- / -
1. What questions have not been asked?
2. Is any checklist of questions, asked and unasked, maintained as a source of collective learning?
3. Who ensured that the unasked questions were designed off the table?
4. What agenda is served by not asking particular questions?
5. What pressures are applied to those endeavouring to ask those questions, and what penalties result from asking them?
6. What is not addressed through the framing provided by the questions which are asked?
7. Will providing a satisfactory answer to the questions asked resolve the issue -- or will the issue re-emerge, perhaps reinforced, in a new form on a subsequent occasion?
8. Does allocation of resources to the question asked ensure that no resources are allocated to those that are not?
9. Do previous strategic challenges offer examples of ignoring uncomfortable questions -- and failing to learn from them?
10. Does the strategic focus on isolating (and eliminating) a primary cause serve primarily to assuage public opinion by enabling "Mission Accomplished" to be declared?
11. By addressing symptoms, does the quest for symbols of rapid closure through conventional strategies serve to avoid any need for rethinking on how to address more deep-seated systemic ills?
12. How vulnerable is a society rendered, whether through failure to ask such questions or through the lack of higher orders of thinking it indicates as being necessary?
A "13th question", might well be: what are the questions to which no one in authority wants an answer?
The most serious mistakes are not being made as a result of wrong answers.
The editorial of the issue on What Went Wrong in Afghanistan (Foreign Policy, March/April 2013) -- a special report on "12 years of getting it wrong" -- is remarkably clear on the manner in which strategic issues were not discussed at the highest levels with regard to Afghanistan. The issue features a "gloves off" article by insider Vali Nasr (How Obama Let Diplomacy Fail in Afghanistan) summarizing arguments elaborated in a book (Dispensable Nation: American Foreign Policy in Retreat, 2013). His argument could be reviewed in terms of a set of unasked questions. For example, Nasr makes the point that with respect to the US administration's handling of Afghanistan:
... my time in the Obama administration turned out to be a deeply disillusioning experience. The truth is that his administration made it extremely difficult for its own foreign policy experts to be heard... On the campaign trail, Obama repeatedly stressed that he wanted to get things right in the broader Middle East, reversing the damage that had resulted from the previous administration's reliance on faulty intelligence and its willingness to apply military solutions to problems it barely understood.
Not only did that not happen, but the president had the disturbing habit of of funnelling major foreign-policy decisions through a small cabal of relatively inexperienced White House advisors whose turf was strictly politics. Their primary concern was how any action in Afghanistan or the Middle East would play on the nightly news, or which talking point it would give to the Republicans. The Obama administration's reputation for competence on foreign policy has less to do with its accomplishments in Afghanistan or the Middle East than how the U.S. actions in that region have been reshaped to accommodate partisan political concerns.
In the case of the Boston Marathon bombings, as announced by FBI Special Agent in Charge, Richard DesLauriers (Remarks of at Press Conference on Bombing Investigation, 18 April 2013):
The FBI Boston's Joint Terrorism Task Force, composed of more than 30 federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies, including Boston Police, Massachusetts State Police, and ATF, HSI, United States Secret Service, and others responded to the scene. Many of them were already there as part of the general security for the marathon already in place.
The entire focus of the investigation, and the resources deployed, was on identifying the perpetrators. This recalls the framing of the military intervention in Afghanistan and the focus on the elimination of Osama bin Laden. The emphasis in both cases is on bringing an individual "to justice" -- to make the individual "pay" -- and on the prevention of future perpetration of such incidents. No reference is made as to the causes engendering such incidents, except that by implication they are clearly the work of deranged, even evil, minds -- disruptive of a satisfactory status quo.
Questions might be usefully raised regarding the justification for the numbers deployed in the Boston area. CNN indicated that more than 9,000 law enforcement officers, many armed with shotguns and automatic rifles, were sent to the suburb of Boston in the quest for a single individual. By comparison, Britain, the second largest contributor to NATO's Afghanistan operation, currently has about 9,000 troops in that arena. At what point might the response in Boston be challenged as "overreaction" or "overkill" -- especially if the latter proves literally to be the case? (Steven Rosenfeld, How Absurd: 8 crazy reactions, ridiculous conclusions, and dumb media behavior coming out of the Boston bombings, AlterNet, 19 April 2013; Paul Campos, The Boston Bomber Brothers Got the Attention They Wanted, AlterNet, 20 April 2013).
If the city is in "lock down" in response to the threat from a single individual, what does this imply for a situation in which the number of suspects constituted a group of 10 or 100?
The pattern of response is reminiscent of a lynch mob mentality, now exacerbated by a modern media frenzy -- as indicated by the extent of coverage of the Boston marathon bombings. This of course contrasts remarkably with the minimalistic coverage of the many "incidents" involving far greater number of deaths in Syria, Iraq, Iran, Pakistan and Afghanistan -- in which families are notably disrupted by the death of innocent children and bystanders.
Following the controversies over "enhanced interrogation" (aka torture), extraordinary rendition, and imprisonment without trial for extended periods, the interaction between the erosion of collective morality and the erosion of legality is increasingly evident, as highlighted with respect to increasing use of drones by Maureen Dowd (The C.I.A.'s Angry Birds, The New York Times, 16 April 2013).
It would seem that the assertive declaration (now frequently made by authorities in response to disaster) that "all the options are on the table" somehow only includes those that reflect the pattern of questions asked, excluding those neglected by failure to ask more radically appropriate questions (Framing the Global Future by Ignoring Alternatives: unfreezing categories as a vital necessity, 2009; Considering All the Strategic Options -- whilst ignoring alternatives and disclaiming cognitive protectionism, 2009). How to prove that no options have been ignored when some argue specifically, citing opportunities ignored, that this is clearly not the case? How are "non-negotiable" options to be reconciled with such a declaration?
The rationalization of "printing money", under the euphemism of quantitative easing (to avert financial bankruptcy), can increasingly be seen as extended to a form of "qualitative easing" with respect to morality (From Quantitative Easing (QE) to Moral Easing (ME): a stimulus package to avert moral bankruptcy? 2010). Whether or not moral equivalence is claimed or denied (cf. Jeane Kirkpatrick, The Myth of Moral Equivalence, Imprimis, January 1986), the approach evokes the possibility of an unquestionable pattern of "be done by as you did" -- which lends itself to speculative reflection (Writing Guidelines for Future Occupation of Earth by Extraterrestrials: be done by as you did? 2010). Offering a degree of reality to that speculation is the announcement, at the time of writing, that NASA has discovered the most Earth-like planets yet -- orbiting distant stars.
Curiously the process of eliciting and pandering to a lynch mob mentality may be seen as consistent -- but perversely, to the longer-term disadvantage of society -- with that associated problematically with engendering popular consent (Edward Bernays, Crystallizing Public Opinion, 2011, Propaganda, 1928; Noam Chomsky and Edward S. Herman, Manufacturing Consent: the political economy of the mass media, 1988). How then to recognize the possibility of groupthink and its consequences for "intelligence failure" -- and to enable corrective measures? How then to address the systemic challenge of question avoidance (Question Avoidance, Evasion, Aversion and Phobia: why we are unable to escape from traps, 2006)?
More problematic is the degree to which it can be suspected that information released to the public during the course of any disaster is designed to ramp up knee-jerk responses and the justification for them. The pattern is in process of being documented in relation to the Boston Marathon bombings (Julie Lévesque, The Boston Bombing Web of Lies, Global Research, 26 April 2013; Alex Seitz-Wald, The "Facts" Keep Changing About the Boston Bombings -- and it's fueling a conspiracy theory industry, AlterNet, April 2013).
The difficulty is that a related pattern is evident in relation to increasing concerns regarding the continuing conflict in Syria and the possible use of "chemical weapons" (Stephen Lendman, Fabricated Intelligence and the WMD Pretext: Obama heads closer to war on Syria, Global Research, 25 April 2013; David Edwards, Won't Get Fooled Again? Hyping Syria's WMD 'Threat', Media Lens, 13 December 2012). The existence of such "evidence" has now been confirmed by David Cameron (Alan Cowell and Hwaida Saad, British Leader Says Evidence of Chemical Warfare in Syria Is Limited but Growing, The New York Times, 26 April 2013).
There is no capacity to question the credibility of such statements in the light of the widely noted falsity of the earlier declaration formally made by Colin Powell to the United Nations Security Council on 5 February 2003 in order to enable intervention in Iraq -- and the associated misrepresentation of "evidence" by the British Prime Minister at that time. There is no question of asking what might be the source of the chemical weapons or their precursors -- just as questions are avoided regarding the source of the arms used in Syria or in other arenas of bloody conflict. The logic recalls the primary argument presented in response to gun control campaigners by the US National Rifle Association: Guns don't kill people, people do. It is not clear why this argument does not also apply to "chemical weapons" or to the considerable concern with regard to acquisition of nuclear weapons by Iran. There is accumulating evidence that white phosphorus has been variously employed over the past decade, notably by those concerned about its claimed use in Syria.
Why are authoritative statements about the accumulation of "evidence" now to be taken seriously in the light of the past pattern of misrepresentation? How is any authority with the power to misrepresent the facts now able to prove that the evidence is not tainted in some way and has not been subject to various forms of tampering? As with the request made of Iran, what form should "concrete proof" now take with respect to other matters of concern, as separately discussed (10 Demands for Concrete Proof by We the Peoples of the World, 2012). Is the visual evidence of the use of bombs to be taken as valid evidence -- given that "false flag" operations may well be justified to decision makers by reasons of "national security", as has happened in the past? The question now is not what is to be construed as "evidence", but rather how much would it cost to fake that "evidence" credibly, and to whom is the price worth paying? (Politicization of Evidence in the Plastic Turkey Era al-Qaida, Saddam, Assassination and the Hijab, 2003).
Modern advertising campaigns of any kind, especially with respect to competing products, increasingly make the issue comprehensible to many. The use of superlatives by each, to claim originality and superiority, can only imply that one or both are lying -- with little possibilty of being credibly challenged.
As suggested by Vali Nasr with respect to Afghanistan, there is a case for exploring the matter otherwise -- as is most notably evident in the work of Josh Kerbel for the US intelligence community as a consequence of 9/11. Nasr cites Richard Holbrooke with respect to strategic formulation by the latter's team on Afghanistan:
I want you to learn nothing from government...This place is dead intellectually. It does not produce any ideas; it is all about turf battles and checking the box. Your job is to break through all this.
As implied by Nasr, the past decade in the Afghanistan arena would seem to have demonstrated that strategy is elaborated and implemented by "know-it-alls" -- lacking any ability to question the basis for their own confidence (Transforming the Unsustainable Cost of General Education: strategic insights from Afghanistan, 2009). This despite the widely remarked admission regarding the existence of unknown unknowns by the former Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, as discussed separately (Unknown Undoing: challenge of incomprehensibility of systemic neglect, 2008).
As demonstrated in that arena, claiming to have all the answers precludes the possibility of asking new questions to enable learning. Politicians and economists exhibit the same tendency with regard to the current economic crisis -- despite the historically unprecedented escalation in the numbers of unemployed as a conequence of their policies (12 Mindsets Ensuring Disappearance of Employment Opportunities, 2012). Why waste time -- exhibiting doubt and uncertainty to those who expect the provision of answers to be a primary characteristic of leadership (The Future of Leadership: reframing the unknown, 1994). To what extent does strategic leadership require the capacity to ask new questions, to encourage such questions to be asked, and to embody the negative capability extolled by the poet John Keats?
Is it possible to identify the new questions of value through which current leadership has reframed the challenges of the times? Is a leader to be remembered by the questions asked? Alternatively, is the historical legacy of a leader who failed to respond creatively to such challenges to be best recognized through a particular question that was not asked?
What questions can the present ask that makes a mockery of the past and frames it as quaint -- perhaps worthy of the ridicule in which it is currently held? What questions may the future then ask that will frame the present as quaint -- perhaps worthy of ridicule in its turn?
Why is it that a commerical group, Dassault Systems -- part of the Dassault Group, reknowned for its manufacture of military equipment -- should have launched a worlwide media campaign under the slogan If we ask the right questions, we can change the world? Can one imagine this being done by any part of the United Nations system, the European Commission, or any government?
One possibility is by "question substitution", as argued by Daniel Kahneman (Answering An Easier Question, In: Thinking Fast and Slow, 2011). In response to a complex "hard" question regarding difficult problems, this involves finding a related question which it is easier to solve. He describes the substitute as a "heuristic question". He addresses to some degree whether this substituted question offers useful insights into the difficult question. A concern is obviously whether the substitution obscures the original question, which then remains "unasked", whilst giving some measure of satisfaction through addressing the easier one
The art of interrogation -- notably as applied to any terrorist suspect -- then elicits a semblance of orderly "explanation" to the satisfaction of the interrogators, who may well feel no need to question their own methodology and the framing of reality it ensures. As with science more generally, however, its methods are vulnerable to arguments such as the following articulated by Norman Campbell:
... we accomplish the apparently miraculous feat of reducing a chaotic world to order because we carefully confine our attention and our efforts only to those portions which we find can be ordered (The Foundations of Science, 1920)
For Elaine Scarr (Thinking in an Emergency, 2011):
The seduction against thinking in an emergency comes... from two sources: first, from a false opposition between thinking and acting; second, from a plausible (but in the end, false) opposition between thinking and rapid action. Now a third, equally potent, form of seduction becomes visible: the acts of thinking that go on in emergencies are not recognized by us as acts of thinking. We misrecognize them More precisely, we correctly recognize the presence of habits in these mental acts but incorrectly conclude that habit is incompatible with, or empty of, thought. We are therefore willing to set these mental acts aside. Our derisive attitude toward habit prevents us from seeing the form of thinking embedded in these cognitive acts and hence makes us willing to give up, or set aside, the most powerful mental tools that stand ready to assist us. (pp. 14-15)
It could be argued that a disaster is effectively a natural memorial to an asked question. This condition of systemic neglect is likely to be compounded by the process famously identified by George Santayana: Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
Better questions: Curiously Scarr, in her focus on habit, fails to discuss the role of questioning, and asking the right question. This is a theme increasingly evoked as a means of eliciting a fruitful mode of action (Stephen Wunker, Asking the Right Question, Forbes, 15 December 2012; Michael Hyatt, The Power of Asking the Right Question, 18 January 2012; Hal Gregersen, How to Ask the Right Question, 3 April 2013; Irene Leonard, The Art of Effective Questioning: asking the right question for the desired result; Chris Legard, Asking the Right Question, BBC Word of Mouth, 17 July 2012; M. Neil Browne and Stuart M. Keeley, Asking the Right Questions: A Guide to Critical Thinking, 2011).
What then are "better questions", as variously asked (Norah Morgan and Juliana Saxton, Asking Better Questions, 2006; William F. McComas and Linda Abraham, Asking More Effective Questions, CET; Jeremy Statton, How to Ask Better Questions; Steven Heller, The Quest to Ask Better Questions, The Atlantic, 3 May 2012; Warren Berger, A More Beautiful Question; Mary Thomas Farrar, Asking Better Questions, The Reading Teacher, 1984). How does this process recognize any "unasked question"?
It could then be asked how such insights could have been better applied with respect to the strategy of intervention in Afghanistan. A perceptive question was asked in that connection by Ziauddin Sardar and Merryl Wyn Davies (Why Do People Hate America? 2002) -- an approach explored by others (Donald Cuccioletta, Why do they hate US? Unilateralism and the rise of anti-Americanism, Inroads: A Journal of Opinion, 1 January 2004). The challenge for the individual or group concerned, in asking such perceptive questions, can be usefully compared to the challenge of body odour. Put bluntly: One "stinks" more than one thinks. This can even be clearly observed in the relationships between leaders of the most progressive movements, as separately discussed (Epistemological Challenge of Cognitive Body Odour: exploring the underside of dialogue, 2006).
Public relations consultants have long responded to recognition that any "body corporate" may well suffer from an odour problem -- however the distinction is to be made metaphorically between "body odour", "halitosis", and "flatulence" (Obama's Economic Spin: a new pony or manure stink? Conservative Read, 2012; The stench of tobacco industry dirty linen, Tobacco Control, 2000; Greed, spin and bonuses: why our banks stink, The Times, 14 March 2013; By Any Other Name, Goldman's Spin of the Revolving Door Would Still Stink, CBS News, 19 August 2011). The metaphor may be fruitfully associated with current issues (Sins of Hot Air Emission, Omission, Commission and Promission: the political challenge of responding to global crises, 2009).
A contrasting challenge to perceptiveness is that associated with happiness -- the much-cited preoccupation with "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness" in the United States Declaration of Independence, and that of Bhutan with respect to gross national happiness. There is increasing concern that the quality of happiness experienced is not what might be hoped. Much effort is put into public relations and "spin" to disguise both how one's initiatives "stink" to others and to disguise the unease with regard to the sense of happiness. The associated dilemma is well explored with respect to the USA in a book variously titled by Barbara Ehrenreich (Bright-sided: How the Relentless Promotion of Positive Thinking Has Undermined America, 2009; Smile Or Die: How Positive Thinking Fooled America and the World, 2010).
The array of so-called "WH-questions" might then be applied to both cases as follows:
(think: Guantanamo Bay, targetted assassination,
and innocent civilians killed by drone strikes)
(think: Life, Liberty,
and the Pursuit of Happiness)
|Does the Statue of Liberty have a body odour problem?
Or, as with garlic eating cultures, is it just a question of getting used to it,
growing to like it, and ignoring the effect on others?
Why do web facilities and encyclopedias focus on providing answers -- precluding recognition of questions? Why is there no open source equivalent to Wikipedia -- for questions held to be as yet unanswered? The World Question Center of the Edge Foundation offers one approach -- through questioning its members. Another has been the generation of questions implicit in the focus of international constituencies (Generating a Million Questions from UIA Databases: Problems, Strategies, Values, 2006).
Other possibilities for consideration can be variously argued:
The matter and the response can be reframed by analogy in terms of the medical response to a health issue, following the approach of Donald Schon, with respect to generative metaphor and frame setting. Massive urgent use of first aid resources may indeed be justified in response to the symptoms. However, if the crisis arises from a pattern of questionable behaviour -- drugs, alcohol, lifestyle -- with a tendency to engender the medical issue in the future (as with the metastasis of cancer), then questions can be usefully asked, such as:
Given the questions raised by Nasr regarding "negotiation with the enemy" (a challenge currently evident in the case of the Taliban or Iran), also of interest is to ask how the engagement between "others" could be radically reframed to mutual advantage -- and why such exploration is avoided. Especially problematic are cases of the affirmation of the "other" as being evil, most notably by Barack Obama on the occasion of his acceptance speech for the Nobel Peace Prize and by the current US Secretary of State in relation to the Boston Marathon bombings (Remarks by the President at the Acceptance of the Nobel Peace Prize, 10 December 2009; John Kerry: We've been in direct confrontation with evil, BBC News, 19 April 2013). The difficulty is that Obama is himself framed as "evil" by many of his fellow citizens, just as the Christian-inspired US is framed as "satanic" by many of Islamic inspiration -- and the favour is returned. Some would argue that opposing political parties in a democracy tend to see each other as fundamentally misguided, if not essentially evil in their inspiration. These incommensurable framings suggest the need for allocation of significant resources to transcending their limitations. As argued by Sam Keen (Radical Questions for Critical Times):
Your question is the quest you're on. No questions -- no journey. Timid questions -- timid trips. Radical questions -- an expedition to the root of your being.
At the time of writing, various parties are envisaging a new approach to the challenges of terrorism in the USA, as indicated by Amy Zalman (Post-Boston: Keep Calm and Think Clearly (Part I), The Gobalist, 23 April 2013). Less clear is whether the quality of questions is itself being addressed or whether the emphasis is on "more of the same", because it is familiar and can be framed as "effective". The lesson of Afghanistan is that this knee-jerk strategic reflex is not as adequate as is so readily portrayed.
How is the quality of more appropriate questions to be distinguished from that characteristic of the political, military and intelligence failures of the past? Is asking potentially more fruitful questions, or creating a context in which they may be evoked, itself dangerous for those involved, as explored with respect to overpopulation (Overpopulation Debate as a Psychosocial Hazard: development of safety guidelines from handling other hazardous materials, 2009).
Contrasting possibilities for reframing such negotiation, as previously argued, include:
A remarkably succinct account of the issues implied by the above is provided by the social activist and human rights campaigner Fran Peavey (Strategic Questioning: an approach to creating personal and social change). This concludes with the following summary:
Is there evidence of such questioning in relation to either the Afghanistan arena or the Boston Marathon bombings? Where is such evidence? How credible is it?
Curiously participation in the Boston Marathon, as for participation in military activity in Afghanistan, is fundamentally a matter of honour. Moral equivalence aside, this is equally true for "competitors" and "combatants" of whatever colour, justifying for themselves the extremes to which they are prepared to go. As a fundamental value, appropriate strategic questioning is therefore intimately entangled with honour, as can be more generally argued (Honour Essential to Psycho-social Integrity, 2005).
Immediately following the Boston Marathon bombings, killing 3 and injuring 264, the world was witness to the collapse of a sweatshop factory in Bangladesh -- with the death of some 400 and over 1,000 injured. Given the intense current effort to trace connectivity, and frame explanations with regard to the bombings, why is it irrelevant to ask how many of those involved in any way with the Boston Marathon wore garments sourced at low cost from that factory (Richard M. Locke, Can Global Brands Create Just Supply Chains? Boston Review, May/June 2013; Henry Farrell, The Bangladesh Catastrophe and International Supply Chains, Crooked Timber, 29 April 2013). Why is it equally irrelevant to ask how many associated with the Marathon have been in some way associated with the military intervention in Afghanistan and its far greater fatalities for both coalition forces and Afghan civilians? (Identification of Bullets: human right and human responsibility? 2009).
As a matter of personal strategy, how might a comparison be made between the honourable self-questioning associated with jihadi suicide missions in Afghanistan and that of veterans suiciding as a consequence of endeavouring to combat it? (Suicide Rate Among Vets and Active Duty Military Jumps: Now 22 a Day, Forbes, 5 February 2013).
Kim-Ha Albert. Background of Distrust, Prelude to Betrayal: America's unaddressed questions lead to culture of coverups. Empire Know More, 12 August 2010 [text]
James C. Anderson. The Impact of Unexamined Assumptions and Beliefs on Organizational Learning: a grounded theoryinvestigation. ProQuest, 2008
Stephanie Zubcic. The Unexamined Assumptions of Science, Technology, and Space Travel: rethinking the ethics of responsible knowledge with Hannah Arendt. 2005 [abstract]
Lawrence Auster. Global Democratization: the unasked questions. American Thinker, 13 January 2013 [text]
Katherine T. Bartlett. Minow's Social Relations Approach to Difference: Answering the Unasked. Law and Social Inquiry, 1992, pp. 437-470 [text]
Ulrich Beck and Danilo Zolo. What Is Globalization? Some Radical Questions. Jura Gentium: Rivista di filosofia del diritto internazionale e della politica globale [text]
Patricia E. Blosser. Ask the Right Questions. NSTA, 2000 [text]
Julie Browne. Unasked Questions or Unheard Answers? Policy Development in Child Sexual Abuse. British Journal of Social Work, 26, 1996, pp. 37-52 [abstract]
M. Neil Browne and Stuart Keeley. Asking the Right Questions. Prentice-Hall, 2001, 6th ed.
Adan Cabello. How Many Questions Do You Need to Prove that Unasked Questions Have No Answers? International Journal of Quantum Information, 04, 55, 2006, [abstract]
Karen A. Cerulo. Never Saw It Coming: cultural challenges to envisioning the worst. University of Chicago Press, 2006
Erwin Chemerinsky. The Price of Asking the Wrong Question: an essay on constitutional scholarship and judicial review. 1984 [text]
Noam Chomsky and Edward S. Herman. Manufacturing Consent: the political economy of the mass media. Pantheon, 1988
Angelo V. Ciardiello. Did you ask a good question today? Alternative cognitive and metacognitive strategies. Journal of Adoleescent and Adult Literacy, 42, 1998, 3, pp. 210-219
Benjamin W. Cramer. Unasked Questions and Unquestioned Answers: the perils of assuming diversity in modern telecommunications policy. Communication Law and Policy, 17, 2012, 3 [abstract]
Critical Thinking Community. The Role of Questions in Teaching, Thinking and Learning [text]
Donald Cuccioletta. Why do they hate US? Unilateralism and the rise of anti-Americanism. Inroads: A Journal of Opinion, 1 January 2004 [text]
Elliott Currie. Sociology of Law: the unasked questions. The Yale Law Journal, 81, 1971, 1, pp. 134-147 [abstract]
Bill Dahl. Questioning the Unquestioned Answers. The Porpoise Diving Life [text]
Avi Dan. Kodak Failed By Asking The Wrong Marketing Question. Forbes, 23 January 2012 [text]
Ginette Delandshere. Implicit Theories, Unexamined Assumptions and the Status Quo of Educational Assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 8, 2001, 2, pp. 113-133 [abstract]
Christopher Dickey. Unmentioned and Unmentionable: What Romney Left Out. The Daily Beast, 23 October 2012 [text]
Peter F. Drucker. The Five Most Important Questions You Will Ever Ask About Your Organization. Jossey-Bass, 2008
Europe Intelligence Wire. Suppressed questions on path to apocalypse. 25 January 2006 [text]
Faculty of Education. Common Pitfalls of Questioning. University of Cambridge, 2012 [text]
Terry J. Fadem. The Art of Asking: Neglected Questions. In: The Art of Asking: Ask Better Questions, Get Better Answers. FT Press, 2009
Richard A. Fineberg. Unaddressed Questions: Critical Questions about the State's Findings on the TransCanada AGIA Proposal to Deliver North Slope Natural Gas to Commercial Markets. 2008 [text]
Grant A. Fleming. Some Neglected Questions on the "professionalisation" of Economic. 1988
Debbie Ford. The Right Questions: ten essential questions to guide you to an extraordinary life. HarperOne, 2004
Louise Fortmanna. Bonanza! The Unasked Questions: domestic land tenure through international lenses. Society and Natural Resources, 9, 1996, 5, pp. 537-547 [abstract]
George Gerbner. TV Violence and the Art of Asking the Wrong Question. Center for Media Literacy, July, 1994 [text]
Jock Gill. The Fascinating Unasked Questions of the Bush Administration and the News Media. Democrats.com [text]
Rachel Giora. Coda: Unaddressed Questions -- Food for Future Thought. In: On Our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language, Oxford Scholarship Online, 2003 [text]
E. Richard Gold, et. al. The Unexamined Assumptions of Intellectual Property. Public Affairs Quarterly, 18, 2004, 4, pp. 299-344 [abstract]
Anthony Gregory. Some Neglected Questions on the Attempted Fort Hood Attack. FFF Articles, 29 July 2011 [text]
James W. Guthrie. Unasked Questions. Harvard Educational Review, Winter 1981 [abstract]
Mark Howell. The Danger of Unexamined Assumptions. Strategy Central, 7 October 2009 [text]
Robert Huebscher. Gundlach: Investors are asking the Wrong Question. Advisor Perspectives, 12 March 2013 [text]
Portia Bell Hume and Joan V. Bondurant. The Significance of Hnasked Questions in the Study of Conflict. Inquiry: an Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 7, 1964, 1-4 [text]
John Howard Association of Illinois. Unasked Questions, Unintended Consequences. 2012 [text]
Garrett Jones. Israel and Iran: Everyone Is Asking the Wrong Question. Foreign Policy Research Institute, March 2012 [text]
Daniel Kahneman. Answering An Easier Question. In: Thinking Fast and Slow. Penguin, 2011, pp. 97-105
Sheila Suess Kennedy. Privatization and Social Capital: Unasked Questions, 2005 [text]
Jeane Kirkpatrick. The Myth of Moral Equivalence. Imprimis, 15, 1986, 1 [text]
Philip Kitcher and Nancy Cartwright. Science and Ethics: reclaiming some neglected questions. 1996 [abstract]
P. Komesaroff and I. Kerridge. It is time to move beyond a culture of unexamined assumptions, recrimination, and blame to one of systematic analysis and ethical dialogue. American Journal of Bioethics. 11, 2011, 1, pp. 31-33 [abstract]
David C. Korten. UNCED: Unasked Questions. Living Economies Forum, 15 April 1991 [text]
Henry Lesser. Corporate Governance: Some Unasked Questions -- A Personal Commentary. Pepperdine Law Review, 19, 2012, 3 [text]
Danny Bernard Martin. Hidden Assumptions and Unaddressed Questions in Mathematics for All Rhetoric. The Mathematics Educator, 13, 2003, 2, pp. 7-21 [text]
Andrew Maynard. Time to ask the unaskable questions about new technologies? Friends of the Earth Nanotechnology Project, 2012 [text]
John Milbank. Postmodern Critical Augustinianism: a short Summa in forty two responses to unasked questions. Modern Theology, 7, 1991, 3, pp. 225-237 [abstract]
Satish Mishra. Strategic Asia: Ignored Questions of Inequality Lurk In the Shadows of a Growing Economy. Jakarta Globe, 15| October 2009 [text]
Norah Morgan and Juliana Saxton. Asking Better Questions. Pembroke, 2006
Doug Morris. Unpleasant and Unwanted Questions on Iraq. ZNet: a community of people committed to social change, 13 February 2002 [text]
Vali Nasr. Dispensable Nation: American Foreign Policy in Retreat. Doubleday, 2013
Zac Nate. Questioning the Unquestionable: Wake Up Call for Change. Xlibris Corporation, 2012
Trevor Noble. Unexamined Assumptions and Neglected Questions in Social Mobility Research. [text]
Notfemme. How to ask unaskable questions -- the conversations you have to have. 30 May 2012 [text]
Martin Rees. Denial of Catastrophic Risks. Science, 339, 8 March 2013, 6124 [text]
John Renesch. Asking Forbiddden Questions. 2012 [text]
James Reston. Forgotten Questions. The New York Times, 16 September 1981 [text]
Paul Reynolds. Brown: The Unasked Questions. BBC News, 5 March 2010 [text]
Eugene Robinson. Republicans are asking the wrong questions. Washington Post, 24 January 2013 [text]
Paul Rosenberg. Prosperity Economics: answering America's top unasked questions. Al Jazeera, 10 September 2012 [text]
Reihan Salam. Unexamined Assumptions About the Decline in Trust. National Review Online, 2010
Joel Samoff. Unasked Questions Remain Unanswered: Addressing Learning for All. Stanford University 2013 ASA 2013 Annual Meeting Paper [abstract]
W. Alejandro Sanchez. Presidential Foreign Policy Debate, Latin America and 4 more years. VOXXI, 4 November 2012 [text]
Ziauddin Sardar and Merryl Wyn Davies. Why Do People Hate America? Icon Books, 2002.
Malik Imtiaz Sarwar. Answering the Unasked Questions. The Edge, 21 July 2012 [text]
Greg Satell. Before You Innovate, Ask the Right Questions. Harvard Business Review, 11 February 2013 [text]
Elaine Scarry. Thinking in an Emergency. W. W. Norton, 2011
C. R. Schlauch. Neglected Questions at the Interface of Psychology and Religion. Pastoral Psychology, 47, 1999, 3, pp. 209-234 [abstract]
Roger W. Smith. Utopian Goals, Unasked Questions: reflections on a proposed military planning handbook for response to mass atrocities against civilians. Genocide Studies and Prevention, 6, Spring 2011, pp. 77-80 [abstract]
Robert T. Snow. The Impact of Famine Relief: Unasked Questions in Africa. Famine as a Geographical Phenomenon, 1, 1984, pp. 155-181 [text]
Ken J. P. Stuczynski. Unasked Questions Regarding Israel. Consider, Reconsider, 22 September 2011 [text]
Joanna Swann. How to Avoid Giving Unwanted Answers to Unasked Questions: realizing Karl Popper's educational dream. In: Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment, Ashgate, 2006
Nassim Nicholas Taleb. The Black Swan: the impact of the highly improbable. Allen Lane, 2007 [summary]
Susan Thistlethwaite. Settled Issues and Neglected Questions: how is religion to be studied? Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 62, 1994, 4, pp. 1037-1045 [abstract]
Ross Thomas. Forgotten Questions. Chicago Tribune, 24 May 2003 [text]
David H. Topol. Hazardous Waste and Bankruptcy: confronting the unasked questions. Virginia Environmental Law Journal, 13, 185, 1994 [abstract]
Dean Tshenuwani and Simon Farisani. South Africa: Unasked Questions and Unquestionable Answers. Journal of Law and Religion, 5, 1987, 2, pp. 263-273 [abstract]
Craig Unger. Unasked Questions: the 9/11 commission should ask who authorized the evacuation of Saudi nationals in the days following the attacks. Boston Globe, 11 April 2004 [text]
Wolverine. The Unasked Questions About School Shootings (Sandy Hook). Roar of Wolverine, 21 December 2012 [text]
Jessica Wright. Opposition demands answers to ignored questions. The Sydney Morning Herald, Date 29 December 2011 [text]
This work is licenced under a creative commons licence.