interaction with nature becomes a hermeneutic process - one of interpreting - and such a process is integrally linked to the processes by which we gain knowledge.Such perspectives may be valuable in challenging the assumptions of the foreign policy of the USA (and the West in general) regarding cultures like those of Afghanistan (and the Middle East in general).
A pattern language is a created thing. It is a work of poetry, a work of art. It is potentially as profound in its way as a building can be.But there seems to have been no attempts to associate the focus of Alexander's 253 interrelated patterns (see comment) -- most of which have long been a focus of poetry -- with any attempt at structuring poetic insight into the pattern they constitute as a whole. The comment however indicates how the set of phsically-focused patterns has been used experimentally as a template for the elaboration of 4 additional sets of patterns (5-fold Pattern Language, 1984): an abstract variant, a socio-organizational analogue, a cognitive analogue, and an intra-personal analogue.
|Indicative design possibilities interrelating contrasting perspectives in a poetic debate|
|Example of tensional integrity (tensegrity) structure
in which aesthetic elements of poetic dissociation (denunciation) might be indicated by solid, incompressible rods and those of association (eulogy) might be indicated by linking, tension elements; circuits might then represent verses interlocking to constitute a larger whole
|Example of aesthetic elaboration of a
in which more complex patterns of association enrich the memetic structure as a whole, enabling its further transformation or simplification
(image developed using Stella Polyhedron Navigator)
|In Quest of a Strategic Pattern Language: a new architecture of values (2008)|
The emphasis here has been on enabling skills that combine the following:
The ambition need only be modest, whatever the potential. It might be fruitfully framed as a means of engendering a different framework of mutual respect -- independent of other more conventional indicators of strength. Framed in this way, there is the possibility of more fruitful outcomes, mutually valued.
Given the modest costs associated with this possibility -- compared to other forms of more physical engagement between cultures -- it is easy to argue that there is little to lose, with the potential of there being much to gain. It might be questioned how "serious" is any such initiative. This would be a matter of collective concern in ensuring that any exploration is fruitful
The argument here is that there is little to lose and the cost of investing in such possibilities could be low. More intriguing is the poetic interface with Europe of the cultures by which the West is challenged. Perhaps a cognitive and policy reframing of the Eurovision approach -- as argued in some detail (Singable Earth Charter, EU Constitution or Global Ethic? 2006). Certainly there is scope for work by musicians, poets, songwriters, choirs and strategists -- with outcomes that might be taken more seriously by wider segments of the concerned populations than those conventionally envisaged.
Perhaps a more fundamental challenge, to enhance the potential viability, would be exploration of the relevance of:
|Relevant strategic implications of Japanese warlord
When Japan was churning in continuous, contagious arson and killing among warlords from the 16th century onwards, there were three samurai leaders who would lay the foundations for modern Japan today -- the first whose vision of the country was of one nation-state. They were to rule Japan in succession.
The three samurai leaders tried to unify the country: Nobunaga was known for his cruelty, Hideyoshi for his impetuosity, Tokugawa for his patience. A poetic parable (now learnt by all Japanese school children) was told about them.
There was a little bird who wouldn't sing, they were asked by a Zen master what they would do::
Nobunaga said, "little
bird, if you won't sing, I'll kill you"
Tokugawa became Shogun (leader of Japan) in 1603, and his dynasty ruled until 1867.
Because of the number and range of relevant references, these have been placed in a separate document: Strategic Dialogue through Poetic Improvisation: web resources and bibliography
For further updates on this site, subscribe here