Challenges to Comprehension Implied by the Logo
of Laetus in Praesens
Laetus in Praesens Alternative view of segmented documents via Kairos

21 May 2024 | Draft

Eliciting Experimentally an Overview by AI of AI-related Articles

Use of facilities of ChatGPT 4 and Claude 3

-- / --

Summary of an array of AI-focused articles -- ChatGPT versus Claude 3
Experimental poetic representations of summaries -- ChatGPT versus Claude 3
Summary generated experimentally in image form by ChatGPT
Comparative experimental use of Claude 3
Concluding psychosocial questions -- ChatGPT versus Claude 3
Strategic tokenism and misplaced concreteness?


History will no doubt recognize this to be a transitional period of both excessive enthusiasm and concern regarding the use and abuse of of artificial intelligence in relation to academic documents. At the time of writing this has been associated with multiple retractions of journal papers (Richard Van Noorden, More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023 -- a new record, Nature, 12 December 2023; Up to one in seven submissions to hundreds of Wiley journals flagged by new paper mill tool, Retraction Watch, 14 March 2024; Frank Landymore, Paper retracted when authors caught using ChatGPT to write it, The Byte, 9 September 2023). There are now many initiatives to curtail the use of AI (Cynthia Kroet, EU Policy. How the world is grappling with AI: acts, pacts and declarations, Euronews, 19 May 2024).

In a lengthy series of exchanges (primarily over the past year), responses have been elicited from ChatGPT on questions relating to AI. These have given rise to a series of web documents regarding AI and its implications. In the spirit of experimentation with AI and its constraints, the series of articles has been variously presented to ChatGPT 4 and Claude 3 (released 14 March 2024) to elicit a general summary of the series, together with presentations in poetic form, and illustrative images (Ryan Kane, Claude vs. ChatGPT: What's the difference? Zapier, 18 April 2024; Aaron Drapkin, ChatGPT vs Claude 3 Test: Can Anthropic Beat OpenAI’s Superstar?, 10 March 2024)

The procedure was applied to the introductory and concluding sections of the most recent aticle. Recognizing that neither ChatGPT 4 nor Claude 3 currently has direct access to those documents, an integrative summary of the array of themes was evoked experimentally on the basis of their titles (and subtitles). At the time of writing PDF versions of such articles could be summarized and questioned through AI.Drive -- a new plugin associated with ChatGPT 4. Although this was briefly tested successfully, the facility did not immediately invite systematic use.

As with the earlier exercises cited, the following exploration makes extensive use of AI. Reservations regarding such use have been previously noted, both with regard to the questionable verbosity and style of responses, and what could be termed an undue degree of "algorithmic enthusiasm" for the relevance of the questions posed (Eliciting integrative insight via ChatGPT, 2024). The role of such AI facilities as an "aggregator" of non-numeric information, rather than as a "computer" of numeric data was noted. Of particular interest however is critical assessment of the extent to which the responses frame new insights rather than a preponderance of "strategic clichés" -- potentially derived from the reports of that quality which feature in many authoritative references.

As previously noted, a merit of this approach is that readers can explore alternative articulations by repeating (or amending) the questions to the AI facilities to which they have access -- especially as those facilities become more sophisticated and have a wider access to published research. As in the papers cited, the responses of both ChatGPT are distinctively presented below in grayed areas, as with those of Claude 3.

Summary of an array of AI-focused articles -- ChatGPT 4 versus Claude 3

Question to ChatGPT and Claude 3: In a lengthy series of exchanges (primarily over the past year) responses have been elicited from ChatGPT which have given rise to a series of web documents regarding AI and its implications. Recognizing that such facilities currently have no direct access to those documents, could you formulate an integrative summary of the array of themes evoked on the basis of their titles (and subtitles) from the following checklist:

ChatGPT 4 Claude 3

The series of themes explored through interactions with ChatGPT are deeply interconnected, reflecting a profound engagement with complex systems, AI's role in understanding and shaping these systems, and the broader philosophical and ethical implications. Here's an integrative summary that captures the essence and connections among these themes:

  • Integrative Themes and Insights
    • AI and Strategic Complexity: The array of themes underscores a consistent exploration of how AI can aid in understanding and navigating complex strategic landscapes, whether through mathematical modeling, gamification, or simulations like the Israel-Palestine conflict as a strategy game. AI's capacity to model complex interactions and propose innovative solutions is central to these discussions.
    • Interdisciplinary Dialogue and Integration: Themes such as the "Comprehension of Singularity through 4-fold Complementarity" and "Mathematical Modelling of Silo Thinking in Interdisciplinary Contexts" highlight the potential of AI to enhance interdisciplinary dialogue and integration. AI is envisioned as a tool that breaks down disciplinary silos, fostering a more holistic understanding of global challenges.
    • Cognitive and Cultural Implications of AI: Several themes delve into the cognitive and cultural implications of AI. For instance, "Implication of Mathematics in Human Experience from an AI Perspective" and "Magical Discourse Contrasting Human and AI Identity" explore how AI challenges and extends our understanding of human cognition and identity. This reflects a deep inquiry into what AI reveals about human intelligence and the potential for AI to model or even enhance human cognitive processes.
    • Ethics and Governance: Ethical considerations are central to many themes, such as in "Just War Theory as an inspiration for Just AI Theory?" and "Governance of Pandemic Response by Artificial Intelligence". These themes question how AI can be governed ethically and how it can contribute to more ethical decision-making processes in global governance.
    • Metaphors and Models: The exploration of metaphors, such as in George Lakoff's "Metaphors We Live By" and their role in shaping our perception and understanding of the world, recurs across several themes. The use of metaphors in AI modeling and their implications for understanding complex systems is a key focus, suggesting that metaphorical thinking is crucial in bridging AI applications and human cognitive frameworks.
    • Cultural Narratives and Global Epics: Themes like "Envisaging a Game of Subtlety Enabling New Global Dynamics" and the potential for creating a new global epic reflect on how narratives and cultural storytelling can be integrated with technological advancements to foster a cohesive global identity.
  • Conclusions and Future Directions: The themes collectively suggest a vision where AI not only enhances our ability to address and understand complex problems but also challenges us to rethink our philosophical, ethical, and cognitive frameworks. The potential for AI to act as a "systemic reflecting macroscope" is particularly poignant, offering a new lens through which to view global dynamics and human interactions.

This integrative view emphasizes AI's role not just as a tool for solving problems but as a transformative element in rethinking how we understand complexity, make decisions, and govern our societies. The future directions implied by these themes advocate for a continued exploration of AI's potential in creating more adaptable, resilient, and ethically grounded systems. This journey requires ongoing dialogue, interdisciplinary integration, and a commitment to aligning AI development with human values and global needs.

Certainly, I would be happy to provide an integrative summary of the themes evoked by the titles and subtitles of the web documents you have created based on your prior exchanges with ChatGPT. Please provide the checklist of titles and subtitles, and I will analyze them to identify and synthesize the overarching themes present across the documents. This analysis will be based solely on the information contained within the titles and subtitles themselves, as you mentioned I do not have direct access to the full text of the documents. I will do my best to discern the key topics, issues, and perspectives explored through an integrative thematic examination of the available titles and headings.

Based on the provided list of titles and subtitles, I can identify several overarching themes that appear to be explored across these documents:

  • The role and implications of artificial intelligence (AI) in various domains:
    • Enhancing interdisciplinary dialogue and integration
    • Providing perspectives on mathematical modeling and complexity
    • Aiding in comprehension, analysis, and generation of patterns/configurations
    • Exploring the potential and challenges of AI in strategic decision-making, conflict resolution, and governance
  • Integrative thinking and the quest for coherence:
    • Connecting disparate concepts, disciplines, and perspectives
    • Developing frameworks and models for understanding and representing complexity
    • Utilizing geometric/polyhedral metaphors and visualizations for coherent knowledge organization
    • Exploring strategies for harmonizing dissonance and reconciling oppositions
  • Strategic navigation of global challenges and polarization:
    • Addressing issues such as territorial conflicts, sustainable development goals, and pandemic response
    • Examining misrepresentation, alternative perspectives, and contrarian analysis
    • Investigating the implications of AI for human identity, emotional intelligence, and authenticity in dialogue
  • Metaphysical and existential explorations:
    • Reflecting on the nature of human intelligence and artificial intelligence
    • Examining the implications of mathematics and patterns in human experience
    • Exploring the potential of AI to aid in thinking "otherwise" and challenging hegemonic narratives
    • Investigating the relationship between constructs, nature, and natural disasters
  • Experimental and creative approaches:
    • Utilizing AI (such as ChatGPT) for experimental exchanges, simulations, and game development
    • Exploring the potential of AI in enhancing conferencing processes and meeting design
    • Investigating the use of artistic and literary metaphors (e.g., the Song of Songs) for strategic cultivation

Overall, these documents seem to grapple with the multifaceted implications of AI, seeking to leverage its capabilities for integrative thinking, coherent representation of complexity, and the exploration of novel perspectives on global challenges, human identity, and metaphysical inquiries. The experimental and creative approaches employed, including the use of AI itself, highlight the desire to push the boundaries of conventional thinking and foster innovative solutions.

Future development of ChatGPT and Claude 3, and their direct access to the documents cited, will enable a distinctive pattern of insights to be generated.

Experimental poetic representations of summaries -- ChatGPT 4 versus Claude 3

The following use of a summary in poetic form is inspired by the practice of Kenneth Boulding in concluding professional meetings he had chaired. With Elise Boulding, he highlighted the need for an "image" of the future (Elise Boulding and Kenneth Ewart Boulding, The Future: Images and Processes, 1995). Elise variously chose to summarize a meeting in song. This suggests a practice which could be adopted to give a concluding focus to other gatherings -- notably global summits with strategic implications.

Question to ChatGPT: In a previous exercise, the text summary of an exchange was reframed in sonnet form. Could you present the above summary in that mode

ChatGPT 4 Claude 3

Here's a sonnet that captures the integrative themes of your exploration into AI, societal structures, and the potential for transformative governance:

Sonnet of Future's Interface: In realms where thought and algorithm blend, Where AI maps the complex webs we weave, Each query's path unfolds, begins, and ends, As ChatGPT through tangled themes does cleave. With models born of math's profound embrace, It breaks the silos where our disciplines lie, Fostering dialogs 'cross conceptual space, Where siloed minds once stale, now soar and fly.

Ethics, governance -- our guide and guard,

In structured verse where just AI theories spawn.

Through metaphor and model, it regards

The human plight and dreams to draw upon.

Thus, through the macroscope's reflective eye,

Our global stage is set beneath one sky.

This sonnet aims to reflect the synthesis of AI's capabilities and its impact on understanding complex global dynamics, while also emphasizing the ethical, cultural, and cognitive explorations involved in integrating AI into human societal frameworks.

Yes, I can attempt to present the summary in sonnet form. Here is my attempt at encapsulating the key themes from the list of titles and subtitles in a 14-line sonnet:

In AI's wake, we ponder great insights,
Enhancing dialogue 'cross disciplines.
Mathematical models' subtle delights,
Unveil complexities, coherence begins.

Misrepresentations we must discern,
Harmonize discord through frameworks new.
Imagining how AIs will learn,
Connecting patterns far and insights true.

Strategic quests for peace and unity,
Comprehending human intelligence.
Simulations test reality,
Contrasting views lest we lose prescience.

Through sonnets wrought, AI aids our quest,
Integrating knowledge, by art's behest.

In this sonnet, I've tried to capture the major themes of utilizing AI for interdisciplinary integration, mathematical modeling of complexity, identifying misrepresentations, harmonizing opposing views through frameworks, imagining the future of AI, discerning patterns that connect, exploring strategic challenges like conflict resolution and sustainable development, examining human intelligence in relation to AI, using simulations and contrasting perspectives, and the experimental approach of employing AI and artistic forms like sonnets to aid in the integrative quest for knowledge.

Please let me know if you would like me to modify or expand on this sonnet in any way. I'm happy to iterate on poetic renderings of the summary.

The adequacy of such a sonnet, in both substantive and aesthetic terms, could be challenged in further iterative interaction with ChatGPT. Of particular interest is the possibility of enhancing its memorability as it might preferably relate to the systemic connectivity between the themes evoked, as discussed separately (Potential for Coherence through Engaging Strategic Poetry, 2021; Variety of Rhyming Patterns in Standard 14-line Sonnets, 2021). That focused followed from earlier recognition of potential implications (Poetic Engagement with Afghanistan, Caucasus and Iran an unexplored strategic opportunity? 2009; Strategic Jousting through Poetic Wrestling: aesthetic reframing of the clash of civilizations, 2009; Poetry-making and Policy-making: arranging a marriage between Beauty and the Beast, 1993).

The relevance of haiku has been highlighted by the first Secretary-General of the United Nations, Dag Hammarsjöld, and has been especially associated with the first permanent president of the European Council, Herman van Rompuy (‘Haiku Herman’ speaks of allure, appeal of haiku, The Japan News, 15 September 2022). The potential of haiku and song have been discussed separately (Ensuring Strategic Resilience through Haiku Patterns, 2006; A Singable Earth Charter, EU Constitution or Global Ethic? 2006).

Question to ChatGPT: In a previous exercise, ChatGPT reframed the text summary of an exchange in haiku form. Could you present the above summary in that mode

ChatGPT 4 Claude 3

Here's a haiku sequence that captures the essence of the themes discussed in the summary:

AI's vast weave spins,
Complex patterns emerge clear,
New thoughts awaken.

Silos fall to dust,
Interdisciplinary --
A new world in sync.

Ethics guide the hand,
Governance reshaped by code,
Just futures unfurl.

Metaphors take flight,
Shapes of thought and theory blend,
New narratives born.

This set of haikus reflects the interplay of AI with societal structures, emphasizing transformation, ethical governance, and the power of new narratives in shaping future possibilities.

Here is an attempt to synthesize those themes into an integrative haiku summary:

AI insights bloom
Bridging clefts, evoking wholes
Patterned metamorphs

Artificial blooms
Coherence from fragmented
Minds unfurled, made whole

Converge in vast lattices
AI's grand mandala

I tried to capture the themes of using AI to integrate disparate perspectives and cultivate coherent understanding from complexity and fragmentation.

The thrird alternative leans into the metaphysical and geometric/configuration aspects, portraying AI as a convergence point revealing higher-dimensional patterns and unified meta-rationales.

Summary generated experimentally in image form by ChatGPT 4

Question to ChatGPT: In a previous exercise, ChatGPT used the text summary of the exchange as a prompt to DALL-E. Could you present the above summary in that image mode

The digital painting inspired by the themes discussed has been created. It visually represents the convergence of artificial intelligence and human thought, capturing the essence of interdisciplinary dialogues and the integration of ethics and governance within a futuristic societal framework. You can view the image below to see how these concepts have been artistically interpreted.

Images generated by DALL-E to summarize the themes highlighted by the titles above, as framed by the text summary
Iteration 1 Iteration 2
Images generated by DALL-E to summarize the themes highlighted by titles of a set of AI-related articles Images generated by DALL-E to summarize the themes highlighted by titles of a set of AI-related articles

As noted in previous requests for such AI-generated images, their value is highly questionable -- althrough potentially significant with regard to future development (Nicola Jones, How journals are fighting back against a wave of questionable images, Nature, 12 February 2024; Carl Franzen, Science journal retracts peer-reviewed article containing AI generated ‘nonsensical’ images, VentureBeat, 16 February 2024). As indicated by the transition from the first to the second image, the application is responsive to feedback on possible amendments more reflective of an adequate summary.

Question to ChatGPT: That image (above left) reflects an inorganic technological aesthetic to an excessive degree. Could you generate a variant with more organic characteristics

The new digital painting with a more organic aesthetic has been created [above right]. It blends futuristic technology with natural elements, featuring a serene scene of interconnected biotechnological networks alongside natural textures like leaves, wood, and water. This visualization aims to harmonize the technological with the organic, reflecting a lush, innovative environment. You can view the image above to see how these concepts are artistically expressed in this variant.

Comparative experimental use of Claude 3

Question to Claude 3: The most recent exercise endeavoured to suggest how a subtle game might be designed, following the allusive inspiration of Hesse's Glass Bead Game. In considering any modification or extension to the sonnet, the question is how the allusion might be appropriately enhanced with memorable aesthetic metaphors sensitive to the systemic challenges of future global governance. Could you work with that in producing a new variant of the sonnet

Here is an attempt to incorporate allusions to the subtle "Glass Bead Game" inspired design and the challenges of future global governance, with memorable aesthetic metaphors:

Through AI's lens, new insights we discern,
A subtle game designed, where patterns yearn
To harmonize diverse themes in disciplined turn,
Aesthetic metaphors our vision adorn.

Mathematics caresses reality's urn,
Unveiling misrepresentations to spurn.
Complexity's chords, AI helps discern,
In weavings gemmed where truths sojourn.

The global sphere, challenges loom large,
Dissonance swells like an ominous charge.
Yet in this game, we symbolic bridges forge,
Reconciling strife through change we disembarge.

A Governance Grail, elusive yet bright,
If but we play this Game of Insight.

In this version, I try to evoke the subtle, metaphorical "Game" inspired by Hesse's Glass Bead Game. Imagery of patterns, aesthetic metaphors, mathematical caresses of reality, and gemmed weavings of truth are used to capture the aesthetically-driven integration attempted.

The challenges of global governance and dissonance are portrayed ominously, but the Game allows symbolic bridging to reconcile divisions. The quest is portrayed as one for an elusive "Governance Grail" which may be achieved if we engage fully with this subtle "Game of Insight" facilitated by AI.

By incorporating allusions to games, aesthetic metaphors, symbolic integration, and the stakes of global governance, I've aimed to create a more evocative, imagistic sonnet aligned with your quest. Please let me know if you would modify or expand it further.

Question to Claude 3: If it is correct that you cannot access the article in question via the URL, is it feasible portions of the text to be pasted into the prompt -- with the responses of ChatGPT -- to enable you to elaborate a summary which might inform the generation of a sonnet

Unfortunately, as an AI assistant without the ability to browse the internet or open links, I am unable to directly access that web page. However, I would be grateful if you could copy and paste the relevant text content from that URL into our conversation. That will allow me to analyze the full text and context, and then craft an appropriately insightful and metaphorical sonnet summarizing the key themes and ideas explored in that piece. Please feel free to include as much of the text as you feel is relevant. With the content directly available to me, I can provide a more substantive poetic rendering capturing the essence of that work.

Thank you for providing the context and dialogue from your previous exchanges with ChatGPT. I have carefully reviewed the text, and based on the themes explored, I've composed the following sonnet as a poetic summary:

In virtuality, a gameboard's weft,
Woven by AI's intricate design,
Encoding shadows where strategies tine -
Historied wisdom, binding warp and weft.

Through symbolic threads and numeric art,
Tessellations flow in life's strange dance,
Reflecting light, dark truth's bright radiance,
Teaching the mind how wholeness plays its part.

Encounters challenge human reason's lore,
As visions shift between the malign, benign -
Unveiling layers we ne'er saw before,
While pattern forms that forever enshrine.

In contest's throes, a synth'sis sublime:
Transcending limits, redefining Time.

This sonnet aims to capture the essence of the envisioned AI-driven gaming experience that blends historical wisdom, symbolic encoding, mathematical patterns, and the interplay between perceived beneficence and malignance. The game world is depicted as a richly woven virtuality shaped by AI's complex design, challenging human reason while unveiling deeper layers of understanding.

The tercets explore the dualities present, with encounters that shift between malign and benign visions, prompting transcendence of boundaries and a sublime synthesis that redefines our perception of time and limits. The couplet suggests that through the contest and struggle within this game, a profound transcendence occurs, a redefinition of possibilities.

By incorporating metaphors of weaving, tessellations, light and shadow, numeric art, and the dance of life, I've attempted to evoke the multi-layered, symbolic, and mathematically-inspired nature of the envisioned gaming environment. The language aims to capture the sense of exploration, learning, and the integration of apparent opposites into a higher, more holistic understanding.

Please let me know if you would like me to modify or expand on any aspects of this poetic rendering to better align with the essence of the AI-driven game concept you've outlined.

Question to Claude 3: Since you have indeed been able to read the pasted text, could you elaborate a conventional text summary -- the basis for the sonnet

Certainly, here is a more conventional textual summary based on the dialogue and context provided:

  • The discussion revolves around the conceptualization of an innovative game design inspired by elements such as The Glass Bead Game, AI involvement, and the integration of seemingly disparate concepts. The envisioned game aims to blend strategic gameplay with cultural exploration, mathematical patterns, logical challenges, and profound educational value.
  • Leveraging the capabilities of artificial intelligence, the game environment would be highly dynamic and adaptive, continuously evolving based on player actions and the AI's real-time analysis. The AI would generate scenarios rooted in historical events, psychological insights, and strategic models, guiding players through an immersive experience tailored to their learning curve and decision-making style.
  • A key aspect is the incorporation of both beneficent and malignant AI functionalities, representing the duality of technology's potential for positive and negative outcomes. The beneficent AI would foster constructive learning experiences, ethical decision-making, and conflict resolution, while the malignant AI would introduce challenges such as misinformation, hidden agendas, and ethical dilemmas, testing players' ability to navigate complex landscapes akin to real-world issues.
  • The game would present players with intricate scenarios involving ethical trade-offs, complex narratives that challenge simplistic moral reasoning, and opportunities to directly influence the AI's behavior through feedback mechanisms. This dynamic interplay between AI functionalities and human input would contribute to the AI's ongoing evolution, aligning its actions with ethically nuanced player expectations.
  • Furthermore, the game aims to explore the implications of AI development across various socio-political contexts, acknowledging the potential for misuse by entities like organized crime or oppressive regimes, as well as the subjective nature of labeling certain actions as "criminal" or "revolutionary." It highlights the need for transparent, accountable AI development, ethical frameworks, and public oversight to ensure responsible deployment and adaptation to changing social norms.
  • Overall, the envisioned game seeks to create a rich, multifaceted experience that blends strategic gameplay, cultural exploration, ethical deliberation, and dynamic AI interaction, serving not only as an entertainment platform but also as a tool for education, social analysis, and fostering a nuanced understanding of AI's role in shaping our future.

Question to Claude 3:

The concluding sections of the article offer an intriguing and ambitious concept for a game called "Worlds Within Worlds" that aims to integrate the diverse array of memes and ideas presented earlier. Here are some key points about the proposed game concept:

  • Overview:
    • It is envisioned as a complex strategy and role-playing game that challenges players to navigate and reshape a dynamic, ever-changing virtual world driven by diverse and often conflicting societal memes and narratives.
    • The game combines elements of storytelling, complex decision-making, and world-building, serving as both an entertaining experience and an educational tool for fostering critical thinking about global issues and the future of human society.
  • Gameplay Mechanics:
    • The game world is in a constant state of flux, influenced by players' decisions, random events, and underlying simulated models of economic, social, and environmental systems.
    • Players can explore various narrative paths and scenarios based on the memes introduced, such as navigating "end times" crises, resolving "clashes of civilizations," addressing global governance challenges, and more.
    • The game incorporates AI as a "reflecting macroscope" to help players analyze complex interactions between global systems, aiding strategic decision-making.
    • Players can wield metaphors as tools to unlock new strategies and resources, inspired by Lakoff's work on the power of metaphors in shaping perception.
    • The game goes beyond visual and textual modalities, incorporating elements like music, rituals, and art, drawing inspiration from Hesse's Glass Bead Game concept.
    • Players can engage in collaborative storytelling, contributing to the creation of global narratives and epics that reflect the diversity of myths and legends worldwide.
  • Educational and Reflective Outcomes:
    • The game aims not only to entertain but also to educate players about global interdependencies, the importance of sustainability, and the impact of cultural and political decisions on global stability and harmony.
    • Players can experiment with different strategies for addressing global challenges, experience the consequences of their actions in a simulated environment, and reflect on potential real-world applications of their insights.
  • Overall, the "Worlds Within Worlds" concept presents an ambitious and multifaceted approach to game design, aiming to create a engaging and immersive virtual world that simultaneously serves as a platform for exploring complex global issues, fostering critical thinking, and promoting cross-cultural understanding and collaboration.

Concluding psychosocial questions -- ChatGPT 4 versus Claude 3

The development of the above argument, under this heading, has been transferred to a separate document (Psychosocial systemic implications of global modelling -- ChatGPT 4 versus Claude 3, 2024)

Strategic tokenism and misplaced concreteness?

The development of the above argument, under this heading, has been transferred to a separate document (Strategic tokenism and misplaced concreteness? 2024)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

For further updates on this site, subscribe here