-- / --
Varieties and dimensions of experiential nothingness
Comments on experiential nothingness and somethingness
Experimental configuration of nothingness as an "eightfold way"
This is a further exploration of a possible reframing of cognitive despair in the face of the outcomes of highly questionable strategic initiatives, past, present and as currently envisaged. The despair is necessarily both planet-wide and highly personal (Implication of Personal Despair in Planetary Despair, 2010). The condition can be described as a form of cognitive "ground zero" -- a sense of pointlessness notably articulated through recognition that the future offers "nothing", especially for those reduced to "nothing" by a combination of factors, as separately discussed (Reintegration of a Remaindered World, 2011; Way Round Cognitive Ground Zero and Pointlessness, 2012). This forms part of a more general discussion, where relevant references are located (Way Round Cognitive Ground Zero and Pointlessness: embodying the geometry of fundamental cognitive dynamics, 2012; see alternative table of contents).
Curiously, at a time when many are faced with the experience of some form of "nothing", physicists are giving increased recognition to the fundamental role of "nothing" in relation to cosmology and the emergence of "everything" (Lawrence Krauss, A Universe from Nothing: why there is something rather than nothing, 2011; John D. Barrow, The Book of Nothing: vacuums, voids, and the latest ideas about the origins of the universe, 2002). The integrative implications are separately discussed (Fundamental integrative role of nothing -- the ultimate remainder?, 2011). For Krauss, space and time come from "nothing", understood as an extremely unstable state from which the production of "something" is virtually inevitable. A major meeting of physicists and cosmologists highlighted unresolved issues in that respect (Lisa Grossman, Death of the Eternal Cosmos, New Scientist, 14 January 2012).
The paradox of the times is strangely "embodied" in the person of the world's premier cosmologist, Stephen Hawking, tragically afflicted by an incurable disease since the age of 21. His early death was then predicted by specialists, although he has inexplicably survived to the age of 70. Professionally Hawking has striven to demonstrate the emergence of the universe from "nothing" and the absence of any requirement for a "creator". Personally he has necessarily been confronted on a daily basis with the threat of an anticipated cognitive dissolution into "nothingness", given his worldview. Due to illness, he was absent from the meeting of physicists on his recent 70th birthday to discuss "nothing" in celebration of his achievements in that respect (Stephen Hawking misses 70th birthday celebration following hospitalization, 8 January 2012). As with the majority of those in his discipline, he has "nothing" to offer those faced like himself with "nothingness". In response to the "nothingness" faced by humanity, Hawking has famously recommended leaving the planet (Stephen Hawking: mankind must move to outer space within a century, The Telegraph, 9 August 2010; Stephen Hawking: Colonize Space or End the Human Race Yahoo! Contributor Network, 8 January 2012).
Given such serious attention to the engendering power of "nothing" by astrophysicists, it might be asked why so little insight of this quality translates into new understanding of the engendering power of the "nothing" which individuals and groups experience so tragically worldwide. The question here is the nature of the empowerment brought to light by these circumstances. Is there scope for more than what might be described as "palliative care" of a tragically dying civilization and of those condemned to experience its death throes? (Conceptual Ground Zero: empowerment declaration, 2002)
In attributing a key role to "nothing", the radical rethinking achieved by physics is held to have been inspired by "dreams" (Stephen Hawking (Ed.), The Dreams That Stuff Is Made Of: the most astounding papers of quantum physics -- and how they shook the scientific world, 2011). What then of the nature of the "dreams" of those faced with "nothing" in their own lives? What is the cognitive "stuff" thereby engendered? What of the much-deprecated Dreamtime of the Australian Aborigines inspired by the emprtiness of the desert -- as with the Desert Fathers? How might the world of governance be fruitfully "shaken"?
This articulation follows from a previous exercise (Responsibility for Global Governance: Who? Where? When? How? Why? Which? What? 2008) in the light of another (Where There is No Time and Nothing Matters, 2009). The latter drew attention to the process of "mattering" (Import of Nothingness and Emptiness through Happening and Mattering, 2009). With respect to the experience of boredom, this relates to the challenge of having "nothing to do" -- especially as experienced by both the young and the elderly.
As explored here, a potentially fruitful way of engaging with the disparate experiences of "nothing" is to consider patterns through which these may be configured -- notably patterns offering mnemonic associations to integrative symbols which continue to be active in cultural memory and a focus of long-term consideration of the implied paradoxes.
A set of distinct experiences of "nothing" or "emptiness" can be tentatively presented as follows -- in contrast with corresponding experiences of "somethingness". Detailed comments on each follow in the next section.
|Varieties and dimensions of experiential nothingness|
|"Somethingness" and "Plentifulness"
|"things": resources for living,
especially tangible possessions 
|"place" "to be" qualitatively, and
especially physically 
|"time": quality time,
especially future convergence 
|"choice": freedom and ability to choose, especially from a variety of options ||no-which
|"why": reason, rationale, justification,
especially a sense of purpose 
|"identity": a sense of self (esteem), especially within community ||no-who
|"how": means and capacity to act,
especially a sense of know-how 
|"action": undertaking action,
especially taking initiative 
|doing something||doing anything||doing everything|
The experiential contrast between "nothingness" and "plentifulness" can be usefully considered in relation to:
These senses of nothing are understood to function within an ontological hierarchy, beginning with the understanding that all nothings are things, and moving in ascending order to the assertions that all things are nothing, that things are nothing but God, nothing but God, and finally God as Nothing. This scale of degrees is ultimately understood to mean that the nothings are nothinged by the nothinger nothinged.... Accordingly, the metaphysical significance of the word "nothing" as relative rejection rather than absolute denial, is seen to point to a grammatical ground as opposed to a grammatical fiction.In the Christian ascetic tradition, this may be framed as a doctrine of emptiness, a discipline of silence in which no trace of consciousness remains, a "standing still of the mind and of the world" -- termed hesychia.
Given the great demand, it is far easier to mass-produce and mass-distribute the empty forms of nothing than the substantively rich forms of something. Indeed, many forms of something lend themselves best to limited, if not one-of-a-kind, production.... Of course, there are the rare masterpieces that may bring millions of dollars, but in the main these are small-ticket items. In contrast, thousands, even many millions, and sometimes billions of varieties of nothing are mass-produced and sold throughout the globe.... the various forms of nothing can range in cost from a dollar or two to thosands, even tens of thousands of dollars. The cumulative total is enormous and infinitely greater than the global trade in something. (Readings in Globalization: Key Concepts and Major Debates, 2010, p. 366).Ritzer extends his analysis there to The Glocalization of Nothing (p. 367) and The Economics of Nothing (p. 371). An earlier discussion of Americanisation, McDonaldisation and nothing had noted that:
On the one hand, an increaingly global market insists on large numbers and great vartieties of nothing to satisfy the increasing demand for it, at least part of this fabricated (through advertising and marketing) by the foces (corporations, states) that profit from the widespread distribution and sale of nothing. On the other hand, production of so much nothing, and the requirement that it be profitable or successful, leads to increasing pressure to find ever more remote global markets for nothingby (Neil Campbell, et al., Issues in Americanisation and Culture, 2004, p. 52)
It is a curious term that means more than "exile", in that a nomadic existence is not implied. Its meaning pertains to a sort of journey away from the world, a world from its contigencies, in pursuit of a deeper awareness of the shortness and frsgility of life. Xeniteia also suggests a desire to be unknown and of no account, and a willingness to be more flexible in one's approach to one's professional life... with the acquisition of humility. (p. 62)Contrary: Evident in the effort to claim and control space, most typically land in the form of property -- in its extreme form as imperialism and world system dominance. or possibly justified by divine mandate. An equivalent is evident in the possessiveness manifest in relation to intellectual property and virtual real estate. Webpages, as on Facebook or MySpace, may be understood as providing a sense of relatively secure personal space for many
In the vast rhythm of [Nature's] processes, as the scientific mind now follows them, she appears to cancel herself. The bubbles on the foam which coats a stormy sea are floating episodes, made and unmade by the forces of the wind and water. Our private selves are like those bubbles, epiphenomena, as Clifford, I believe, ingeniously called them; their destinies weigh nothing and determine nothing in the world's irremedial currents of events.A sense of meaninglessness, when "nothing matters", may be a characteristic of depression and despair, both individually and collectively (Implication of Personal Despair in Planetary Despair, 2010). As "unreason" and "absurdity", the nature of the condition has been variously articulated: Charles Handy (The Age of Unreason, 1989; The Age of Paradox, 1995), Michael Foley (The Age of Absurdity: why modern life makes it hard to be happy, 2011).
Complicity with negation was one of the first rule of apophatic behaviour, and one of the goals of ascenticism. The pursuit of nothingness made it possible to attain to a pure state of self-awarness (p. 24)Contrary: Evident in the promotion of particular strategies, or arrays of strategies, and even "global plans", variously acclaimed as coherent responses to gain total control of a condition -- typically ignoring learnings from past initiatives. Some may even be promoted as a form of strategic panacea, as with the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), Agenda 21 or the Millennium Development Goals.
Most of life is so dull that there is nothing to be said about it, and the books and talks that would describe it as interesting are obliged to exaggerate, in the hope of justifying their own existence. Inside its cocoon of work or social obligation, the human spirit slumbers for the most part, registering the distinction between pleasure and pain, but not nearly as alert as we pretend. There are periods in the most thrilling day during which nothing happens, and though we continue to exclaim, "I do enjoy myself", or, "I am horrified," we are insincere.Reframed cognitively through Taoist insights into non-action or not-doing, whether individually or as a key to appropriate governance -- with potentially problematic side-effects (The Quest for the Socio-Economics of Non-Action, 1993; Unknown Undoing: challenge of incomprehensibility of systemic neglect, 2008)
Doing nothing might seem to be simple and easy. But there are many varieties of nothing, and some kinds of nothing can get very elaborate and complex... A study in Britain found that, among criminals caught, convicted and sentenced, only 7 percent of these sentences involved being put behind bars. Most of what is done in the other 93 percent of the cases amounts to virtually nothing.... Had there been no United Nations, it would have been obvious to all and sundry that we were doing nothing -- and that could have had dire political consequences at election time. However, thanks to the United Nations, there is a place where political leaders can go to do nothing, with a flurry of highly visible activity -- and the media will cover it in detail, with a straight face, so that people will think that something is actually being done.
Excluded from the above variants, death is the form of "nothingness" which necessarily cannot be experienced -- although envisaged as such by some, such as Hawking (as noted above). The "nothingness of death" has long been recognized, as described by Bernard N. Schumacher (Death and Mortality in Contemporary Philosophy, 2011, pp. 151-167) who concludes:
All contemporary philosophical thanatalogists, to varying degrees, have noted the importance of the Epicurean thesis of the "nothingness of death" in speculation about death. (p. 216)
As noted by Angelos Mouzakitis (Worlds Emerging: approaches to the creation and constitution of the common, 2006), despite Heidegger's later attempt in his book An Introduction to Metaphysics (1959) to describe Dasein as fundamentally violent, there is still missing in Heidegger's text something similar to Emmanuel Levinas's equation of death as nothingness with the will to annihilate the Other through murder:
More profoundly and as it were a priori we approach death as nothingness in the passion to murder. The spontaneous intentionality of this passion aims at annihilation. Cain when he slew Abel should have possessed the same knowledge. The identiying of death with nothingness befits the death of the other in murder. (Levinas, Totality and Infinity: an essay on exteriority, 1969, p. 232)
Of relevance is the poignant experience of the passing of cultures and languages -- and the "nothingness" left by absent loved ones. Of interest is the percpetion of the exitinction of species, as articulated by Joshtrom Isaac Kureethadam (Banished behind the Curtain of Nothingness: the ecological problem of species extinction):
To cause the extinction of a species is tantamount to banishing it for ever behind the veil of nothingness. The extinction of a species is, in philosophical terms, a passage from ens to non-ens, from being to non-being, from existence to non-existence. The mass extinction of species is not just death for the individual species concerned, but death of birth itself, as the extant species are consigned for ever in the cauldron of nothingness with no hope of re-birth.... Extinction is indeed the loss of evolutionary history itself,68 as no living traces of the extant species remain, with its evolutionary course brought to a sudden and abrupt standstill, being flung across the abyss of nothingness.
As noted above, a potentially fruitful way of engaging with the disparate experiences of nothing is to consider patterns through which these may be configured -- notably patterns offering mnemonic associations to integrative symbols which continue to be active in cultural memory and a focus of long-term consideration of the implied paradoxes.
For example, the set above might be configured in a circle to imply the confluence of pressures and their enhancement through mutual reinforcement. This then also implies a higher dimensionality to the requisite cognitive reframing through which they might be more appropriately engaged. Use of concentric circles suggests degrees of such recognition. This might usefully integrate the degrees and stages of measures of "happiness", as with Gross National Happiness (GNH) developed in Bhutan, as might be understood in cognitive terms.
As currently understood, GNH is considered to be transcultural (rather than dependent on a Buddhist context) in its appreciation of sustainable development, cultural integrity, ecosystem conservation, and good governance. These "four pillars" of GNH have been given further specificity by the Centre for Bhutan Studies in the form of eight general contributors to happiness: physical, mental and spiritual health; time-balance; social and community vitality; cultural vitality; education; living standards; good governance; and ecological vitality. Such considerations have been incorporated into a Global GNH Survey.
An "8-fold" configuration then highlights the limitations of assumptions regarding the possibility of any "one-way" (cognitive) approach so typical of efforts at (global) strategic formulation. This then offers possible cognitive and mnemonic associations to (and from) the Noble Eightfold Path of Buddhist doctrine, the Eightfold Way of particle physics and the so-called Eightfold Path of policy analysis.
|Correspondences between the variety of eightfold ways|
The above configuration needs necessarily to be considered in alternative forms -- contrasting the sense of "nothingness" with the sense of "fulsomeness" through which the experience of nothingness can be so readily denied. Ironically "happiness" might well then be understood in terms of "fulsomeness" -- a "positive" denial of the "negativity" with which "nothingness" is so readily associated (Embodying the Paradoxes and Contradictions of the Pursuit of Happiness, 2011).
|8-fold patterns of nothingness|
|8-fold impulse from "nothingness" to "somethingness"
(and undermining the sense of "nothingness")
|8-fold pressure augmenting the experience of "nothingness"
(and undermining the sense of "fulsomeness")
Given the implicit cognitive alternation associated with the above configurations -- dramatically exemplified for some individuals by the phases of bipolar disorder -- the challenge could be framed as one of identifying forms which integrate those alternatives and the paradoxical dynamics between them. How to frame the process by which "everything" becomes "nothing" and "nothing" becomes "everything" -- notably explored in Buddhism as impermanence (David Hodge and Hi-Jin Hodge, Impermanence: embracing change, 2009). Appropriate to the cognitive ambiguity, the Theory of Everything of physicists has been speculatively "reframed" by Russell Standish (Theory of Nothing, 2006).
The following is one example of such a form in which each "way" is represented by the paradoxes of a Mobius loop rather than by the conventional linear directional arrow. The role of such a "strange loop" has been the focus of work by Douglas Hofstadter (I Am a Strange Loop, 2007), building on his earlier insights (Gödel, Escher, Bach: an Eternal Golden Braid, 1979). Used in this way, this then highlights the potential cognitive significance of the integration of the configuration of eight such loops, as implied below by the threading of a circle through the loops to form a "necklace" or "torc". In the sense in which each "bipolar way" integrates processes of creating and destroying "something", this is reminiscent of the significance traditionally attached to the necklace of the Hindu deity Kali -- a focus of dread, as the goddess of time and change, and notably of human redemption.
|8-fold representation as the "necklace of Kali"|
Another traditional configuration of interest is the significance held by the Ten Bulls (or Ox-Herding Pictures) of Zen Buddhism. Variously interpreted as increasing cognitive subtlety in engaging with otherness (understood as a "bull"), these might also be appropriately understood as the stages or learnings in engaging with the "bull" now so characteristic of government propaganda and "spin" (Transformation of Global Governance through Bullfighting, 2009). The pattern has also been related to degrees of self-reflexivity in responding to the global problematique (Progressive integration of the shadow of non-self-reflexivity, 2007).
As a further exemplification of the above argument, the traditional linear sequence of those "ox-herding" images can however be configured in a circle as follows.
Circular representation of the classic Ten Ox-Herding Pictures of Zen Buddhism
Adaptation into circular form of the traditional linear version in Wikipedia, as derived from
With respect to the above argument for an "eightfold way", it is appropriate to note that the last two images of the sequence relate to cognitive modalities transcending the 8 dynamics held by the Mobius strips in the earlier diagram -- effectively subsequent to the cognitive modality of the eighth. They might be understood as relating to the two distinct axes of the toroidal form of the "necklace" -- that threading the individual strips together and that associated with its wearer.
The circular configuration of 10 images could then be reconfigured (as below) into an 8-fold pattern with the two additional modalities (or dimensions) represented as overlapping, encompassing or englobing the first in the original sequence. This can be understood as reminiscent of another traditional image, namely that of the Ouroboros -- the dragon "biting" its tale -- as a symbol of cyclical recurrence, understood cognitively. Mnemonically, the two additional images can then be recognized either as the "eyes" or the "jaws" of the dragon.
|Suggestive reconfiguration of the above 10-fold circular ox-herding representation
into the form of an "8-fold way"
offering mnemonic associations to the cognitive vigilance implicit in the symbol of the Ouroboros
To the extent that the Mobius strips used in the "Kali necklace" configuration are visually reminiscent of the forms taken by feathers during bird flight, the toroidal form of the configuration is then suggestive of the feathered serpent deity of the Mesoamerican creation myth, as celebrated by William Irwin Thompson (Blue Jade from the Morning Star: an essay and a cycle of poems on Quetzalcoatl, 1983) and D. H. Lawrence (The Plumed Serpent, 1926). In addition to its association with worldwide variants of the myth of the "plumed-serpent" and the caduceus, it has been specifically associated with the Ouroboros, especially since the feathered-serpent is occasionally depicted as biting its tail (as shown above).
Thompson uses such myth to advocate an approach he terms Wissenkunst ("knowledge-art"), namely "the play of knowledge in a world of serious data-processors." (The Time Falling Bodies Take to Light: mythology, sexuality and the origins of culture, 1981) (Jeremy Johnson, Bridging Worlds of Myth and Science: the poetic scholarship of William Irwin Thompson, Beams and Struts: a magzine for hungry brains and thirsty souls, 2011).
The governance challenge of the future of cvilization has been fruitfully framed as one of navigating the adaptive cycle, notably by Thomas Homer-Dixon (The Upside of Down: Catastrophe, Creativity, and the Renewal of Civilization, 2006). The widespread tragic experience of "nothing", together with the high quality of the current "objective" reflection of astrophysicists on how experiential reality is engendered from "nothing", suggest an unexplored opportunity for reframing the potential of global governance.
One difficulty is the comprehensibility of the valuable insights of both the astrophysicists concerned with "nothing" and the systemic considerations relating to the adaptive cycle. Additionally both exclude the experiential dimension essential to the widespread credibility of such discourse. The question is how to embody such understanding (Psychology of Sustainability: embodying cyclic environmental processes, 2002). Geometry offers a key, especially given its metaphoric role in strategy formulation, as separately discussed (Way Round Cognitive Ground Zero and Pointlessness, 2012). Hence the focus on configuration in the argument above.
As an example, the "Kali necklace" configuration of "nothingness" (above) offers several fruitful associations. Whilst endeavouring to hold the paradoxical ambiguity of life experience in an "8-fold way", the image is however also suggestive of the design of both the supercolliders (used by physicist to advance their understanding of "nothing") and of the associated nuclear fusion reactors (offering hope for generating unlimited energy resources "from nothing"). Curiously these are reminiscent of the paradoxical traditional challenge of designing a container for that which can dissolve "anything" -- in this case the experiential sense of "nothingness".
It is possible that the cognitive patterns of such designs have implications for engaging more fruitfully with "nothingness" in the light of the arguments made separately for technomimicry (Engendering a Psychopter through Biomimicry and Technomimicry, 2011; Enactivating a Cognitive Fusion Reactor: Imaginal Transformation of Energy Resourcing, 2006; Massive Elicitation of Psychosocial Energy: Requisite technology for collective enlightenment, 2011). Is the experience of "nothingness" or "everythingness" to be associated with a cognitive analogue to the superconductivity essential to the design and operation of supercolliders (Hyperaction through Hypercomprehension and Hyperdrive, 2006)? Following the argument of the developer of the Bell helicopter, Arthur M. Young, techomimicry might then be a key to the design of what he named as a psychopter -- a "winged self" (The Geometry of Meaning, 1976).
Whether in controlling a helicopter or a fusion reactor, the cognitive challenges are usefully highlighted by the feather-like Mobius loops in the "Kali necklace" figure. Through their resemblance to feathers, they are especially reminiscent of the process of "feathering" used in the control of propellor blades, as a re-entry technique for spacecraft, or in alternately engaging and disengaging an automotive clutch. This cognitive "ambivalence" required in the experiential control of vehicles is echoed in the relevance of that metaphor to the blurring of edges in computer graphics. It is suggestive of liminality as the nature of the art of engaging experientially with nothingness (Living as an Imaginal Bridge between Worlds: global implications of "betwixt and between" and liminality, 2011).
The requisite cognitive modality might then be appropriately described as "hovering" -- notably with respect to those depicted in the final phases of the Zen Ox-herding images (above) or in articulations relating to mystical engagement with the mundane. It can be usefully explored in the light of the integrative patterning developed by Chris Lucas (What Difference Does It Make? Calresco, 2006). Is the quest for the "hovering-modality" of sustainability then to be compared with that for the "Holy Grail" of global governance (In Quest of Sustainability as Holy Grail of Global Governance, 2011)? It is in this sense that the circular dynamic of the figures above, complete with "tail-biting", is so suggestive of both civilizational self-destruction ("eating itself alive" through consumption of non-renewable resources) and the remedial potential of embodiment of the adaptive cycle as a means of enabling a form of civilizational immortality.
A further connotation is offered by failure to engage appropriately with the paradoxical implications of the Mobius strip, resulting in a reduction of complexity which could be understood as transforming understanding of the Mobius dynamic into a "thorn-like" problem through reification.\ and "misplaced concreteness". Rather than the cognitive implications of the Kali-necklace or torc, the latter is then usefully depicted as a "crown of thorns", as separately discussed (Implication of Toroidal Transformation of the Crown of Thorns, 2010). The "hovering" to be sustained by a pattern of cognitive "feathering" is then appropriately explored through fluid dynamics, as in work of Douglas Hofstadtert (Fluid Concepts and Creative Analogies, 1995), or in the light of that of Viktor Schauberger, as discussed separately (Enabling Governance through the Dynamics of Nature: exemplified by cognitive implication of vortices and helicoidal flow, 2010).
Of further potential relevance to the future efficacy of governance is the widespread perception (by the "99%") that those at the highest level (the "1%") are primarily concerned with "feathering their own nest". This refers to the use of power and prestige by the latter to provide selfishly for themselves. Curiously this is reminiscent of a pattern which is a major preoccupation of astrophysics, namely black holes centered on gravitational singularities -- with the the universe itself understood as originating from such a singularity. As a pattern, "singularity" has been appropriated to recognize a technological singularity. Of greater relevance to the above argument is recognition of a memetic form (Emerging Memetic Singularity in the Global Knowledge Society, 2009).
Nothingness is often described by those experiencing it as a "black hole", effectively a singularity framing the totality of their experience. In astrophysics singularities are distinguished according to whether they are covered or "cloaked" by an event horizon or not, namely whether light (and information) regarding them can be perceived from elsewhere. Appropriately this pattern, in its cloaked form, is shared both by those experiencing "nothingness" and by those experiencing "everythingness" -- as an incomprehensible transcendence of normal understanding, impossible for others to appreciate. In the case of those few amassing unimaginable wealth through "feathering their own nest", as "black holes" in the social system they necessarily operate in a realm in which their activities are effectively cloaked.
The lack of transparency associated with such "holes" is compounded by the evident complicity of governance and the military-industrial complex -- inspiring every form of conspiracy theory. Curiously this effective censorship of information regarding them is consistent with the pattern explored by astrophysics, namely the cosmic censorship hypothesis. It can of course also be seen in the pattern of systemic "ignorance" and denial regarding the condition of nothingness experienced by so many. The issue was highlighted by Donald N. Michael (Leadership's shadow: the dilemma of denial, Futures, 1994) as separately discussed (The Future of Leadership: reframing the unknown, 1994) to which the notion of "dragons" may well be relevant (Tom Munnecke, Let There Be Dragons: ways of managing the unknown. 2002). The serpent-like dragon, curled as guardian around the sacred tree of supernal knowlege (notably in the Garden of the Hesperides), is common to the mythology of the Abrahamic religions.
As a holding pattern, both the "Kali necklace" and the feathered-serpent Queztlacoatl, embody the serpentine connotations of the challenge of engaging vigilantly with the dangers of chaos. Appropriately the serpent metaphor has been explicitly used in recognizing the nature of the instabilities of plasma in a toroidal fusion reactor -- as with those of the financial system -- and in understanding the design requirements to govern them appropriately. The art of governing both might well be described as implicit in "feathering" the "serpent" -- as in the creation myth with which Quetztlacoatl and other "plumed serpents" are associated.
The numerous efforts to suggest the dynamics of a feathered-serpent through imagery, as with the many currently appreciated animations and enactments of the dragon, are suggestive of an imaginative confluence of requisite insight into the "operation" of what is traditionally symbolized by the Ouroboros. With the increasing role of China in global civilization, it is perhaps extremely appropriate that an argument in terms of "Wissenkunst" should be made at the start of the much-anticipated Year of the Dragon (Year of the Dragon brings promise of change, CBC News, 22 January 2012; Chinese New Year 2012 rings in Year of the Dragon, EarthSky: a clear voice for science, 22 January 2012; Year of The Water Dragon: 12 Chinese maritime developments to look for in 2012, The Wall Street Journal, 23 January 2012).
Edwin Abbott Abbott. Flatland: a romance of many dimensions. Seely and Co, 1884 [summary]
Christopher Alexander. The Timeless Way of Building. New York, Oxford University Press, 1979
Arlene Babst. Xeniteia. National Book Store Pub., 1982
John D. Barrow. The Book of Nothing: vacuums, voids, and the latest ideas about the origins of the universe. Random House, 2002
Linda A. Wimer Brakel. On Knowing the Unconscious: lessons from the epistemology of geometry and space. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 75, 1994, pp. 39-49 [abstract]
Neil Campbell, Jude Davies and George McKay. Issues In Americanisation and Culture. Edinburgh University Press, 2004
Roberto Casati and Achille C. Varzi. Holes and Other Superficialities. MIT Press, 1994
Ray Comfort. Nothing Created Everything: the scientific impossibility of atheistic evolution. WND Books, 2009 [commentary]
James Cowan. Journey to the Inner Mountain. Hodder and Stoughton, 2002
Edward de Bono. Water Logic. McQuaig Group, 1993
Dionys Burger. Sphereland: a fantasy about curved spaces and an expanding universe. Barnes and Noble, 1965 [summary]
Terrence W. Deacon:
Max Deutscher. Subjecting and Objecting : an essay in objectivity. University of Queensland Press, 1983
A. K. Dewdney. The Planiverse: computer contact with a two-dimensional world, Springer, 2000 [summary]
Duane Elgin. Voluntary simplicity: toward a way of life that is outwardly simple, inwardly rich. Quill, 1993
Michael Foley. The Age of Absurdity: why modern life makes it hard to be happy. Simon and Schuster, 2011
John R. Gregg. Ones and Zeros: understanding boolean algebra, digit circuits and the logivc of sets. IEEE Press, 1998
Stephen Hawking (Ed.). The Dreams That Stuff Is Made Of: the most astounding papers of quantum physics -- and how they shook the scientific world. Running Press, 2011
James Heisig. Philosophers of Nothingness: an essay on the Kyoto School. University of Hawaii Press, 2002
David Hodge and Hi-Jin Hodge. Impermanence: embracing change. Snow Lion Publications, 2009
Thomas Homer-Dixon. The Upside of Down: Catastrophe, Creativity, and the Renewal of Civilization. Island Press, 2006 [summary]
Dennis Merritt Jones. The Art of Uncertainty: how to kive in the mystery of life and love it. Tarcher, 2011
Norton Juster. The Dot and the Line: a romance in lower mathematics. Random House, 1963 [summary] [animation]
Robert Kaplan and Ellen Kaplan. The Nothing That Is: a natural history of zero. Oxford University Press, 2000
Robert Kegan. In Over Our Heads: the mental demands of modern life. Harvard University Press, 1994.
Orrin E. Klapp:
Lawrence Krauss. A Universe from Nothing: why there is something rather than nothing. Free Press, 2011
Joshtrom Isaac Kureethadam. Banished behind the Curtain of Nothingness: the ecological problem of species extinction [text]
R. D. Laing:
D. H. Lawrence:
Richard Lehrer and Daniel Chazan (Eds.). Designing Learning Environments for Developing Understanding of Geometry and Space. Routledge, 1998
Emmanuel Levinas. Totality and Infinity: an essay on exteriority. Duquesne University Press, 1969
James Lovelock. The Vanishing Face of Gaia: a final warning: enjoy it while youc can. Allen Lane, 2009
Jim McKnight. A Procrastinator's Guide to Simple Living. Melbourne University Press, 2001
Donald Michael. Leadership's shadow: the dilemma of denial. Futures, 26, 10, December 1994 [text]
Angelos Mouzakitis. Worlds Emerging: approaches to the creation and constitution of the common. In: Nathalie Karagiannis and Peter Wagner (Eds.), Varieties of World Making: beyond globalization. Liverpool University Press, 2006, pp. 232-246
Daniel Pinchbeck. 2012: the Return of Quetzalcoatl. Jeremy P. Tarcher, 2006
Nicholas Rescher. The Strife of Systems: an essay on the grounds and implications of philosophical diversity. University of Pittsburgh Press, 1985
Jeremy Rifkin. Time Wars: the primary conflict in human history. Henry Holt, 1987
George Ritzer and Zeynep Atalay (Eds.). Readings in Globalization: Key Concepts and Major Debates. Wiley-Blackwell, 2010
Steven M. Rosen:
Brian Rotman. Signifying Nothing: the semiotics of zero. Stanford University Press, 1993
Rudy Rucker. Spaceland: a novel of the fourth dimension. Tor Books, 2003 [summary]
Bernard N. Schumacher. Death and Mortality in Contemporary Philosophy. Cambridge University Press, 2011
John H. Simpson. Varieties of Imagination and Nothingness. The Canadian Journal of Sociology, 28, 2, Spring, 2003 [text]
Russell Standish. Theory of Nothing. BookSurge Australia, 2006
Victor J. Stenger:
Charles Seife. Zero: The Biography of a Dangerous Idea. Penguin, 2000
Howard A. Snyder and Joel Scandrett. Salvation Means Creation Healed: the ecology of sin and grace. Cascade Books, 2011
William Irwin Thompson:
R. R. Traill. Physics and Philosophy of the Mind. Melbourne: Ondwelle, 2000
Margaret Wertheim. Physics on the Fringe: smoke rings, circlons and alternative Theories of Everything. Walker, 2011
Arthur M. Young. Geometry of Meaning. Delacorte Press, 1976
For further updates on this site, subscribe here