15th May 2007 | Draft

Three-stage Emergence of a Union of Imaginable Associations

Reclaiming the heritage of misappropriated collective endeavour

- / -


Annex 1 of Emergence of a Union of Imaginable Associations: engendered by a Union of Intelligible Associations from a Union of International Associations


Introduction (reproduced from main paper)
Context
Evolution of knowledge management
Nature of an emergent Union of Imaginable Associations? Associations | Imaginative | Union
Historical origins: Stage 0?
Three-stage emergence? (Table 1) (Annex 1)

Progressive dematerialization and virtualization of vehicle identity (Table 2)
Associated disintegrative processes (Table 3)
Reclaiming the heritage of misappropriated collective endeavour (Table 4)
Comprehending the transformative challenge of "stages" and their relationship
Metaphors of stage separation and emergence
Distinguishing stages in the light of potential (mis)understanding (Table 5)
Conclusion (Table 6)

Detailed description of stages (exemplifying challenges in other organizations) (Annex 2)

   Stage 1: Union of International Associations (UIA1): Contextual challenges | Internal challenges
   Stage 2: Union of Intelligible Associations (UIA2): Contextual challenges | Internal challenges
   Stage 3: Union of Imaginable Associations (UIA3): Contextual challenges | Internal challenges
   Comprehension of stage separation (decoupling / detachment) in transformation processes

Psychosocial energy from polarization within a cyclic pattern of enantiodromia (Annex 3)

Implications of the cybernetics of cybernetics
Psychosocial energy through a metaphorical technology
Schematic Denkmodel (Table 1)
Epistemological domains
Global vs Local (in Table 1) | Positive vs Negative (in Table 1) | Relationships (within Table 1)
Beyond the plane of Möbius: form and medium in terms of the calculus of indications
Visualization: quadrant systems / Möbius strips / Klein bottles
"Sphering the Circle" (from 2D to 3D): a Klein-bottle relationship "belt drive"?
Enantiodromia: cycling through the "cognitive twist"
Psychosocial work cycle / heat engine
Psychosocial power and its generation

Emergent higher-order symbol as a cognitive/existential "keystone"
Indicative examples of 2nd and 3rd order environments
Conclusion
References


Introduction (reproduced from main paper)

This "story" explores the underlying inspiration of the century-old Union of International Associations (UIA) in its currently challenged effort to continue to function as a clearinghouse for information on the diversity of bodies responding to social challenges of every conceivable variety -- including major institutional systems such as the United Nations and regional bodies such as the European Commission.

The process of creation of the Union of International Associations from 1907 can be understood as an audaciously imaginative act -- at the origins of international society as it is now known and prior to any form of international legal framework through which the existence of any such body could be recognized. Although it may subsequently be said to have acted -- despite the severe disruption of two world wars -- in the name of international bodies present at its creation, it cannot be said to have been representative of them in any conventional democratic sense. This is especially the case following its reconstition in 1951 as an institute based on individual membership. To a significant degree it has remained an act of the collective imagination of those directly involved who have sustained a highly productive pattern of self-funded activity over past decades. This has also, to a certain degree, sustained the illusion of the existence of a "Union of International Associations" as originally intended -- an illusion that has contributed to the success of the initiative.

Efforts to reform and transform the UIA ("UIA1") are here framed as having effectively engendered a distinct "transitional" vehicle, usefully named as the Union of Intelligible Associations ("UIA2"). This has emphasized a strategic knowledge management function beyond the conventional information gathering and classifying preoccupations of UIA1. The fundamental challenge to UIA2, as presented here, usefully models similar inadequacies in many institutions variously seeking to enhance collective intelligence in response to information overload in the face of social and strategic complexity.

Confronted by its own inadequacies, UIA2 is however understood here as having itself created a context for the emergence of a Union of Imaginable Associations ("UIA3"). This could be understood as more relevant to the integrative possibilities and culture of the times -- and to the strategic flexibility and forms of cognitive engagement for which they call. These three different "stages" are first described before subsequently exploring the necessarily unusual, counter-intuitive challenges to how they may be fruitfully understood as interrelated -- if UIA3 is to be of any significance.

A vital thread implicit in this story lies in the various understandings of the "existence" of collective "international" bodies, the ownership of their (intellectual) "property" in an increasingly open information society, and the claims that may "legitimately" be made on both by those who actively sustain them over decades. Such considerations are especially relevant in the transition over a century through the colonial era to one in which post-colonialist, participative values are upheld. The emergence of a Union of Imaginable Associations is therefore presented (in this Annex) as a progressive reclaiming of a heritage of misappropriated collective endeavour.

Fundamentally, however, this exploration is not so much about a "UIA" but rather about how comprehension is organized integratively in response to collective challenges in the world -- and what can be learnt to that end from the challenges and evolution of a "UIA". In this sense the emergence of a Union of Imaginable Associations offers a template for a radical reconfiguration of how these opportunities may be dynamically encountered -- whether for the individual or for any collective initiative.

The intent here is not to explore any 3-fold ontology (or theology) of organizational "body", "soul" and "spirit" -- as distinguished in some management literature. Rather the focus here is on the nature of distinct vehicles for collective intent -- and of how a vehicle of one form may effectively be necessary in order to engender another of subtler form and of greater integrity and efficacy, better adapted to the challenges of the 21st century. Nor is the intent thereby to frame a potentially discriminatory scale of excellence through privileging a particular form. As is shown (in Annex 3), distinct stages may well be more fruitfully understood as interrelated as a cycle through which psychosocial engergy is generated -- such that the seemingly subtlest necessarily engages in the process of engendering the most concrete. Each stage may then be understood as a transitional vehicle through which insight and action are expressed in response to challenges and opportunity.

The exploration raises the question whether the stages of evolution of "UIA" over a century reflect the evolution of collective emphasis in the shift:

  • from: information space as fundamental to an information society (assumed to be adequate to knowledge needs for strategy making)?
  • through: knowledge space as fundamental to a knowledge society (assumed to be adequate to strategic insight)?
  • to: an "imagination space" fundamental to an "imagination society" (assumed to be adequate for imaginative strategic response) ?
In this context, it is therefore appropriate to celebrate the centennial of the imaginative act, through which the Union of International Associatioins was created, by another imaginative initiative appropriate to the 21st century and consistent with the original inspiration -- namely the instigation of a Union of Imaginable Associations.

Three-stage emergence?

The table below endeavours to portray the relationship between the various stages. It presents each subsequent phase as being conceived and effectively initiated during the course of the previous stage that thus provides a supportive framework within which it was configured. Typically there is a degree of rupture on the actual emergence of the new stage. It is in this sense that an initial Stage 0 (UIA0) is presented in the table, since until 1948 UIA1 was effectively embedded within the Mundaneum, possibly to be understood metaphorically as a "womb". The files of UIA1 were literally then extracted from the archives of the Mundaneum (to the latter's considerable dismay) in what might, in that metaphor, be termed a caesarean birth. As discussed below, it is a matter of reflection as to whether the emergent Stage 3 form, painfully "birthed" from Stage 2, will represent the mature form of a "UIA" that will in its turn "plant an egg", be the "womb" for such an "egg", or be an "egg" itself.

In Table 1, the darkness of the cell colour is an indication of the degree of programme emphasis in terms of allocation of resources. The lightest grey is an indication of a sustained interest requiring relative little allocation of resources (notably in the case of online databases that may only be occasionally updated).

Table 1: Emergent stages in relation to programme emphases over time
. Stages "Stage 0" Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3/0
"UIA" "UIA0" UIA1 UIA2 UIA3
Year 1907> 1920> 1948> 1970>
1995> 2005>
2007>
Inception / ("Deception") Stage 1 . (Stage 0) Stage 2 (Stage 1) Stage 3 (Stage 2)
UIA1 Organizations             ?
Meetings             ?
Bibliography             ?
Biography             ?
Logotypes             ?
UIA2 Problems / Issues             ?
Strategies             ?
Human dev. / Values             ?
Integrative concepts             ?
Metaphors / Patterns             ?
Questions             ?
UIA1 Classification             ?
Statistics / Research             ?
Journal             ?
Facilitation             ?
UIA2 Systems development             ?
Visualization / Mapping             ?
UIA1 Representation             ?
IGO relations             ?
Coordination / Normative             ?
Legal             ?

Elaborating the time points in the table (further discussed in Annex 2: Detailed description of stages (exemplifying challenges in other organizations):

Stage 0: Essentially under the leadership and guidance of Paul Otlet and Henri La Fontaine
  • 1907: Creation of the Central Office of International Associations, and the subsequent establishment in 1910 of the Union of International Associations as a federation (collective membership), within the operational context of the Mundaneum

  • 1920: Reactivation in association with the Mundaneum following the chaos of World War I; transfer of UIA responsibility for international associations profiling to the League of Nations; effective cessation of activity in 1934 following withdrawal of Belgian government support
Stage 1 [chronology]:
  • 1948: Post-war resumption of activity, essentially under the leadership and guidance of Georges Patrick Speeckaert (with the benefit of a legacy of Henri La Fontaine) leading to the reconstitution of the UIA in 1951 as a separate legal and physical research institute (individual membership), following formal recognition by UN-ECOSOC of responsibility of UIA for international organization profiling. Editorial continuity was ensured by Eyvind Tew and Genevieve Devillé

  • 1970: Inception of the computerization of databases and the transition to Robert Fenaux as Secretary-General (Visualization of the International Organization Network: the UIA as an international data bank, 1970; Knowledge-Representation in a Computer-Supported Environment, 1977). Significantly the journal name was changed from International Associations to Transnational Associations in 1977. Editorial continuity was ensured by Eyvind Tew, Genevieve Devillé, Romuald Covalescu, Jacqueline Nebel, and Anthony Judge.
    • Implicit inception of a "Union of Intelligible Associations" (UIA2) as a strategic initiative from 1972 through extension of database content in the development of the Encyclopedia of World Problems and Human Potential (in collaboration with Mankind 2000) and its subsequent editions -- interrelating other "non-organizational" preoccupations that were the key to the online relational database environment of Stage 2.
    • Completion of in-house computerization in 1985 (with installation of an early in-house network and implementation of a new classification methodology) as a necessary, if disruptive transition, in order to improve operations under severe budgetary constraints. Most hardcopy archives on organizations from 1907 were donated to the Belgian Archives in 1985.
    • Collaboration with the United Nations University through the programme on Goals, Processes and Indicators of Development (1978-1986)
    • Consideration of appropriateness of renaming the "Union of International Associations", or reinterpreting the implications of its name in the light of its activities (Significance in a Name: Union of International Associations) notably in terms of the Varieties of Union of International Associations based on the various meanings that can be usefully associated with the three terms ("union", "international" and "associations")
Stage 2:
  • 1995: Progressive reorientation to the web and the dissemination of hyperlinked database information. The Secretaries-General of this period were Jacques Raeymaeckers, Andre Onkelinx, followed by Anthony Judge in an ad interim capacity (in response to an immediate financial crisis in 2004). Editorial continuity was ensured by Romuald Covalescu, Jacqueline Nebel, Anthony Judge and Nadia McLaren. Information systems development was notably carried out by Tomáš Fülöpp and Anthony Judge.

  • 2005-2006: Statutory authorities were faced in June 2004 with a major financial crisis which resulted in the appointment of Anthony Judge as Secretary-General ad interim who averted the short-term challenge. The critical accumulation of governance challenges and policy disagreements in relation to longer-term financial pressures and ethical issues (including disregard of obligations to staff as well as repudiation of both long-term soft loans and related copyright arrangements with Mankind 2000 at the origin of Stage 2) resulted in the resignation in January 2005 of Anthony Judge (from his role as Secretary-General ad interim). Other consequences included:
    • 2005:
    • 2006:
      • Continuing collaboration with DFKI to enable the international multimedia library project of dropping knowledge (Enabling a Living Library), effectively completing and superceding the early ambitions at the origin of UIA1 within the Mundaneum.
      • Generation of a large database of questions (Generating a Million Questions from UIA Databases: Problems, Strategies, Values; Preliminary NetMap Studies of Databases on Questions, World Problems, Global Strategies, and Values), effectively achieving a different form of closure for UIA2.
      • Continuing difficulty to formulate a viable business plan (despite foreseeable financial crisis in 2007), breakdown in maintenance functions, marginalization of (non-Belgian) senior management and collaborators, and effective abdication of elected administrators (breaking a statutory commitment of accountability to an essentially indifferent membership).
      • In what effectively constituted a "takeunder" rather than a "takeover", the remaining (Belgian, Dutch-speaking, female) staff were instead encouraged (through a process typical of sects rather than of managing a self-financing enterprise), to:
        • act as a non-statutory, self-managing policy-making body, functioning as a surrogate Bureau
        • creatively set aside all constraints and cautions (including documented learnings from the past) as characteristic of negative thinking
        • develop their own initiatives (including rebranding "UIA" with a new logo, without membership consultation)
        • reallocate editorial staff to marketing, effectively breaking a long-term content quality commitment to users
        • promote commercial address list marketing, effectively framing NGOs as targets:
          • breaking an implicit contract with spam-threatened international associations (freely supplying information)
          • undermining a long-nurtured reputation as an independent nonprofit clearinghouse
        • revert to a Stage 1 strategy (seeking to reactivate earlier initiatives, such as training programmes for NGOs and an "International University") --- despite much-challenged governance and financial issues (and without seeking any insight into why earlier initiatives had failed).
      • Effective reversion to its early status as a Belgian information initiative maintaining an international facade
      • Culmination of a century of effort, to classify international organizations and their documentation, with an unprecedented focus on "classifying" aspects of its own activities through the imposition of lifelong confidentiality agreements on its own staff -- a symbolically appropriate form of closure for UIA1 and UIA2 (following its explicit commitment to The Open Society of the Future: Report of a seminar to reflect on the network of international associations, 1973)
Stage3:

Progressive dematerialization and virtualization of vehicle identity

Table 2: Stages in "dematerialization" of preoccupations according to refinement of
understandings of "UIA" functions (in response to learnings from misplaced concreteness)
. "Stage 0" Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3/0
. "UIA0" UIA1 UIA2 UIA3
"Associations" civil society representative civil society bodies (+intergovernmental organizations) active virtual and conceptual entities focusing and enabling collective action (coherent? harmless?) meaningful, relevant, empowering associations
"International"
"Intelligible"
"Imaginative"
international worldwide international (across geopolitical boundaries) cross-disciplinary (intelligible) relationships (across conceptual boundaries) cross-boundary (potential, suggestive, implicative, inspiring)
"Union" universal
organization
classification of organizations (+related meetings, bibliography, etc) integrated relational data sets relevant to collective action (organizations, problems, strategies, etc) emergent order, patterns of coherence
globality globally extensive, hierarchically organized globally extensive, hierarchically organized globally comprehensive, relational networks globally comprehensible, experientially integrative significant associations (meaning intensive)
symbol of globality . image of Earth (from the Moon) spherical configuration of links in virtual reality (tensegrity, synergetics) Mandelbrot, mandala,
psycho-centric***??? torus?
system normalization, coordination diversity of natural and social ecosystems; general systems complexity sciences emergent systems; coherent implications
knowledge organization universal classification (UDC) narrow knowledge, closed system; classification (UDC) > functional classification matrix broader knowledge, open system, logical extension; hierarchical and (relevant) functional hyperlinks counterintuitive, lateral thinking; evocative, attractive, elegant, "seductive", entraining
"space" geopolitical information knowledge inspiration
time recordable past (memorable "has been") recordable past (memorable "has been") recordable present (online updating) emergent future ("might be")
urgency isolated longer-term concerns isolated longer-term concerns partially-related urgent preoccupations (isolated crises) highly interrelated urgent concerns ("crisis of crises")
focus documents information (documents) patterns; knowledge; know-how imagination, inspiration, innovation
medium
paper-based documentation; museum electronic from paper-based documentation >> refererence books web; electronically
hyperlinked entities
pattern resonance (morphogenetic fields)?
relationships
(recognition)
logical
membership
legal
logical
membership
legal, operational
logical, functional
membership
legal, operational
potential, imaginative, complementary
unilateral bilateral/reciprocal loops in systems (networks) mobius?
cognitive engagement attribution of/to predetermined
categories
descriptively (classification as a substitute for knowing) intelligibly (knowing as a substitute for imagining possibilities) engaging imaginatively (implication entrainment)
expression concrete action fields of practice preoccupations values
communication / dialogue face-to-face through formal representation electronic communication; learning environments meaningful, integrative implication
representativity, authority authoritative legitimate informed advocates (lobbys) expertise, excellence succinct; aphorism
viability (sustaining
resources)
subsidy marketed
information product
competitive project funding self-funding; LETS?
ambition

presentation and
representation

representation
of civil society
re-presentation
of action-enabling patterns
pattern embodiment
("Be the Change")
ethical,
accountability
. token minority issue
responsiveness
global engagement

The above table indicates how each stage is characterized by a progressive dematerialization (or virtualization) of the distinct "vehicle" for the identity that it engenders and "incubates" for the following stage:

  • Stage 0/1: the identity is essentially legal and focused on processing paper documents within a physical office
    • challenged by the logistics of the collection of information and normalization of profiles.
  • Stage 2: primarily characterized by the virtual identity defined by strategic intent, independently funded programmes, supportive software and groupware, relational databases and a "presence" in cyberspace
    • challenged by sustaining patterns of hyperlinks and deriving meaning from them. Legally, efforts might be made to define this identity in terms of "intellectual property" -- although this is increasingly irrelevant to a rapidly evolving cyberspace world characterized by open source developments, most notably in the field of reference information.
  • Stage 3/0: the identity is primarily characterized by collective comprehension of imaginative potential associations emerging from patterns of relationship

The process of virtualization may usefully be understood as a process of disidentification -- well-understood metaphorically in the psychological disidentification of a child from its parents. As a consequence, and as conventionally understood, there is no active interface between Stage 1 and 2, or between Stage 2 and 3, other than that internalized within the individuals operating according to both logics.

Associated disintegrative processes

The dematerialization described above -- with the progressive emergence of a subtler identity -- is necessarily paralleled by the progressive distintegration of structures and processes supportive of the more concrete attributes of earlier forms of identity that were effectivel,y superceded.

Membership indifference: Although token membership is a relatively benign characteristic of many international associations, its consequences become problematic in times of crisis, especially financial crises calling for strategic decision-making -- most evident for UIA1 from 2004. The lack of financial obligation on membership of UIA1 compounded their indifference to any statutory obligations in election and verification of the work of administrators. It has indeed been the case that UIA1 neither did anything for its members nor sought effectively to benefit from their membership.

Faced with a severe challenge of institutional survival, it is clear that such a membership could not be expected to respond in a timely manner, with appropriate competence, to the strategic challenges and technical opportunities of an emeging information society. Eminence is not an automatic guarantee of competence, notably to ensure the viability of an enterprise. This might be considered the dilemma of democracy in micrcosm -- especially one characterized by an aging population, as much caring as in need of care. What may be valuable as prudence, may prove fatal (as a "dead hand") when risks need to be taken to survive.

Effective abdication of administrators: Faced with a range of short- and long-term strategic and management challenges, those elected to positions of statutory responsibility tended themselves to adopt strategies of denial and decision-making avoidance. For many in key statutory positions, a principle measure of their self-esteem is how little information they require to make an informed decision with full confidence. The long-term, contractually-supported publishing programmes of UIA were presented as obviating the need for detailed comprehension of the viability of a multi-facetted, self-funded institution. The apparent need for minimally awareness thereby gave unusual significance to any process of being "briefed".

The laissez-faire attitude was associated with a minimal paper trail relating to the initiative or activity of elected administrators, notably recent Secretarys-General or Presidents. Any risks were mitigated by the manner in which statutory meetings could be used for a process of "self-laundering" through which responsibility for past inadequacies was formally absolved -- or attributed to administrations of the past. This pattern is of course a widespread characteristic of governance.

Although purporting to subscribe to ethical values, no effort was made to formulate them -- in contrast to the practice in international bodies sensitive to this dimension. This absence of standards undermined arguments for accountability -- currently a widespread concern in relation to bodies like the UIA. Whilst severely challenged ethically, any implications were avoided by the limited accountability required by passive Council and "Active" membership.

A significant gap was therefore cultivated betweeen the statutory responsibilities of elected retirees from well-funded institutional environments (whether intergovernmental, academic or corporate) who effectively abdicated responsibility for the viability of the intiative in favour of Secretariat staff in order to avoid accountability. Staff were employed at non-commercial salaries and encouraged to subscribe to an altruistic ethos to mitigate demands for more appropriate working conditions. This pattern is evident in widespread dependency by governmentand corporate systems on the initiatives of civil society in compensating for their inadequacies.

Operational constraints: It could be considered extraordinary that an initiative like the UIA, specialized in the processing of information on the universe of international organizations, was itself severely constrained in its ability to articulate useful knowledge about its own challenging condition and opportunities. This took several distinct forms:

  • constrained ability to produce and distribute:
    • administrative documents, especially relevant to it financial situation, even when formally required
    • formal letters, notably in the cause of instiutional and public relations
    • proposals, notably in response to funding opportunities
    • strategic business plans
  • preference for a simplification of issues (effectively a "dumbing down"), cultivating what was tantamount to "functional illiteracy", that was not commensurate with the opportunities and dangerously negligent in relation to the challenges
  • erosion of collective institutional memory, ironical in a body seeking to celebrate its centenary -- but tragically reminscent of the memory problems of people of commensurate age and the difficulty of coherent dialogue with them

Unfortunately a characteristic shared by members of the UIA Bureau elected in 2005 was their direct association with the failure of past initiatives of other bodies in which they had individually played significant roles. This involvement has variously resulted in their cessation of activity (or its continuing token operation as a "shell" emptied of significance), loss of investment, bankruptcy, or even legal proceeds by those affected. Concern about the management and strategic implications of such commonalities had not been voiced in the statutory meetings of the UIA.

Consultancy errors: Although UIA1 made occasional use of consultants for technical matters, and as an outsourcing device for financial reasons, their use regarding its strategic and managerial dilemmas was typically avoided -- rationalized in part by the financial implications. In consequence, on those occasions when such expertise was sought, reliance was based on those with direct or indirect association with the organization. This resulted in processes which undermined the effectiveness of the expertise due to inability (of all parties) to distinguish clearly between advice and intervention offered: as friends of the organization (or of some associated with it), as consultants in a pro bono mode, or as elected administrators (or members) with formal responsibilities. Those involved in this way also tended to shift between these modes in a manner that could be readily labelled as unprofessional, especially in the absence of any critical perspective on such dynamics.

Those active in this way in the period 2004-2007:

  • were much constrained in their ability to communicate with each other in order to develop a coherent approach (one resigned)
  • focused their attention on Secretariat staff:
    • avoiding any challenges relating to decision-making and communication with the Council and wider membership, notably on the part of their elected Bureau
    • ensuring the marginalization of more senior staff with functional titles and responsibilities, or line authority
    • empowering more junior staff with no management or wider experience
  • prided themselves on:
    • their capacity to encourage staff to view their situation optimistically in a positive light
    • the degree of open-ended experimentation with the creative potential of those effectively made responsible for strategic decisions regarding the survival of their own jobs
  • avoided consideration of:
    • any cautionary signals
    • statutory constraints on the changes they enabled, and the responsibilities for them
    • conscious or unconscious power relations, including those introduced by those operating in a consultancy role
  • ensured that:
    • there would be no conceivable circumstances in which it would be appropriate to conclude that their intervention had exacerbated the situation -- possibly disastrously so -- or to question the benefit they derive from that intervention
    • absence of timely decision-making was not their responsibility, irrespective of the financial disasters to which it might give rise
    • external factors (such as a foreseen publisher cutback) could be used as an excuse for strategic failure

The learning for an organization in the position of UIA1 is the need to be wary of the mandate of consultants:

  • without management expertise relevant to a non-profit publishing enterprise, but who are allowed to acquire the power to pretend to such expertise (or to make others responsible for failure to manfest that expertise)
  • who hold the personal conviction that all situations should only be framed as positive -- including severe loss of income ("on their watch") theatening the very survival of the organization
  • committed to implementing experimental forms of organization -- without constraints despite unproven relevance to the concrete situation
  • free to reframe empowerment processes as enabling "self-management" when they might otherwise be recognized as having questionable sect-like qualities (verging on the "clappy-happy")
  • never assailed by doubt

Collapse of polar tensions: The rapid post-partum decline of UIA2, can usefully be described in terms of a collapse in the polar tensions (and strategic ambiguities) which enabled it to engender UIA3. In the resorption of UIA2 into UIA1, it traded the complex challenge of the strategic dilemmas of the emerging information society for a simplistic strategy of earlier decades. This shift may be interpreted simply as a transition to a distinct culture previously latent in a more complex organization. The collapsed polar tensions include the following:

Table 3: Indicating collapse of polar tensions and dilemmas
(NB: The transition from Culture A to Culture B may also be seen as the resolution of a legitmate clash of cultures)
Culture A > Culture B
positive opportunities / negative constraints > positive opportunities (denial of the negative)
male / female staffing and perspectives > female-only perspectives (marginalization of male perspectives)
French / English administrative challenge > English-only (as the preferred alternative for Flemish staff)
international / national balance > Belgium-only (through lack of provision for non-EU staff)
multicultural / single culture > single culture
no meetings / minimum meetings (for administrative purposes) > frequent meetings (despite work pressure)
management documentation / minimum documentation > minimum documentation (avoiding preparatory or recorded articulation of issues)
ethical / unethical > unethical
open (transparent) / closed (nontransparent) > closed
professional / unprofessional > unprofessional
statutory / non-statutory > non-statutory
information (marketing) /
information (potential)
> information (marketing)
information management /
knowledge management
> information management
Bureau (Council) management /
Secretariat management
> Secretariat management
long-term (historical and future) /
short-term (doable and centenary)
> short-term -- ahistorical
issue concern / neutrality > neutrality
informed (critical) perspective /
documentary perspective
> uninformed documentary perspective
voluntary / paid > paid
research / information (business) > information (business)
value-based strategy /
business marketing strategy
> business marketing strategy
attributing strategic value to information /
attributing commercial value
> attributing commercial value
enabling people to do what needed to be done /
empowering people to decide what needed to be done
> empowering people to decide what needed to be done
pride in organization strategic position and operational viability /
pride in individual power positions within organization irrespective of viability
> pride in individual power positions within organization irrespective of viability
paper / electronic documents > wall documents (flip charts)

Symptoms of "organizational sickness": Studies of organizational development have shown that dysfunctionality ("sick organizations") tends to evoke illness in those people working in such a context. Beyond absenteeism, the patterns of ill-health amongst those associated with UIA1 therefore merit careful consideration as indicators of dangerous organizational dysfunctionality. In the period from 2003, severe, even life-threatening, conditions were evident in all those performing roles of Assistant Secretary-General, or with major operational responsibility. This was also the case with the President. Although possibly coincidental, it could be argued that these were the people in some way obliged to internalize personally the conflicted decision-making dilemmas of UIA1. No significance was attached to this phenomenon.

Reclaiming the heritage of misappropriated collective endeavour

A separate exploration (Reclaiming the Heritage of Misappropriated Collective Endeavour: the case of the Union of Intelligible Associations, 2007) focuses on the various understandings of the "existence" of collective "national" and "international" bodies, the ownership of their (intellectual) "property" in an increasingly open information society, and the claims that may "legitimately" be made on both by those who actively sustain or develop such property over decades. Such considerations are especially relevant in the transition over a century through the colonial era to one in which post-colonialist, participative values are promoted and upheld.

Introduction
Conflicting claims to territory and property: real or virtual
"Existence" of collective entities
Value context
Deprecated arguments
Exploitation of contractual relationships
Reclaiming a heritage

The emergence of a Union of Intelligible Associations, or subsequently a Union of Imaginable Associations, may therefore be understood as a progressive reclaiming of a heritage of misappropriated collective endeavour.

Comprehending the transformative challenge of "stages" and their relationship

The start of the 21st century inherits an immense variety of organizational "bodies" -- "bodies corporate" -- understood to be established de jure or de facto. Many more continue to be created worldwide. However it is also witness to the emergence of a multitude of "networks" and virtual entities within cyberspace -- often "associations" of the most informal and ephemeral kind (listservs, newsgroups, blogs). These are however well-recognized as a challenge to policy-making by conventional bodies. Some bodies corporate also establish a "presence" in cyberspace, and more recently in virtual worlds (cf Second Life: Your World. Your Imagination).

This period also sees a degree of challenge to the rationale, credibility and mandate of bodies corporate -- especially when many of their functions are increasingly performed more effectively and rapidly through virtual organizations and loose networks. What values do incorporated bodies really represent in contrast to virtual entities? For what aspirations are they a more appropriate vehicle? Concerns may be expressed for the demise of such a body -- possibly even articulated in terms of the loss of its "soul" -- when valued activities are reduced (or "gutted") and distorted to other ends, if only those of survival. Commentary on such tendencies also makes reference to the fundamental importance of team "spirit", whether as valued by its members or through efforts by "animators" to imbue groups with such spirit to enhance their effectiveness, morale, creativity or productivity.

The intent here is not to explore any 3-fold ontology (or theology) of organizational "body", "soul" and "spirit" -- as distinguished in some management literature. Rather the focus is on the nature of distinct vehicles for collective intent -- and of how a vehicle of one form may effectively be necessary in order to engender another of subtler form and greater integrity and efficacy. Nor is the intent thereby to frame a potentially discriminatory scale of excellence through privileging a particular form. As will be shown, distinct stages may well be more fruitfully understood as interrelated in a cycle, such that the seemingly subtlest necessarily engages in the process of engendering the most concrete. Each stage may then be understood as a transitional vehicle through which insight and action are expressed in response to challenges and opportunity.

Dimensions: There are however challenges to understanding such relationships, as indicated by the following "dimensions":

  • structurally distinctions can be made between an understanding in terms of stages, then to be related within a cycle, then calling upon a counter-intuitive twist. The challenge of stages lies in a propensity for elitist distortions. The distortion for any cycle is the closure it may imply against alternative perspectives ("circling the wagons", "us and them", "gated comunities"). Counter-intuition calls for a challenging degree of self-reflexiveness ("I have seen the enemy and them is us").

  • distinctions in degree of cognitive engagement can be made between a (safe) objective approach to any description, then to be opened to the implication of the observer as an active participant in what is described (whether stages, cycle, or self-reflexion), who may then be understood as embodying or engendering those distinctions from a continuum of possibility

  • contrasting distinctions with regard to integrity (as variously understood) can be made between upholding a coherent set of values, acting consequentially in the promotion of those values, and creating a focal point for transformative cultivation of those values (as in "planting" educational institutions or churches). Since each is implied by the other to some degree, a particular challenge is recognizing the profound distinction between coherence upheld, engaging in its promotion, and sustaining such coherence through creation of appropriate institutions. The global integrity of the value set, upheld in principle, readily obscures the integrative nature of appropriately grounding that global understanding in practice.

  • irrespective of the degree of engagement, in evaluating performance distinctions may be made between a heroic role, a role as (sacrificial) victim of uncontrollable circumstances, and one of inappropriate response (whether resulting from ignorance, negligence, or malign intent)

  • distinctions between degrees of materialization of integration, ranging from incorporation (typical of UIA1), through virtual organization based on pattern recognition (typical of UIA2), to potential association (typical of UIA3). Incorporation in the case of UIA1 may be understood as aspiring to assembly of members rather than information. "Union" in the case of UIA2 as members of a set (in a logical sense). UIA3 as remembering -- in the sense of the phrase: "We can't put it together; it is together" (The (Updated) Last Whole Earth Catalog, 1974), or Antonio de Nicolas (Remembering the God to Come, 1988)

  • personal bias (as noted earlier) and self-serving distortions / subjective, complex adaptive ***

Metaphors of stage separation and emergence

The challenges to comprehension implied by the rich pattern of distinctions (above) highlight the need to use metaphor to explore ways of comprehending the relationship between UIA1, UIA2 and UIA3. Metaphor is frequently used in the management literature to explore the nature of organizational transition (Sonja Sackmannand, The Role of Metaphors in Organization Transformation, Human Relations, 1989; Haridimos Tsoukas, The Missing Link: a transformational view of metaphors in organizational science, Academy of Management Review, 1991). This has been the theme of many studies under the notional auspices of UIA1 (Documents relating to Metaphor for Governance). Although a more extensive range of metaphors might be usefully considered, the principal metaphors used are:

Each such metaphor of course introduces particular distortions. Any such metaphors should be considered complementary, notably to the extent that they overemphasize male or female bias. The predesigned explicit staging characteristic of the rocket metaphor seemingly obscures the structural emergence characteristic of development from an egg within a womb. Understanding of such "nesting" over generations is partially exemplified by so-called Russian dolls (Matryoschka). Given the ambitious scope implied by the Mundaneum, in more symbolic and archetypal terms some consideration might also be given to archetypal symbols such as: Anima Mundi -- with documents understood as Prima Materia assembled in an effort to understand what animates the world.

Rocket metaphor: The comparison of the sequence to that of a 3-stage rocket -- with UIA1 as the first stage through which the launch of UIA3 is finally enabled, is consonant with a separate exploration of an astrophysical metaphor as the basis for the organization of knowledge space and the challenges of comunication across it (cf Towards an Astrophysics of the Knowledge Universe: from astronautics to noonautics?, 2006). This notably makes reference to a later work of Paul Otlet (Monde: Essai d'universalisme, 1935) as well as to the challenge of "escape" so effectively explored by Erik Davis (TechGnosis: myth, magic and mysticism in the age of information. 1998/2004) and reviewed as an Annex of that study (TechGnosis -- Gnostic Escape in a Knowledge Universe: embodied in a regrounding and re-Earthing process, 2007).

Reference is also made there to the initiative of Joseph Campbell (The Inner Reaches of Outer Space: metaphor as myth and as religion, 1986) in a series of symposia with that theme touching on the implications of the Space Age for an appropriate new mythology. This is consistent with the pioneering insights of the Renaissance scholar Marsilio Ficino (Composing the Present Moment: celebrating the insights of Marsilio Ficino interpreted by Thomas Moore, 2001).

Within the astronautics metaphor, the performance of a "UIA" 3-stage rocket (accepting the dematerialization of each successive stage), might be described in the following terms:

  • UIA1: Union of International Associations
    • space: documentation space (UIA0) or information space (UIA1) -- in support of an information society (Information Systems and Inter-Organizational Space, 1971)
    • objective: escape velocity for paradigm shift:
    • fuel: concentrating, organizing and deriving (economic value) power from resources
    • viability: challenged by project logic / economic / short-term / burn-up / hope-mongers ***
    • long-term booster rockets:
      • organization-related profiling (incl. biography and bibliography)
      • meeting-related profiling (incl proceedings bibliographies)
      • statistical data (for academic and market research)
  • UIA2: Union of Intelligible Associations
    • space: knowledge space -- in support of a knowledge society (not know-how?**)
    • objective: eliciting meaningful patterns
    • strategic / situation rooms / command-control / sauver les meubles / modelling
    • excludes aesthetic creativity although rehearsing it
    • viability: challenged by ***
  • UIA3: Union of Imaginable Associations
    • space: imagination/inspiration space -- in support an imagination/inspiration society (in response to dropping knowledge***)
    • objective: cognitive engagement with patterns
    • imagination / nature / open-ended / possibility
    • includes/dependent on aesthetic creativity
    • viability: challenged by *** reality reframed

Game-playing

  • statutory game-playing, typical of international NGOs acting in imitation of the United Nations
  • technical game-playing, typical of computer-based strategies in response to the explosion of opportunity
  • power game playing, typical of personal relations within many institutions and of the relations between collective intiatives
  • infinite games, in contrast to the "finite games" above (exemplified by James P. Carse (Finite and Infinite Games: a vision of life as play and possibility, 1986)

Metaphors of problematic stage separation: Given the role of distinct stages, whatever the metaphor, particular attention can be given to the use of metaphor in describing problems in stage separation:

  • rocket case: failure of control, communication, energy or mechanical closure processes, achieving orbit or escape velocity
  • pregnancy case: infertility, birth disorders, eclampsia, the painful process of giving birth, and the umbilical cord
  • familial case: prolonged dependency ( "mummy's boy" problem), sibling relationships -- cuckoo / eclampsia complementarity
  • pathology: malnourishment, cancer, exhaustion, stress ***
  • game-playing

new mindsets, paradigm -- umbilical ***

Metaphors of post-separation outcome: Also of interest is the use of metaphor in understanding what happens to an earlier stage after successful separation (post partum):

  • rocket case: does the superceded stage remain in low-level orbit (as a monument to past achievement), return to earth (to be recovered for salvage or as a monument), or burn-up in doing so? Such possibilities are especially interesting in the light of the problematic accumulation of space debris in orbit around the planet, notably including spent rocket stages. As memorials to old initiatives, should many organizations, whose transformation potential is exhausted, be compared to such orbiting space debris -- whether inert (like the sister organization of UIA1), or symbolically active (like the parent of UIA1)? Should UIA1, like the RMS Queen Mary, be "towed into a parking orbit" where minimal activity can be sustained -- and from which the globe can be scanned as from the observation deck of the Empire State Building -- with or without a skeleton crew? In this respect, it is noteworthy that a number of "dead" international organizations continue to have a ghostly post-mortem existence through online access to their archival databases -- possibly the fate of UIA2.
  • biological case: is the superceded stage consumed by the next stage (as with some insects), simply abandoned, or respectfully cared for?
  • familial case: the Mundaneum has been successfully funded as a museum by French-speaking Wallonia but, despite its maternal role for UIA1, there has been little to no contact between them for decades; similarly, following the discontinuation of use by UIA1 of the Universal Decimal Classification in 1972, there was no formal contact with its sister organization the FID (which championed the UDC until the end)*** postpartum depression

The superceded vehicle may not simply disappear but may continue to perform tasks relevant to mindsets only perceived by some to be outmoded. Its function may be reframed, possibly in commemoration of what it enabled in ensuring the viability of the subsequent stage.

As indicated earlier, a story of larger scope would consider the relationship of UIA1, as reconstituted after 1948, to the form initiated in 1907 (UIA0 ), acquiring the same name in 1910, and how that emerged, or became distinct, from the Mundaneum. ***

Evocative questions: It is a mistake to stretch metaphors beyond their usefulness, but some evocative questions may be fruitfully considered. The challenge to comprehension raises at least five distinct issues:

  • why are a number of distinct "stages" apparently necessary in any developmental process requiring some form of paradigm shift?
  • is a minimum number of such stages required to escape unwanted or "dysfunctional" constraints -- whether a physical gravity well or a cognitive gravity well?
  • what is the requisite number of complementary metaphors needed to encompass the subtlety of the distinctions between stages -- together engendering an integrative pattern of understanding based on resonance between them?
  • what is the minimum number of distinct booster/guidance systems necessary to initiate and sustain the stability of any "escape"?
  • to what extent are these distinctions artificially made in response to a continuum of transformation / metamorphosis?

As vehicles of human initiative and understanding,
and as focal symbols of collective pride and expertise,
which international bodies can be fruitfully compared:


-- to RMS Titanic (in ignoring vulnerabilities)?
-- to RMS Queen Mary (now permanently docked as an entertainment facility)?
-- to the space shuttle Challenger (having ignored engineering feedback)?

How should ambitions to captain or crew such vehicles then be understood
-- especially for what becomes their final journey?

Distinguishing stages in the light of potential (mis)understanding

Misunderstandings are inherent in the succession of identities of "UIA", whether experienced by those external to their decision -making or those within them. The associated ambiguity may be exploited to various ends, excarbating the misunderstanding.

Understanding of UIA1 is potentially confused by: a sense of comprehensiveness with implications of hierarchical closure of knowledge classification and legally institutionalized membership; reinforced by UN recognition of UIA1 as a legal entity, cooptation of elite membership, implications of "unionisation" (subsuming initiatives of other bodies), and assumptions of special expertise. Any such outmoded "imperial" roles may be dysfunctionally attractive to those seeking to benefit from their association with it, whether organizationally or personally. Mistaken assumptions may be made about the capacity to target international associations with marketing messages and campaign appeals. There may be a degree of deliberate exploitation of this ambiguity to sustain credibility, attract resources and ensure operational viability.

Understanding of UIA2 is potentially confused by: failure to comprehend its status as a strategic intiative rather than as a legal entity; a focus on the strategic potential of its information for the promotion of political agendas (eg UN system, advocacy bodies), commercial agendas (eg meetings industry), security agendas (social network analysis for the detection of threat). This may encourage an emphasis on mapping complex static patterns of relationship and their visualization -- in a period desperate for simple responses to complex problems, meaningful participative engagement, enhanced by multimedia, and responsive to preferences for a variety of ways of knowing. This confusion may inhibit recognition of the degree of successful adaptation of UIA2 to the technical and conceptual developments of the complexities and openness of the emerging knowledge society.

Potential confusion in understanding the role of UIA3: the seeming irresponsibility of emphasis on aesthetic integration, radical individualism supported by the subjective dynamics of a virtual multimedia environment with its problematic relationship to concreteness and long-term initiatives (in the "real world"). Confusion is exacerbated by problematic relationship to ungrounded dysfunctional subjective obsession with arbitrary integrative comprehension (groupthink, "everything connected to everything"), as well as the problematic distinction from the dysfunctionality of faith-based initiatives (see below).

Interrelating possibilities for (mis)understanding : Such potential for confusion may be explained and clarified in the following Table 5 -- adapted and developed from Arthur Young's Geometry of Meaning (1978). Note that other adaptations (and commentaries) of potential relevance to this exploration include a Typology of 12 complementary strategies essential to sustainable development (1998), Characteristics of phases in 12-phase learning / action cycles (1998), Typology of 12 complementary dialogue modes essential to sustainable dialogue, Characteristics of phases in 12-phase learning / action cycles (1998), Further Constraints on Conceptual Container Design (Part 5 of Development through Alternation, 1983), Varieties of experience of past-present-future complexes (2001), Functional Complementarity of Higher Order Questions psycho-social sustainability modelled by coordinated movement (2004). Some of these formed part of the commentaries to Encyclopedia of World Problems and Human Potential.

Table 5 (below) could be understood as a presentation of two modes of institutional learning (including learning within institutions):

  • from UIA1, UIA2 to UIA3 (as noted above).
  • "within" each stage in terms of progression through levels of (mis)understanding and projection by insiders or outsiders.

The symbols used in the table may be ignored. They derive from the efforts of Arthur Young (as inventor of the Bell helicopter) to relate the challenge of controlling a vehicle (operating in three dimensional space) to the complexity of the 12 different physical factors (measure formulae used in physics to describe the motion of a body) that needed to be taken into account. He endeavoured to extend these insights to apply to learning and action in psychosocial situations -- as being of equivalent complexity at least. It is assumed here that they are of relevance to understanding the challenges of navigating in knowledge space as discussed elsewhere (Navigating Alternative Conceptual Realities: clues to the dynamics of enacting new paradigms through movement, 2002).

Table 5: Two modes of institutional learning
(adaptation of an analysis of action-learning cycles by Arthur Young)
. UIA1
Acts Abstract Schematic

M0L = C / A***
UIA2
States Motivated Considered

ML = F . / I
UIA3
Relationships Application Follow-through Commitment
ML2 = M / U
Conscious 
(Re-volution)
Unconscious 
(In-volution)
T0 L. Observation; act of considering; position determination; reactive learning based on immediate registration of phenomena; assessment of distance; "sizing up" ML. Recognition of moment(ousness), relevance (as related to leverage), significance (as in "matters of great moment"); weight of facts; bringing matters into focus ML2 Faith in current paradigm or perception of reality; unexamined or habitual commitment to a process projection or understanding, irrespective of inconsistent disturbing factors Timeless awareness 
Non-duration
Unconscious registration of information
T-1 L./T Adaptive change; reaction; passive adaptation or change of position in response to changing circumstances ML./T Recognition of the momentum (of an issue) resulting from a change, namely the consequential transformation of awareness or perspective ML2/T Decision or impulse to act or initiate a process determining the future Conscious adaptive response 
Awareness
Homeostatic equilibrium 
Unconscious adaptation
T-2 L/T2 Spontaneous initiation of transformative action; commitment to a new course of action ML/T2 Forcefulness engendered, experienced or embodied as a result of transformative action; constructive (or disruptive) action potential; enhanced sense of being ML2/T2 Achievement of a desired result by application of understanding (and adjustment of implicit beliefs) in response to external factors; working action on reality 
 
Comparison with norms or memory of previous experience 
Self-awareness 
Auto-catalytic response 
Self-impulsion
T-3 L/T3 Control of transformative action ML/T3 Establishment of disciplined pattern of response; consolidated or harmonious control of action potential; holding forces in check ML2/T3 Power of acquired knowledge; know-how; integrated or embodied experience; capacity (including that of not acting); non-action Comparison with previous comparisons 
Awareness of self-awareness 
Transendental discontinuity
Uncoordinated action 
Victim of discontinuity
Conscious 
(Re-volution)
Intentional shift of 
- perspective 
- position 
- reference 
Range of conscious attention span 
"Distance" from object of focus
(see MLT0) Projection of an intended shift of perspective into reality . Time-binding
Unconscious 
(In-volution)
Unintended shift of: 
- perspective 
- position 
- reference 
Displacement of focus
Unconscious impression of significance Subject to an unintended shift of perspective Space-binding Learning via...

The above table is helpful with respect to the:

  • "degrees of comprehension" of UIA1, UIA2 and UIA3 -- especially as models of institutional challenges in wider society to which they respond. UIA1, UIA2 or UIA3 are more readily understood at the "T0" level. However such understanding may obscure appreciation of their respective endeavours at levels T-1, T-2, or T-3. Such appreciation may be as much a challenge to comprehension for outside observers as for informed insiders. Whether UIA1, UIA2 or UIA3, there may be a real challenge to expressing the insights associated with T-2, or T-3. Inadequate efforts to do so may readily reinforce unfortunate understanding of those endeavours -- especially pretensions and illusions encouraging narrow ambitions. Such insights effectively reframe the understanding of the nature and focus of the activity -- "what the initiative is really about". Typically this would be variously understood -- or misunderstood -- by collaborators, decision-makers and outsiders.
  • appropriateness: in highlighting the challenge that each stage (UIA1, UIA2 and UIA3) poses for a subsequent stage -- that it may engender through its own inadequacies to contextual challenges. The explanatory columns and rows of the table (on the right and below respectively) help to indicate how the focus in each row (whether for UIA1, UIA2 or UIA3) becomes more "self-reflexive" and "intense" as explored elsewhere (The Isdom of the Wisdom Society: Embodying time as the heartland of humanity, 2003), notably in the light of insights of Arthur Young into the experience of "inverse time" and "going more deeply into the present" when the "dimensionality" of the experience increases. Furthermore, from left to right, there is a transformation of focus from what might be summarized as:
    • UIA1: registering and ordering the objective world and a directive impulse to control any changes to it
    • UIA2: recognition of conditions and patterns of relationship and the system of forces in play
    • UIA3: responsiveness to conditions and engagement with them in the light of creative insight into possibilities
  • operational coherence: namely the difficulty from a UIA1 mindset of understanding the coherence and operational viability of the essentially virtual identity of UIA2 as a creature of cyberspace -- through the traces relating to copyright, software and groupware. Many organizations have been confronted by this challenge in relation to the "reality" of cyberspace initiatives -- notably in the light of striking successes and failures, whether in terms of popularity or fortunes made (or lost). In the field of reference information, for example, the viability of Wikipedia, the largest multilingual free-content encyclopedia on the internet, has been a mystery in terms of conventional business models -- and a challenge to UIA1, if not to UIA2. It is therefore to be expected that from a UIA2 mindset, comprehension of the coherence and operational viability of UIA3 would be equally challenging (and even more so from a UIA1 mindset).

Whereas the potential of UIA2 is naturally associated with the exponential development of cyberspace (including Web 2.0 and the Semantic Web), such developments need to be contrasted with another striking evolution that is more closely indicative of the potential of UIA3 -- and the difficulty of understanding it. This is the strategic coherence of the faith-based initiatives as has been only too evident in the case of the leadership of the Coalition of the Willing in justifying intervention in Iraq with unprecedented resources -- and the faith-based response of suicide bombers in totally undermining that strategy -- both in thrall to religious dogma. The "incomprehensible" nature of this "Stage 3" strategy is evident in the contrast now recognized between "faith-based" and "reality-based" decision-making at the highest level -- as noted in a much-cited article by Ron Suskind (Without a Doubt, The New York Times, In The Magazine, 17 October 2004) regarding an exchange with an aide in the decision-making circle of President Bush:

The aide said that guys like me were "in what we call the reality-based community," which he defined as people who "believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality." I nodded and murmured something about enlightenment principles and empiricism. He cut me off. "That's not the way the world really works anymore," he continued. "We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality -- judiciously, as you will -- we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do."

With respect to the above table, this faith-based reality might be understood as a potentially problematic mindset associated with the "T0" level of UIA3. The same might be said of certain forms of "positive thinking", especially as extolled in faith-based contexts (Being Positive Avoiding Negativity: management challenge of positive vs negative, 2005). A distinct form of "Stage 3", more characteristic of the emergent UIA3 discussed here, is that associated with the enactivism typical of the T-2, or T-3 levels. The enactivist approach to "laying down the path" may be usefully contrasted with a common practice of "lying about the path" one is walking -- whether to oneself or to others. (Walking Elven Pathways: enactivating the pattern that connects, 2006).

Detailed description of stages (exemplifying challenges in other organizations)

Annex 2 : Detailed description of stages (exemplifying challenges in other organizations)
   -- Stage 1: Union of International Associations (UIA1): Contextual challenges | Internal challenges
   -- Stage 2: Union of Intelligible Associations (UIA2): Contextual challenges | Internal challenges
   -- Stage 3: Union of Imaginable Associations (UIA3): Contextual challenges | Internal challenges
   Comprehension of stage separation (decoupling / detachment) in transformation processes

Conclusion

Although the stage separation dynamics, and their comprehension, are explored in greater detail in Annex 2, the insights from the analysis of the three-stage separation are perhaps best summarized below in Table 6. This is a prelude to the discussion of an integrative model in Annex 3: Psychosocial Energy from Polarization -- within a Cyclic Pattern of Enantiodromia where the focus is on relating the stages in a cycle.

Table 6: Long-term Global Dynamic of Individual-Collective Action-Comprehension
(illustrated by the 100 years of UIA methods and illusions)
. . Stage 0/1 Stage 2 Stage 3/0
Positive


Explicit
(intended outcome)

thesis

"UIA" Empowering action through collection and organization of information on hierarchies of representative civil society bodies in all fields of activity as being authoritiative, especially those assemblying them in response to coordinated intergovernmental bodies strategies Enabling collective action (and communication) through re-presenting information on complex networks and patterns of relevant entities (indicative of dynamic systems) using multimedia techniques to enhance integrative comprehension.
**Inter-Contact
Enabling imaginative associations to embody coherence. Personal immediacy
Self-reliance
Own coherence
Dynamic
2nd order cybernetics
Global
context
globe
legitmation of colonial exploitation

globe***, spin, value reversal
counter-intuitive, lateral
surveillance
knowledge orverlaod

(Second Life).
faith-based
cocoon
gated, forting-up
spherical
Embodied contradictions/
Creativity ambiguity
"UIA" Faced with proliferation of civil society bodies, UIA0/1 implied to be a prime focus sought by IGOs (seeking a single voice and single channel), meetings industry (seeking a single interface for marketing), academe (seeking comprehensive statistics), or civil society advocacy groups (seeking assistance and mailing addresses). Meaning in priciple does not readily translate into meaning in practice.

.

.
Global
context
.

Emergence of complex models, global plans, hybrid initiatives (WEF, WSF, etc), virtual organization

Unresolved response to stereotyping, groupthink and unshared comprehension (alternative ways of knowing and recognizing meaning)

cultural variety
scale and urgency
spin

.
-

Implicit
(unsaid,
unsayable, effective outcome)

anti-thesis

"UIA" Information overload and underuse. Democractic deficit. Apathy. Inadequacy of coordination. Meaning dependency.
Hope-mongering
Knowledge overload and underuse
Recognition of inadequacy of "alternatives". Erosion of credibility of authority. Undeliverability of programmatic promises, including reform. Inadequate response to surprises. Gameplaying. Endemic corruption. Cynicism, fatalism. "Renegotiation" of human rights. Non-convergence on solutions.
Grounding, embodying, embodiment of collective...
inspiration overload and underuse;
suicide
Global
context
.

.

faith-based, conspiracy theory, spam, groupthink

Some general conclusions are of course proposed in the main paper Emergence of a Union of Imaginable Associations: engendered by a Union of Intelligible Associations from a Union of International Association


creative commons license
this work is licenced under a creative commons licence.