-- / --
The challenge of interrelating seemingly incompatible threads of discourse in more fruitful ways was explored in an earlier paper (Interweaving Thematic Threads and Learning Pathways, 2010). As noted there, the thread metaphor had previously been developed by Jennifer Gidley (A Macrohistorical Planetary Tapestry: the fascinating integral narratives of Steiner, Gebser and Wilber, 2007) as part of her exploration of The Evolution of Consciousness as a Planetary Imperative (2007) . The question is how any such weaving relates to the challenges of global governance, notably as tentatively explored previously (Planetary Challenge of 12-fold Strategic Marriage, 2003; Warp and Weft: Governance through Alternation: world governance as a Gandhian challenge for the individual, 2002).
The purpose here is merely to point to the possibility of combining the threefold weaving explored by Gidley with the quite different weaving explored by Douglas Hofstadter (Gödel, Escher, Bach: an Eternal Golden Braid, 1979). The implication is that this ninefold weaving responds to dimensions of the challenge of governance neglected by the two threefold weavings considered individually.
The argument is made most succinctly, if simplistically, by the following presentation -- and the reflection it invites. The suggestion is that the pattern is necessarily not definitive but is rather indicative of the kinds of qualities and complexity that may be necessary for fruitful integration -- the requisite complexity for which knowledge cybernetics may call (Comprehension of Requisite Variety for Sustainable Psychosocial Dynamics, 2006). It of course makes use of the insights of contemporary authors although this does not preclude the possibility of an equivalent pattern based on the earlier authors to which each may also refer.
|Fig. 1: Pattern of ninefold interweaving|
|.||3-fold Interweaving (Gidley, 2007)|
|Rudolf Steiner||Jean Gebser||Ken Wilber||medium||epistemological challenge
to singular worldviews
|Kurt Gödel||Gödel-Steiner||Gödel-Gebser||Gödel-Wilber||logic||inherent incompleteness of
|M. C. Escher||Escher-Steiner||Escher-Gebser||Escher-Wilber||depiction||paradoxical self-reflexivity
requiring a cognitive twist
|J. S. Bach||Bach-Steiner||Bach-Gebser||Bach-Wilber||music||comprehensive exploration of
harmony in variation
(as cited by Gidley)
a cognitive/conceptual emphasis on the development of consciousness; orienting largely-agreed-upon generalizations from the various branches of knowledge
There is necessarily a challenge to articulating the cognitive characteristics of each set of authors. It might be said that:
In the case of the Steiner-Gebser-Wilber modalities, they are suggestively understood as "cognitive telescopes" -- each based on different "design principles" -- through which intuitions of more integrative understanding are brought into focus -- as with the use by astronomers of various kinds of telescope (reflecting mirror, infra-red, radio, etc). The need to "see" larger wholes has notably been explored by Joël de Rosnay (The Macroscope: a new world view, 1979). This need also applies notably with respect to time, whether the past or the future (Engaging Macrohistory through the Present Moment, 2004; Presenting the Future, 2001). To the extent that development of consciousness is understood through metaphors of "up" (rather than "down"), and "ascent", or even "escape" (as with respect to gravity), many religions offer pointers in such terms as discussed in Clues to 'Ascent' and 'Escape' (2002) in an exploration of Navigating Alternative Conceptual Realities: clues to the dynamics of enacting new paradigms through movement (2002).
Incommensurability and antipathy: The systems associated with the constituent authors of each "trinity" are averse to one another to a curious (if necessary) degree. In detailed argument of this point, Gidley (2007, p. 13) notes with respect to the Steiner-Gebser-Wilber modality:
All three of these authors have large global communities who draw on their work with apparently little conversation between them, either academically or professionally. I do not believe that isolationist approaches any longer serve the planetary community, given that all these approaches have much to contribute to the challenges our planetary community faces.
Gidley also notes the extent to which each of the three accords little attention to the others.
These factors play out in the competitive relationship between their interpreters and followers as may be provocatively illustrated (Epistemological Challenge of Cognitive Body Odour: exploring the underside of dialogue, 2006; Dynamically Gated Conceptual Communities: emergent patterns of isolation within knowledge society, 2004). As Gidley notes however, with respect to her own approach:
From a formal perspective the narratives of Steiner, Gebser and Wilber on the evolution of consciousness could be seen as rival integral schemes. I have attempted to show how the honoring of all three in their uniqueness can actually strengthen rather than weaken the entire integral project. (p. 133)
The systems are not constituted such as to be able to internalise any interplay between them -- a theme explored by Nicholas Rescher (The Strife of Systems: an essay on the grounds and implications of philosophical diversity, 1985; Pluralism: against the demand for consensus, 1993) concluding that:
For centuries, most philosophers who have reflected on the matter have been intimidated by the strife of systems. But the time has come to put this behind us -- not the strife, that is, which is ineliminable, but the felt need to somehow end it rather than simply accept it and take it in stride.
A provocative celebration of anarchism in the knowledge environment is however offered by Paul Feyerabend (Against Method: outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge, 1975; Conquest of Abundance: a tale of abstraction versus the richness of being, 1999). Irrespective of any cognitive confusion, this offers a fruitful contrast to the singular "taste" metaphorically offered by Ken Wilber (One Taste: daily reflections on integral spirituality, 2000).
It is most curious that the challenge of engaging with any "other" through dialogue is framed in English by use of the term "intercourse" -- with all the associations this offers in English to consummation of marriage and the unchecked reproduction of the human species ("Human Intercourse": "Intercourse with Nature" and "Intercourse with the Other", 2007). This is perhaps even more curious in a period widely challenged by marital breakdown and dramatic issues regarding the role of women in religion -- let alone the challenges of interfaith dialogue by many who eschew such consummation.
Bach offers an indication of how variations can be comprehensively and harmoniously explored through musical relationships -- although excluding other musical forms and patterns. However, in the terms of religious systems, Gidley's creative exercise in interweaving the silos -- which she describes with the poetic Deleusian term of creating conceptual lines of flight between the three narratives -- would readily be labelled by the followers of the Steiner-Gebser-Wilber pathways as inappropriate syncretism. Gidley, partly inspired by Wilber, explicitly endeavours 'to weave the pluralistic voices' of Steiner, Gebser, Wilber and others into a 'beautiful tapestry of integral intent'. Hofstadter's initiative, interweaving media, is readily to be understood as anathema to conventional academic thinking.
It is intriguing that the "thread" and "silo" metaphors suggest the value of thinking of threads as silos -- tunnels through which reality is claimed to be explored. The interweaving of threads offers a means of thinking beyond such linear constraints. Silos necessarily do not weave.
Self-reference: emptiness and fulfillment: Whereas the Steiner-Gebser-Wilber modality is constrained in its capacity to address with adequate self-reflexivity the identity of the author of any such singular worldview, Hofstadter subsequently addressed that cognitive challenge in his own case (I Am a Strange Loop, 2007) in the light of his own earlier argument (Gödel, Escher, Bach: an Eternal Golden Braid, 1979). It will be interesting to see whether Gidley follows suit in reinterpreting the relevance of the Steiner-Gebser-Wilber modality to the collective challenges of governance -- given her explicit appreciation of the "planetary imperative".
Hofstadter extensively explores the paradoxical nature of self-reference and has been a major contributor to a collection of papers on the matter (Uriah Kriegel and Kenneth Williford, Self-Representational Approaches to Consciousness, 2006).
There is a curious irony to the relationship between the two modalities with regard to self-reference:
Incompleteness and undecidability: The disturbing implications of Gödel's incompleteness theorems may be fruitfully used to challenge the possibility (or nature) of fundamental articulations -- made in terms of sets of a limited number of concepts or categories, as with those made in the systems of Steiner-Gebser-Wilber, specifically Gödel's arithmetical proofs that:
Such forms of incompleteness and undecidability have now been reinforced by the work of Harvey Friedman (Boolean Relation Theory and Incompleteness. 2010) through identification of entirely new forms of incompleteness. In his summary of such challenges, Richard Elwes (It doesn't add up, New Scientist, 14 August 2010) asks whether "a gaping hole has opened up in the foundations of mathematics". However, perhaps even more challenging, is what this may imply for a "gaping hole" in the foundations of philosophical reflection on the development of consciousness and the governability of the planet (Ungovernability of Sustainable Global Democracy? Towards engaging appropriately with time, 2010).
Just as the incompleteness theorems demonstrate the possibility that no "true" or "false" answer exists within fundamental arithmetical frameworks, this may be as true of philosophical statements. As stated by Elwes:
The most severe implications are philosophical. The result means that the rules we use to manipulate large numbers cannot be assumed to represent the pure and perfect truth. Rather, they are something more akin to a scientific theory such as a "standard model" that particle physicists use to predict the workings of particles and forces: our best approximation to reality... but at the same time manifestly incomplete and subject to continuous and possibly radical reappraisal...
The approaches to governance (of "large numbers" of people) founded on such philosophical assumptions may then be equally problematic. Such possibilities are consistent with:
Curiously, with respect to governability, such possibilities may also be consistent with the adage of Abraham Lincoln: You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time (Responsibility for Global Governance: Who? Where? When? How? Why? Which? What? 2008). Such challenges relate to any conclusions to be drawn with respect to governance from the several efforts at detailed computer simulation of the whole population of the world (Sentient World Simulation; Joint Simulation System).
"Large" intangibles beyond human ken: Curiously, as noted by Elwes:
With Friedman's work, it seems Gödel's delayed triumph has arrived: the final proof that if there is a universal grammar of numbers in which all facets of their behaviour can be expressed, it lies beyond our ken.... The only way that Friedman's undecidable statements can be tamed, and the integrity of arithmetic restored, is to expand Peano's rule book to include "large cardinals" -- monstrous infinite quantities whose existence can only ever be assumed rather than logically deduced.... We can deny the existence of infinity, a quantity that pervades modern mathematics, or we must resign ourselves to the idea that there are certain things about numbers we are destined never to know
Such large cardinals, notably understood to be "inaccessible", have yet to be fully admitted into the axioms of mainstream mathematics. Of interest with respect to governance is the place then to be accorded to the unknowable -- in contrast to the definitive nature of the assertions typically made. This consideration might be strangely consistent with the place accorded by Steiner to angelic hierarchies, including "Powers", "Mights", "Dominions", and "Thrones" (presented in a Table of Evolution similar to Mendeleev's Periodic Table of the Elements). Through what metaphors are intangibles "beyond human ken" to be described? Does the mathematical understanding of "large cardinals" correspond to Steiner's understanding of "powers"?
It is also potentially consistent with the much-cited verse by Lao Tzu (Tao Te Ching, ch 11):
Thirty spokes share the wheel's hub; It is the centre hole that makes it useful.
Shape clay into a vessel; It is the space within that makes it useful.
Cut doors and windows for a room; It is the holes which make it useful.
Therefore profit comes from what is there;
Usefulness from what is not there.
There is also a potentially fruitful association of "cardinals" to the more complex symmetry groups discovered by mathematicians, held to be fundamental to the organization of the universe as it is known (Potential Psychosocial Significance of Monstrous Moonshine: an exceptional form of symmetry as a Rosetta stone for cognitive frameworks, 2007). The challenge to comprehension of such complexity, and to cognitive engagement with it, is also of interest in its own right (Dynamics of Symmetry Group Theorizing: comprehension of psycho-social implication, 2008). The metaphorical devices by which a degree of understanding of such groups may be obtained through "correspondences" is also of relevance (Theories of Correspondences -- and potential equivalences between them in correlative thinking, 2007).
Metaphorical geometry: Stranger still is that it is the circle that is the most common symbol of the potential integrative fulfillment indicated by the Steiner-Gebser-Wilber modality -- perhaps best recognized in the symbol of the Ouroboros, whereas it is the loop that is so closely associated with Hofstadter's self-reference. Neither attaches great significance to the dynamics implied by such closely associated patterns nor to the identity sustained by that dynamic, whether or not it might be fruitfully understood as a standing wave (Emergence of Cyclical Psycho-social Identity: sustainability as "psyclically" defined, 2007). Although in Hofstadter's recognition of it as a cognitive feedback loop it relates to the emerging challenges of knowledge cybernetics (Maurice Yolles, Knowledge Cybernetics: a new metaphor for social collectives 2005). Given the capacity of physicists to explore beyond the "standard model", a case might be made for an analogous initiative in relation to the evolution of consciousness (Beyond the Standard Model of Universal Awareness, 2010). The integrality variously explored through the Steiner-Gebser-Wilber modality may involve a dynamic dimension -- to an extent as yet unexpected (Dynamic Reframing of "Union": implications for the coherence of knowledge, social organization and personal identity, 2003).
It might also be asked whether such inherently simple geometry is an adequate support for richer intuitions adequate to the challenges of the future (Metaphorical Geometry in Quest of Globality-- in response to global governance challenges, 2009). In this respect the arguments of Steven Rosen and Melanie Purcell regarding the Klein bottle highlight further possibilities (Intercourse with Globality through Enacting a Klein bottle: cognitive implication in a polysensorial "lens", 2009). Some possibilities are also developed in the delightfully titled argument of Sam C. Ziegler (A Cloud thats Dragonish: a description of the possible evidence of use of the Mobius Strip in pre-modern times, 2009).
With respect to governance, neither modality has much to say about the implications of such insight for collective initiatives and collective identity. Is humanity to be understood in some way as a strange loop, for example? Or perhaps we are a set of strangely interlocking loops?
And yet curiously, in the value attached to "self-fulfillment" by the Steiner-Gebser-Wilber modality might be seen the roots of a society obsessed with forms of consumption and growth which could well be fruitfully transcended. Both modalities point to the merits of what might be understood as a form of cognitive voluntary simplicity -- traditionally celebrated in many intentional communities as noted by Duane Elgin (Voluntary Simplicity: toward a way of life that is outwardly simple, inwardly rich, 1981).
"Copyright": Given Hofstadter's explicit interest in the cognitive significance of thinking and its products, there is a delightful irony to the lack of self-referential consideration by the authors of either modality to the significance of the intellectual copyright they (or their followers) so firmly associate with their insights. This lack may be further explored in the light of the argument of Gregory Bateson (Mind and Nature: a necessary unity, 1979), inspired like Hofstadter by the formalism of cybernetics, who subsequently (1987) presented his central theme in the following terms:
The significance of all this formalization was made more evident... by a reading of Carl Jung's Seven Sermons to the Dead... [I] began to think about the relation between "map" and "territory." Jung's book insisted upon the contrast between Pleroma, the crudely physical domain governed only by forces and impacts, and Creatura, the domain governed by distinctions and differences. It became abundantly clear that the two sets of concepts match and that there could be no maps in Pleroma, but only in Creatura. That which gets from territory to map is news of difference, and at that point I recognized that news of difference was a synonym for information.
When this recognition of difference was put together with the clear understanding that Creatura was organized into circular trains of causation, like those that had been described by cybernetics, and that it was organized in multiple levels of logical typing, I had a series of ideas all working together to enable me to think systematically about mental process as differentiated from simple physical or mechanistic sequences, without thinking in terms of two separate "substances". My book Mind and Nature: a necessary unity combined these ideas with the recognition that mental process and biological evolution are necessarily alike in these Creatural characteristics.
The cognitive challenge of Bateson's argument was subsequently presented by Peter Harries-Jones (A Recursive Vision: ecological understanding and Gregory Bateson, 1995):
Aesthetics provides a medium through which humanity can begin to understand the unity of the biosphere. Yet, when approaching unity and holism in the biosphere, our pragmatic, mechanistic civilization becomes overwhelmed by epistemological panic and does not know how to proceed. How then to overcome panic and pursue that "path where even angels fear to tread"? (p. 216)
The implication of intellectual copyright in relation to any form of cognitive self-transcendence has been discussed separately (Transcending Duality: epistemological panic of nonduality? 2010). The issue of property and territory is of course one of the most fundamental in global governance. There it is argued that this seemingly abstract and sterile consideration has extremely concrete implications -- well-recognized by the indigenous peoples of the world with their unique relationships to the land, as documented by Darrell A. Posey (Cultural and Spiritual Values of Biodiversity, 1999). As is most evident in the case of the Aborigines of Australia, whose "unconventional" relationship to the land is not in terms of "property" but through the Dreaming -- a sleep-related metaphor. This gave rise to the controversial, "conventional", legal assumption of Terra Nullius -- territory which has never been subject to the sovereignty of any state, or over which any prior sovereign has expressly or implicitly relinquished sovereignty.
Is it the case that the much sought comprehensive model -- the ultimate "Theory of Everything" -- will necessarily be subject to a form of copyright, somehow avoiding a requisite reframing of possessive engagement with reality? How will copyrighted metaphors constrain future global governance (Future Coping Strategies: beyond the constraints of proprietary metaphors, 1992)? The question is effectively raised by the copyrighted work of Ken Wilber (A Theory of Everything: an integral vision for business, politics, science and spirituality, 2001). In a creative era of open source initiatives, how is "a" copyrighted theory of everything to be reconciled with multiple copyrighted theories of everything (John D. Barrow, New Theories of Everything, 2008)? Might there be a hidden insight to be derived from Einstein's quest (Einstein's Implicit Theory of Relativity -- of Cognitive Property? Unexamined influence of patenting procedures, 2007)? Does the effort to copyright knowledge of "everything" imply a fundamental misunderstanding of its nature and of how it is to be apprehended?
Revolution vs. Convolution: The Steiner-Gebser-Wilber modality, as with any singular world view, implies in each case a form of "revolution" of consciousness, possibly only cognitive but necessarily with psychosocial implications. Humanity has exhibited little capacity to manage such revolutions with any skill. The singular world view, unable as it is to engage meaningfully with any alternative perspective, is obliged to marginalise and demonise it -- and seek its elimination (Designing Global Self-governance for the Future: patterns of dynamic integration of the netherworld, 2010). This pattern currently plays out on the world stage in the relationships between Christianity and Islam, between democratic and other modes of organization, and between science and religion, as previously discussed (Guidelines for Critical Dialogue between Worldviews -- as exemplified by the need for non-antisemitic dialogue with Israelis? 2006).
It is interesting therefore to consider that the missing dimension might be found in the Gödel-Escher-Bach modality. Although the "complexity sciences" have as yet to offer insight into global governance, it would appear that at least Escher and Bach -- as prototypes of the "complexity arts" -- may offer insights into the riches of cognitive "convolution" in contrast with "revolution". The contribution of the "complexity sciences" to such exploration is evident in the beauties of the visual renderings of the Mandelbrot fractal or of symmetry groups such as the Monster group or the Lie group (Psycho-social Significance of the Mandelbrot Set: a sustainable boundary between chaos and order, 2005; Potential Psychosocial Significance of Monstrous Moonshine: an exceptional form of symmetry as a Rosetta stone for cognitive frameworks, 2007).
Such convolution corresponds to the radical recursion of Steven M. Rosen (What is Radical Recursion? 2004) and to the arguments of Michael Schiltz (Form and Medium: a mathematical reconstruction, Image [&] Narrative, 6, 2003) in relation to the calculus of indications of George Spencer-Brown (Laws of Form, 1969/1994) -- as discussed separately (Beyond the plane: form and medium in terms of the calculus of indications, 2006). Aspects of the cognitive challenges of otherness may even be understood through a common experience (Snoring of The Other: a politically relevant psycho-spiritual metaphor? 2006).
Resilience in an adaptive cycle: The new organizational modality is then to be associated with a new cognitive modality built on fruitful complexity rather than the disastrous oversimplification so readily promoted in political and religious social change programmes (Consciously Self-reflexive Global Initiatives: Renaissance zones, complex adaptive systems, and third order organizations, 2007). In the case of the fundamental use made by Ken Wilber of the conveyor metaphor, the failure to recognize its necessarily "convoluted" circular dynamic has been discussed elsewhere (Potential Misuse of the Conveyor Metaphor: recognition of the circular dynamic essential to its appropriate operation, 2007). Resilience would seem to call for a mode to compensate for the value of the KISS Principle by which enthusiasts for silo thinking are naturally tempted. Hence the corrective value of the "cognitive enhancements" offered (successively?) by Bach-Escher-Gödel -- each potentially more radically challenging than the last and therefore readily to be understood as "barriers".
Ironically turbulent global conditions call for the adaptive skills associated with the kinetic intelligence of surfing and skateboarding and extreme sports rather than those geared to a sedentary perspective on the world. These may offer a key to navigation of the adaptive cycle for which humanity may be obliged to equip itself (Adaptive Hypercycle of Sustainable Psychosocial Self-organization, 2010).
Others have made use of a triadic pattern as a basis for elaboration of richer patterns. For example:
Nine muses? The ninefold pattern of Fig. 1 recalls the classical set of nine muses -- the subject of the poet Virgil's assertion: Muses love alternatives (Eclogues, Bk III) and seemingly in contrast to the pattern of a singular worldview. For a creative person, especially in the arts, the psychological significance of an inner "muse" may well be perceived as essential -- as associated with the daimon's of classical mythology. A muse might be understood as a catalyst enabling the connectivity of the "pattern that connects" -- however challenging this may be (Daimon, Djinn, Muse and Duende: variations on a timeless experience, 2007). There is a case therefore for looking at the variety of muses -- presumably eliciting different kinds or qualities of connectivity. In classical Greece and Rome, 9 such goddesses were identified as sources of inspiration in the arts and sciences (see Angeles Arrien. The Nine Muses: a mythological path to creativity. 2000).
|Muse name||Muse domain|
Whilst the nine muses are identified here in terms of aesthetic form, a classical Indian analogue, the nava rasa (or nine sentiments), emphasizes the aesthetic quality in the performing arts (music, dance, drama or poetry) that colour the mind with a particular feeling, sentiment, passion or emotion.
Religions: The pattern of Fig. 1 merits reflection when applied to the three Abrahamic religions (for example) in problematic relationship down the centuries -- and constituting a continuing challenge in relation to the influence of faith-based governance..
|Fig. 2: Pattern of ninefold interweaving applied to religion|
|.||3-fold Interweaving of the Abrahamic religions|
to singular worldviews
|Kurt Gödel||Gödel-Judaism||Gödel-Christianity||Gödel-Islam||logic||inherent incompleteness of
|M. C. Escher||Escher-Judaism||Escher-Christianity||Escher-Islam||depiction||paradoxical self-reflexivity
requiring a cognitive twist
|J. S. Bach||Bach-Judaism||Bach-Christianity||Bach-Islam||music||comprehensive exploration of
harmony in variation
Of interest in this case is a detectable degree of affinity between:
Of potentially greater interest are the distinct "flavours" with which each religion might be associated -- in contrast to Wilber's "one taste" -- and hence the manner in which they respectively function as strange attractors for those variously preferring those flavours (Human Values as Strange Attractors: coevolution of classes of governance principles, 1993).
Governance: The pattern of Fig. 1 might also be used to elicit insight of relevance to governance in the case of the the interaction between religion, science and politics.
|Fig. 3: Pattern of ninefold interweaving applied to preoccupations of governance|
|.||3-fold Interweaving of the preoccupations of governance|
to singular worldviews
|Kurt Gödel||Gödel-Religion||Gödel-Politics||Gödel-Science||logic||inherent incompleteness of
|M. C. Escher||Escher-Religion||Escher-Politics||Escher-Science||depiction||paradoxical self-reflexivity
requiring a cognitive twist
|J. S. Bach||Bach-Religion||Bach-Politics||Bach-Science||music||comprehensive exploration of
harmony in variation
Just as the "Steiner modality" (in Fig. 1) seeks to reinforce comprehension through venturing into the "Bach-Escher domains" in its exploration of the performance art of eurythmy, it is appropriate to note (with respect to Fig. 3) the various explorations by religion, politics and science of music and visualization as a means of facilitating and enhancing comprehension.
In considering issues of meta-governance, Hofstadter's consideration of strange loops has been noted by J. Kooiman (Governing as Governance, 2003):
In a democratically governed society the governed are governed by their governors, who are likewise governed by those they govern. A central meta governance question must be: how are the strange loops between governors and governed organised, and what is the quality of these arrangements This is a strange loop process, being both input and outcome at the same time. Because meta is itself a two-way interacting governing order, it is not necessarily paradoxical or contradictory to define meta governance both in terms of process and the outcome of that process (pp. 171-172)
Understanding of the world, as apprehended through the formal structure of a spreadsheet, may be seen by the future as being as inadequate as that regretted in relation to wearing of the burka by women. As an appropriate illustration, the image on the right is a screenshot of an Integrative Matrix of Human Preoccupations, described separately (Functional Classification in an Integrative Matrix of Human Preoccupations, 1982) as used to enable access to the contents of the Encyclopedia of World Problems and Human Potential. That on the left is the access to the world through a burka by the women who wear that garment.
|Correspondingly constrained views of the world?|
|Engaging with the world from within a spreadsheet||Engaging with the world from within a burka|
Wearing of the burka is widely challenged by those claiming to uphold the universal values of global civilization. The question is whether the cognitive constraints imposed by the widespread use of the spreadsheet in its various forms -- as the key aid to global governance in institutions of every kind -- are fruitfully seen as being as problematic as wearing the burka. Are leaders of the world constrained in their cognitive engagement with the world -- as many arguing the merits of post-formal discourse would argue (Paul Feyerabend, Conquest of Abundance: a tale of abstraction versus the richness of being, 1999; David Abram, The Spell of the Sensuous: perception and language in a more-than-human world, 1997; Sallie McFague, Life Abundant: rethinking theology and economy for a planet in peril, 2000).
To the extent that there is validity to the comparison, concerns relating to the burka may be seen as offering insights into the problematic consequences of dependence on the spreadsheet (Burkha as Metaphorical Mirror for Imperious Culture? 2009). Curiously the most widespread spreadsheet software application is deliberated associated with the capacity of people and institutions to "excel" -- echoing to a degree the global aspirations for human development. Equally curiously wearing the burka is associated with namus -- a form of excellence in virtue, honour and integrity.
The matrix pattern (Fig. 1) used to suggest the appropriateness of interweaving Steiner-Gebser-Wilber with Gödel-Escher-Bach is of course a characteristically simple pattern only too evident in every variety of governance and planning -- an unfortunate exemplification of the KISS Principle. In the earlier exploration of Interweaving Thematic Threads and Learning Pathways (2010) the possibilities of fruitfully complexifying such a weaving were detailed. In the discussion of Jennifer Gidley (A Macrohistorical Planetary Tapestry: the fascinating integral narratives of Steiner, Gebser and Wilber, 2007) the value of a fourth dimension was introduced. Understood as time, such a dimension merits extensive "re-cognition" with respect to governance and planetary development (Strategic Embodiment of Time: configuring questions fundamental to change, 2010; The Isdom of the Wisdom Society Embodying time as the heartland of humanity, 2003).
A potentially fruitful exercise is to explore the possibility of "enrolling" each matrix (Fig. 1, Fig. 2 or Fig. 3) by cognitively "bonding" together the opposite ends of the matrix, such that the last column is juxtaposed with the first to form a cylinder, and the top row is juxtaposed with the bottom row to bend the cylinder into a torus. The argument for doing so has been made separately (Comprehension of Requisite Variety for Sustainable Psychosocial Dynamics: transforming a matrix classification onto intertwined tori, 2006). The possibility was envisaged in relation to conventional tabular categorizations of human needs (Needs Communication: viable need patterns and their identification, 1980).
The possibility and relevance of such transformation of categories has been variously explored in relation to the sphere (Spherical Accounting: using geometry to embody developmental integrity, 2004; Spherical configuration of interlocking roundtables: Internet enhancement of global self-organization through patterns of dialogue, 1998; Spherical Configuration of Categories to Reflect Systemic Patterns of Environmental Checks and Balances, 1994).
The process of enrolling the matrix into a torus -- geometrically of the same family as the sphere -- may be undertaken in two alternative ways suggestive of further insight.
|Phase 1: Enrolling (Fig. 1) matrix into a cylinder
by joining opposite "sides"
|Phase 2: Connecting ends of cylinder by
bending it to form a torus
|-- engaging with "the other"
-- embodying the circle as a symbol of the whole
|-- "the first shall be last and the last first"
-- getting ends to meet (Ouroboros)
|-- self-referential "re-cognition"||-- embodiment as a strange loop|
|Phase 1: Enrolling (Fig. 1) matrix into a cylinder
by joining "top" and "bottom"
|Phase 2: Connecting ends of cylinder by
bending it to form a torus
|-- "first shall be last and the last first"
-- getting ends to meet (Ouroboros)
|-- engaging with "the other"
-- embodying the circle as a symbol of the whole
|-- embodiment as a strange loop||-- self-referential "re-cognition"|
It is potentially of interest in that in the case of both alternatives, a torus can also be formed by stretching the circumference at each end of the cylinder and curling each such that they meet.
From a cultural perspective the looping is extensively explored in the work of religious historian Mircea Eliade, and his successors, on eternal return (The Myth of the Eternal Return: cosmos and history, 1971). The cognitive implications are poignantly articulated by the poet T. S. Eliot (Little Gidding, 1942) to the effect that:
We shall not cease from exploration
And the end of all our exploring
Will be to arrive where we started
And know it for the first time.
The torus form may be fruitfully related to that of the traditional bi disk of Chinese culture and the fundamental symbolism associated with it -- heaven and earth-like imagery. Also of potential relevance in framing the dynamics of a torus-like periphery, in relation to a centre losing the function primitively accorded to it, is the insight of W. B. Years (The Second Coming, 1920):
Turning and turning in the widening gyre
However these lines call for reinterpretation where they imply forms of control from the centre and by the centre whereas the bi disk symbolizes the insight of the Tao Te Ching (as quoted above) regarding the pre-eminent value that may be accorded to the emptiness of the centre.
A search of the images regarding "torus", accessible on the web through Google, offers many visual variations of relevance to the above argument -- notably those in which the columns (or rows) of the above matrix are variously coloured and twisted. As previously discussed and illustrated (Comprehension of Requisite Variety for Sustainable Psychosocial Dynamics: transforming a matrix classification onto intertwined tori, 2006), intertwining the two differently oriented tori offers geometrical support for the cognitive implications of the alternates (Interlocking tori: combining the two alternative representations, 2006).
|Screen shots of a dynamic virtual
reality model of intertwined tori
Access to the animations of the tori moving in relation to each other is available via the original paper (Dynamics of interlocked tori, 2006)
|Red torus has a vortex (smoke ring) dynamic in the model|
|Blue torus has a wheel-like dynamic in the model|
Such intertwining readily recalls the interweaving of DNA strands and its fundamental importance to biology and reproduction (DNA Supercoiling as a Pattern for Understanding Psycho-social Twistedness, 2004; Climbing Elven Stairways: DNA as a macroscopic metaphor of polarized psychodynamics, 2007). If "supercoiling" is so essentially vital as a pattern, is it possible that such "convolution" is vital to an integrative future (Self-reflexive Challenges of Integrative Futures, 2008). Ironically DNA may also offer new insight into the psychosocial challenges of intellectual "copyright".
The ninefold pattern used in Fig. 1, and the threefold patterns from which it was derived, are not to be considered as "set in stone". Both Gidley and Hofstadter readily cite other authors of relevance. With respect to the evolution of consciousness, Gidley acknowledges other pioneers whom she variously cites: Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, Henri Bergson, Erich Neumann, Sri Aurobindo, Ervin László, Edgar Morin, Ashok Gangadean, Robert MacDermott, Richard Tarnas, Basarab Nicolescu, Alfonso Montuori, Peter Russell, and Brian Swimme.
In each case Hofstadter and Gidley have effectively made a "design choice" for purposes of comprehensible communication. Had they considered a much larger number, many issues of comprehension would have arisen. The implications of such selection of sets have been explored more generally (Representation, Comprehension and Communication of Sets: the role of number, 1979). Many examples have also been considered (Examples of Integrated, Multi-set Concept Schemes, 1984) in relation to Patterns of N-foldness; comparison of integrated multi-set concept schemes as forms of presentation (1984).
Of interest with respect to the ninefold matrix is how it might be "extended" in either case and what might be the case for doing so -- or not doing so. Thus, for example:
The "patterns" of such extensions -- as designs -- may be explored through the metaphor of cognitive "magic carpets" (Magic Carpets as Psychoactive System Diagrams, 2010; Harmony-Comprehension and Wholeness-Engendering eliciting psychosocial transformational principles from design, 2010).
With respect to the approaches to governance thereby enabled a case can be made for considering any chosen (square) matrix as indicative of an interactive game between integrative perspectives variously challenged thereby (Designing Global Self-governance for the Future, 2010). These "games" could then themselves be integrated within a comprehensible scheme for which the Fibonacci spiral was used as an example (Tao of Engagement -- Weaponised Interactions and Beyond: Fibonacci's magic carpet of games to be played for sustainable global governance, 2010). An argument can also be made for exploring geometric variations in a playful mode -- inspired by the possibilities of music, as notably explored by Bach (Enacting Transformative Integral Thinking through Playful Elegance, 2010). As previously noted, there is a case for "liberating" approaches to integration (Liberation of Integration, Universality and Concord -- through pattern, oscillation, harmony and embodiment, 1980). A "musical addendum" to that paper, in relation to Hofstadter's argument regarding insights from the fugues of Bach, concluded with the question:
Could it be that one dimension of the challenge of socio-political integration is illustrated by the problem of interrelating seemingly hostile or incompatible "voices". And that counterproposals and counterarguments need to be set in a larger context to which we are as yet insensitive? And does the time dimension over which arguments and counterarguments are developed need to be better understood in terms of an integrated socio-political process? (Fugitive Integration, 1982)
In the quest for "harmony", a musical metaphor may be used in relation to a more extensive "matrix" of human beliefs as argued separately in the light of the insights offered by the periodic table of elements (Tuning a Periodic Table of Religions, Epistemologies and Spirituality -- including the sciences and other belief systems, 2007; Periodic Pattern of Human Knowing implication of the Periodic Table as metaphor of elementary order, 2009). The harmony sought for global governance may indeed benefit to an unsuspected degree from intuitive appreciation of music (A Singable Earth Charter, EU Constitution or Global Ethic? 2006).
Both the musical and periodic table metaphors point to possibilities of reclustering the elements of a set. In music this is a question of different tuning systems. In the case of the periodic table this is a question of clustering "elements" into different groups. In either case different patterns of distinction are made -- possibly in playful experimentation (Engaging with Globality through Playful Re-categorizing, 2009). "Integration" of cognitive relevance might even emerge from "chords" (Polarities as Pluckable Tensed Strings: Hypercomprehension through harmonics of value-based choice-making, 2006). Arguably extension of the Gödel-Escher-Bach modalities might then be understood in terms of different "ways of knowing" or "intelligences" (as with the multiple intelligences explored by Howard Gardner). This suggests an alternative way of thinking of the "faculties" of a university and their subject matter.
Although a case can be made for exploring the "extension" of the number of columns and rows of Fig. 1, the merit of doing so could usefully be seen in terms of requisite variety -- especially in its implications for governance as understood in cybernetic terms. Specifically how different do the functions of such rows or columns need to be and how is such meaningful difference to be determined -- possibly through the emerging disciplines of knowledge cybernetics and the cybernetics of human knowing? Much is made of the viability of a gene pool but little is considered with respect to the vital requirements for the viability of a cultural "meme pool" -- especially to avoid civilizational collapse (Jared Diamond, Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed, 2005).
Missing from the rows and columns as they stand is any sense of that variety, especially if each is understood as problematically "other" to the others. In Maruyama's terms, in arguing for "polyocular vision", the question is how many complementary "eyes" are necessary for sustainable governance (Polyocular Vision or Subunderstanding, Organization Studies, 2004). His exclusive use of the vision metaphor -- so common in governance -- is further challenged by the possible requirement for polysensorial variety (Strategic Challenge of Polysensorial Knowledge: bringing the "elephant" into "focus", 2008; Cyclopean Vision vs Poly-sensual Engagement, 2006)
As integral schemes, it could be argued that such variety is (at least to a degree) implicitly embodied within the schemes of Wilber, Gebser and Steiner. Wilber distinguishes types and phases by colours, for example. However the "colour" of "his" integral scheme as a whole, from the perspective of any other scheme, is not evident within that pattern -- reinforcing the argument regarding what may be the necessary lack of self-reference of such singular schemes. In their claims to encompass the sweep of the evolution of human consciousness, the insights of macrohistory merit consideration as noted by Gidley. In that respect, the case for multiple perspectives is partially addressed by Johan Galtung and Sohail Inayatullah (Macrohistory and Macrohistorians: perspectives on individual, social and civilizational change, 1997).
Inspired by the mathematical literature on "moonshine" connectivity -- in the spirit of the Gidley-Deleusian lines of flight -- there is an intriguing possibility of a form of "moonshine correspondence" (of relevance to gobal governance) to be discovered between:
The fundamental pattern of packing of the variety of regular polyhedra [applet], notably its implication for comprehension may be distinctly associated with qualities in human cognition, as represented by the Dodekatheon (for example). Their aesthetic distinctions may effectively encode an unsuspected role as fundamental (strange) attractors. For a civilization labelled "unconscious" by John Ralston Saul (The Unconscious Civilization, 1995), failure to explore the possible hidden cognitive influences of such patterns may serve significantly to perpetuate their more problematic dynamics (Generic Reframing of the 12 Tribes of "Israel", 2009; Web resources on "breaking the cycle", 2002).
The case was made above for "enrolling the matrix" to hold significance more adequately. A further intriguing possibility emerges from recognition of the extent to which the "rows" and "columns" are in a sense artificially distinguished in that elements (or "colours") of those two dimensions feature in the other -- and possibly increasingly so with any "extension" to achieve requisite variety. Is there a sense in which such reciprocal embodiment should be interpreted as a form of fractal organization? Rather than the set of rows and the set of columns being understood as distinct "sides", is requisite variety associated with recognition that their distinction is paradoxically better held as the single "side" of a Mobius strip variously perceived?
The charming reference, mentioned above, to the significance of that strip by Sam C. Ziegler (A Cloud thats Dragonish: a description of the possible evidence of use of the Mobius Strip in pre-modern times, 2009) may even be interpreted as implying that a viable future for global governance is best understood as "dragonish". Furthermore, his "cloud" metaphor his possibly entirely appropriate given the extent to which the knowledge of the global knowledge society is now held "on the cloud". Ironically Hofstadter, in introducing his discussion of strange loops, makes use of a classic Peanuts cartoon regarding what can be perceived in clouds.
In her magnificent review of the Steiner-Gebser-Wilber trilogy, Jennifer Gidley (The Evolution of Consciousness as a Planetary Imperative: an integration of integral views. Integral Review: A Transdisciplinary and Transcultural Journal for New Thought, Research and Praxis, 2007) gives focus to her intention in the following terms:
... the intent of my own integrality is not so much in detailing and mapping integral concepts -- which Wilber has done so extensively -- rather to enliven them. I hope to nurture and transpare the living imaginations of the Zeitgeist shining through the concepts of integral awakening in our time.
Again this points to the need for additional rows in Fig. 1, relating not only to the issue of comprehension but to the manner in which the columns are enlivening and enactivating -- or not, as they are experienced by many. Gidley has a specific concern with enactivating integrality, notably by reference to Sri Aurobindo's integral project:
I have chosen to focus primarily on the theoretic narratives contributed to the evolution of consciousness discourse by Steiner, Gebser and Wilber. In this way, I am enacting a conscious bias, by privileging narratives that have formerly been marginalized in the evolution discourse.... Furthermore, I am confident that my methodology, particularly the hermeneutic contextualization, provides a means of buffering the bias I am deliberately enacting, by making it explicit.... In the main narrative I will be enacting a narrative writing style that deliberately weaves conceptual reasoning with imagination, though from a post-rational mythopoetic rather than a pre-rational mythic stance.
With respect to the challenges of cognitive engagement, as it might relate to global governance, Gidley intimates (notably citing Gebser) that the domain of art -- or aesthetic sensibility -- may be a more fruitful starting point for the creation of a new panhuman narrative for an authentically integral-planetary consciousness. (p. 200).
In the light of explorations of enactivism as a process in the psychosocial construction of reality, this may fruitfully be related to the "pattern that connects" as highlighted by Gregory Bateson, and previously discussed (Walking Elven Pathways: enactivating the pattern that connects, 2006; Hyperspace Clues to the Psychology of the Pattern that Connects, 2003; Designing Cultural Rosaries and Meaning Malas to Sustain Associations within the Pattern that Connects, 2000). As stated by Bateson (Mind and Nature: a necessary unity, 1979)
The pattern which connects is a meta-pattern. It is a pattern of patterns. It is that meta-pattern which defines the vast generalization that, indeed, it is patterns which connect.
And it is from this perspective that he warns in a much-cited phrase: Break the pattern which connects the items of learning and you necessarily destroy all quality. The "threading" of beads in circlets of spiritual significance -- or their cultural importance as "worry beads" -- then implies a "meta-thread", perhaps as having been celebrated by Hofstadter's Metamagical Themas (1985).
The challenge for governance is how to embody that meta-pattern. One possibility is that the meta-pattern can be usefully mapped onto symmetrical polyhedra as a key to comprehension and mnemonic reinforcement (Topology of Valuing: psychodynamics of collective engagement with polyhedral value configurations, 2008).
There is a weakness to the tapestry metaphor to the extent that it reinforces the current bias in governance towards use of the vision metaphor in articulating future strategy. Tapestries, whatever the beauty of their weaving, are designed to be "looked at" -- however successfully they enable remembrance. As noted above, this is evident in the failure to take account of the forms of intelligence associated with other sensual metaphors (Strategic Challenge of Polysensorial Knowledge: bringing the "elephant" into "focus", 2008; Cyclopean Vision vs Poly-sensual Engagement, 2006). Also as noted, there is the further challenge that they are not designed to facilitate forms of cognitive embodiment potentially essential to governance in the future. Such weavings are not designed to be "donned" through being formed into cognitive clothing adapted for engagement with the elements.
The importance to governance of cultivating strategic "narratives" has effectively been widely recognized -- especially by politically parties, even as the essence of spin. Intimately associated with such narratives are the metaphors which give coherence to them (Metaphoric Revolution: in quest of a manifesto for governance through metaphor, 1988). In this sense sustainable governance may be understood as the challenge of how to ride the sustaining metaphor through which its coherence is recognized and with which people can engage. Metaphors thereby become the vehicle of requisite transdisciplinarity (Metaphors as Transdisciplinary Vehicles of the Future, 1991). Threats to sustainable governance may even be framed in such terms (The "Dark Riders" of Social Change: a challenge for any Fellowship of the Ring, 2002).
With respect to the integral argument, as an economist and key instigator in the emergence of general systems research, Kenneth Boulding (Ecodynamics; a new theory of societal evolution, 1978) offers the following insight into the relevance of such metaphor:
Our consciousness of the unity of self in the middle of a vast complexity of images or material structures is at least a suitable metaphor for the unity of group, organization, department, discipline or science. If personification is a metaphor, let us not despise metaphors -- we might be one ourselves.
In any tapestry as envisaged by Gidley, the concern is the strategic identification with a given thread, even that of a recognizable colour. To what degree does a strategy "become the metaphor" -- as with calls to "be the change"? There is a sense in which strongly advocated paths of governance -- as guiding threads of meaning -- are embodied in ways yet to be fruitfully understood. It implies a degree of self-reference. Indeed, whether fruitful or problematic, styles of governance may be understood as their own metaphor -- following the argument of Gregory Bateson that "we are our own metaphor" (as cited by Mary Catherine Bateson, Our Own Metaphor: a personal account of a conference on the effects of conscious purpose on human adaptation, 1972). The context of this citation reinforces the link to Gidley's exploration of the evolution of consciousness.
Given the emphasis placed above on cognitive exploitation of increasingly complex geometry, strategic "paths" are readily to be understood as linear -- however they are supported by threads of argument. Aside from the possibility of interweaving lines into a tapestry, also intriguing is the cognitive possibility of bending such pathways into "rings" potentially isomorphic with the challenges of navigation and governance of any adaptive cycle. This has been variously argued (Designing Cultural Rosaries and Meaning Malas to Sustain Associations within the Pattern that Connects, 2000; Engaging with Globality through Cognitive Circlets, 2009; Adaptive Hypercycle of Sustainable Psychosocial Self-organization, 2010). Such possibilities may be related to the review of "ring composition" by Anthony Blake (Decoding the Past: ring composition and sacred number) and notably the study by Mary Douglas (Thinking in Circles: an essay in ring composition, 2007).
Geometrical complexification: Curiously the threaded "beads" of rosaries and mala circlets even offer a reminder of the significance of the torus with which meaning has been associated in the above argument. The cognitive significance of interlocking (or interweaving) rings can be explored as a further stage in fruitful geometrical complexification (Engaging with Globality through Cognitive Crowns, 2010) -- a stage prior to that of the Klein bottle and its paradoxes (Engaging with Globality through Knowing Thyself, 2010). In such a metaphor, it is the thread --understood as threading the circlet of beads together -- that holds a larger significance.
Psychosocial energy: Such arguments point to the possibility that greater recognition could usefully be given to the manner in which sustainable governance is necessarily a channel for the "psychic energy" of populations -- understood as Zeitgeist, motivation or otherwise (Reframing Sustainable Sources of Energy for the Future: the vital role of psychosocial variants, 2006). This energy might in future even be associated with the problematic dynamics of polarization (Psychosocial Energy from Polarization: within a cyclic pattern of enantiodromia, 2007).
Embodiment of form: Much seemingly remains to be discovered about how collectivities embody insight in relation to their governance, as implied by the arguments of various authors, although more especially in relation to the individual (George Lakoff and Mark Johnson, Philosophy In The Flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to western thought, 1999; Francisco Varela, Evan Thompson and Eleanor Roach. The Embodied Mind: cognitive science and human expression, 1991). The argument for embodiment beyond "vision" can be developed in relation to strategic scenarios (Stepping into, or through, the Mirror: embodying alternative scenario patterns, 2008).
A radical expression of any such strategic embodiment is the Buddhist phrase adopted by Francisco Varela (Laying down a path in walking. In: W. Thompson (Ed.), Gaia: a way of knowing, 1987). This is hopefully to be radically contrasted with the common accusation that governments "make up policies as they go along". The argument has been variously explored and developed in the following:
Together such factors make a case for consciously self-reflexive governance (Consciously Self-reflexive Global Initiatives: Renaissance zones, complex adaptive systems, and third order organizations, 2007).
As noted, Gidley's focus on Steiner-Gebser-Wilber forms part of her wider focus on The Evolution of Consciousness as a Planetary Imperative (2007). To that end, the argument above suggests the intriguing possibility of interrelating the following themes:
To the extent that these may be usefully recognized as isomorphic features of the "evolution" or complexification of systems in general, it can then be fruitfully asked whether such "emptying" is a possible prelude to a more complex psychosocial form. Of notable relevance is the manner in which forms of organization, tending to escape the control of governance as currently framed, are often named in terms of "rings" -- crime rings, drug rings, spy rings, carousel fraud, etc -- implying the emergence of a more complex topology to which governance is currently not adapted.
Invagination of society? As a topological process, invagination in the embryonic transition in biological development is especially suggestive if only as a metaphor. It is described the morphogenetic processes by which an embryo takes form, and is the initial step of gastrulation, the massive reorganization of the embryo from a simple spherical ball of cells, the blastula, into a multi-layered organism, with differentiated germ layers: endoderm, mesoderm, and ectoderm. Is the current understanding of "global civilization" to be compared to the blastula from which a "multi-layered organism" has yet to emerge -- following "massive reorganization"?
Does this offer a way of reflecting on psychosocial maturation and the evolution of civilizations in the sense explored by Gidley?
The term invagination may well offer two sets of helpful associations:
Taken together -- as with the formation of the digestive tract in the biological case -- the two directions of development meet forming a tube. This is effectively a "hole" through the original spherical cluster of cells -- effectively engendering a torus. Does this indeed correspond to the insight of W. B. Yeats -- the centre cannot hold -- as it might apply to governance of a global population? The pressures of "growth" and "consumption", and the dependence on them within the current global model -- as so frequently articulated and critiqued -- might then be said to be in process of engendering topological consequences implicit within the efforts to adapt to those trends. The analysis of energy needs and sourcing within the Roman Empire by Thomas Homer-Dixon is suggestive of an approach to clarifying such "topological pressures" (The Upside of Down: Catastrophe, Creativity, and the Renewal of Civilization, 2006).
Topology of volition? The argument here is that this process is occurring at the psychosocial level in the topology of collective organization -- so commonly symbolized by the spherical ideal of global completion. In a sense it may be understood as an adaptive development in the expression of "volition" -- of the political will so often desperately sought with respect to governance.
Exploiting the etymological potential of Gidley's use of the poetic Deleusian phrase of conceptual lines of flight between the three narratives she considers, a case could be made for recognizing the root concept in the following terms, namely "vol". Rather than "Revolution vs. Convolution", as suggested above, or the case made by Gidley for "Evolution", is it more significantly a case of "Revolition vs. Convolition" and "Evolition" -- whatever such neologisms might then fruitfully signify?
Especially intriguing is the manner in which "revolition" is then reminiscent of the "resolution" which is the primary focus of governance in most international institutions in endeavouring to elicit and focus political will. Does "revolition" imply a mode of cognition missing from the "resolutions" -- which might rightly be judged as having proven themselves not fit for purpose, offering neither "solution" nor "resolve"? The possibility of "convolition" as a collective process may well depend on the kind of cognitive "convolution" highlighted by Hofstadter.
Whilst the prefix "e" may appear questionable, it is appropriate to note its widespread use as an expression of qualitative appreciation in "emeritus" -- even then to be construed as a recognition of a degree of wisdom. "Evolition" might then suggestive of a richer form of volition, possibly consistent with the self-referential arguments of Hofstadter and his sense of the evolution of consciousness. Gidley's concern with education in enabling such evolution might even be challenged in terms of its etymological origins as "e-ducare" with its implicit reference to leadership -- from the centre?
The original sense of the evolution of human consciousness in terms of the noosphere by Pierre Teilhard de Chardin and Vladimir Vernadsky has previously been reframed in terms of the internet and planetary consciousness (From Information Highways to Songlines of the Noosphere: global configuration of hypertext pathways as a prerequisite for meaningful collective transformation, 1996). However, from the above, it would appear there is a case for reframing such use of a "sphere" in toroidal terms. Might it be more meaningful to represent "global" mappings of both internet traffic and content organization on toroidal surfaces?
Is there then a case for exploring a "nootorus" as an emergent phase in the "evolition" of human consciousness? How might this correspond to the arguments made for the emergence of a "cognitively distinct" species with whose members intercourse would be "unfruitful" (Authentic Grokking: Emergence of Homo conjugens, 2003)? Is such a strange loop then to be understood by the future as a "missing link" in the process of evolition? What then of the "songlines of the nootorus"?
The future may consider it strange that civilization should in this period of crisis be focused on its globality and its globalization when these are intimately associated with the essentially static geometry of the planet as a sphere. The fact that the sphere engages in diurnal "revolutions" is not evident in conventional use of the global metaphor -- revolution being itself a challenging process to governance. It is also strange that a widely lauded book by Thomas L. Friedman (The World Is Flat, 2005) should endeavour to reframe such globality in a seemingly retrogressive fashion, as criticized elsewhere (Irresponsible Dependence on a Flat Earth Mentality -- in response to global governance challenges, 2008).
The argument above may however be extended in that it is indeed a fact that the planet traces out a torus in its annual rotation around the Sun -- a cycle to which many environmental and institutional reporting cycles are geared. There is therefore at least a case for considering that a more appropriate geometrical framework for humanity's "global civilization" is as a "toroidal civilization" -- honouring the dynamic in which the static is embedded. The process of "globalization" and concerns with "sustainability" might then be more fruitfully considered in terms of "toroidalization" -- as dynamic processes over time (Strategic Embodiment of Time: configuring questions fundamental to change, 2010).
Of relevance is the programme of research proposed by Christopher Alexander (Harmony-Seeking Computations: a science of non-classical dynamics based on the progressive evolution of the larger whole, International Journal for Unconventional Computing , 2009) following his major study of order as it can be recognized in nature (The Nature of Order: an essay on the art of building and the nature of the universe, 2003-4). Alexander strongly emphasizes beauty, in terms of "ring-like structures", as a driver to 'wholeness-extending' -- qualifying conventional understandings of the 'attractor' of complexity theory as follows
Rather, I suspect that there are, deep in geometry of space, reasons why ring-like structures with this kind of ratio are likely to occur. In current jargon, rings of this particular ratio might be viewed as attractors in some phase space. However, the discovery of geometric attractors in the solutions to systems of dynamic equations is, in my view, only one particular manifestation of the far more general harmony-seeking computations that occur naturally in three-dimensional space.
The implications of Alexander's work have been discussed separately (Harmony-Comprehension and Wholeness-Extending: eliciting psychosocial transformational principles from design, 2010). Although Gidley presents a variety of illustrations of aesthetic principles, and refers to sacred geometry, she does not appear to take account of the projective geometry inspired by Steiner (Olive Whicher, Projective Geometry: creative polarities in space and time, 1971) or make much of the spiral dynamics associated with the work of Wilber (D. E. Beck and C. C Cowan. Spiral Dynamics: mastering values, leadership and change, 1996). It is unclear that Steiner, Gebser or Wilber engage with geometry through the topological paradoxes central to Hofstadter's exploration of strange loops. Wilber's questionable use of the geometry and dynamics of the conveyor metaphor has been separately discussed (Potential Misuse of the Conveyor Metaphor: Recognition of the circular dynamic essential to its appropriate operation, 2007).
More significant to the cognitive implications for governance of the transition from sphere to torus is the mathematical work of Ron Atkin (Multidimensional Man; can man live in 3-dimensional space? 1981; Combinatorial Connectivities in Social Systems; an application of simplicial complex structures to the study of large organizations, 1977). This has been separately summarized (Social organization determined by incommunicability of insights, 1995). As indicated in that summary, of great interest is the manner in which communication within a group is constrained to move "around" an unmentioned "object" or "hole" in the geometry -- a process which Atkin analyzes in the communication processes amongst academics in a university. This circular dynamic is reminiscent of the dynamics essential to the stability of a smoke-ring and seemingly characteristic of strategic development (Lipoproblems: developing a strategy omitting a key problem. 2009).
Of interest is then the contrasting implication of use of the geometrical metaphor of the circle:
|Potential application of Faraday's Law of Induction to governance?|
Curiously, but perhaps predictably, the only application of a toroidal approach to governance was that noted by Nicholas Ind and Rune Bjerke (Branding Governance: a participatory approach to the brand building process, 2007) namely the Double Vortex Model of L. de Cernatony and Riley F. Dall'Olmo (Defining a "brand": beyond the literature with experts' interpretations, Journal of Marketing Management, 14, 1998, pp. 417-443). Various examples of governance have however been caricatured pejoratively as constituing a vortex (Anthony Watts, Video from the Copenhagen Climate Vortex, 12 December 2009; Karuna Sarup-Munshi, Values Swirl in the Vortex of Virtues, Sai World News, July 2008; Abdullahi Dool, The Vortex Leadership Issue of Somalia, Hiiraan Online, 21 March 2008). Especially relevant to the above argument is the study by James H. Mittelman (Whither Globalization?: the vortex of knowledge and ideology, 2004). Few make fruitful use of the metaphor (The Community Intelligence Innovation Architecture: how to jump-start and sustain a vortex of innovation). One such is Vortex-WINDS (A Virtual Organization to Reduce the Toll of Extreme Winds on Society).
Figures such as those above point to the possibility of distinguishing and configuring:
Note: The aesthetic aspects of this argument are developed in a separate document, effectively an annex (Sustaining a Community of Strange Loops: comprehension and engagement through aesthetic ring transformation, 2010). A different approach to the argument has been developed in a subsequent paper (Enabling Governance through the Dynamics of Nature: exemplified by cognitive implication of vortices and helicoidal flow, 2010).
David Abram. The Spell of the Sensuous: perception and language in a more-than-human world. Random House, 1997
Karen Armstrong. A Short History of Myth. Melbourne, Canongate, 2005
John D. Barrow. New Theories of Everything. Oxford University Press, 2008
Gregory Bateson. Mind and Nature: a necessary unity. Hampton Press, 1979
Gregory Bateson and Mary Catherine Bateson. Angels Fear: towards an epistemology of the sacred. University of Chicago Press, 1988
Mary Catherine Bateson. Composing a Life. Dutton, 1990
D. E. Beck and Chris C. Cowan. Spiral Dynamics: mastering values, leadership and change. Blackwell, 1996
J. G. Bennett. The Dramatic Universe. 1970, 4 vols. [summary]
J. G. Bennett and Anthony Blake. Systematics: A New Technique In Thinking. 1966 [text]
Michael Caley and D Sawada (Eds). Mindscapes: the epistemologies of Magoroh Maruyama. Gordon and Breach, 1994
Joseph Campbell. The Inner Reaches of Outer Space: metaphor as myth and as religion. New World Library, 1986 [review]
Joseph Campbell and Bill Moyers. The Power of Myth, Anchor, 1988 [summary]
James P. Carse. Finite and Infinite Games: a vision of life as play and possibility, Ballantine Books, 1994 [summary]
Vernon E. Cronen, Kenneth M. Johnson and John W. Lannamann. Paradoxes, Double Binds, and Reflexive Loops: an alternative theoretical perspective. Family Process, 21, 1982, pp. 91-112 [abstract]
Antonio de Nicolas. Meditations through the Rg Veda. Shambhala, 1978
Joël de Rosnay. The Macroscope: a new world view. Harper and Row, 1979 [text]
Jared Diamond. Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. Viking Books, 2005 [summary]
Mary Douglas. Thinking in Circles: an essay in ring composition, Yale University Press, 2007
Mircea Eliade. The Myth of the Eternal Return: cosmos and history. Princeton University Press, 1971
Warwick Fox. Toward a Transpersonal Ecology: developing new foundations for environmentalism. Resurgence Book, 1995
Harvey Friedman. Boolean Relation Theory and Incompleteness. 2010
R. Buckminster Fuller with E. J. Applewhite. Synergetics: explorations in the gometry of thinking. Macmillan, 1975 [text]
Johan Galtung and Sohail Inayatullah (Eds). Macrohistory and Macrohistorians: perspectives on individual, social and civilizational change. Praeger, 1997 [review]
Peter Harries-Jones. A Recursive Vision: ecological understanding and Gregory Bateson. University of Toronto Press, 1995
Edward Haskell. Generalization of the Structure of Mendeleev's periodic table. In: E. Haskell (Ed.), Full Circle: The Moral Force of Unified Science. New York, Gordon and Breach, 1972 [text]
Jeffrey Hopkins. Meditation on Emptiness. Wisdom Publications, 1996
Nicholas Ind and Rune Bjerke. Branding Governance: a participatory approach to the brand building process. John Wiley and Sons, 2007
Valeria Isaeva, Eugene Presnov and Alexey Chernyshev. Topological Patterns in Metazoan Evolution and Development. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 68, 2006, pp. 2053-2067
Harald Jockusch and Andreas Dress:
Carl G. Jung. Seven Sermons to the Dead. 1916 [summary]
J. Kooiman. Governing as Governance. Sage, 2003
Uriah Kriegel and Kenneth Williford (Eds). Self-Representational Approaches to Consciousness. MIT Press, 2006 [summary]
George Lakoff and Mark Johnson:
Stephen B. Land. Strange Loops and Tangled Hierarchies. Tax Law Review, Fall 1993. 53 [abstract]
Jean-Louis Le Moigne and Edgar H. Sibley. Information - Organization - Decision: some strange loops. Information and Management, 11, 5, December 1986, pp. 237-244 [doi]
Warren Linds. Drama Facilitation: Twisting and Turning in 'Strange Loops'. Proceedings of the 2005 Complexity Science and Educational Research Conference
Sallie McFague. Life Abundant: rethinking theology and economy for a planet in peril (Searching for a New Framework). Augsburg Fortress Publishers, 2000
Alessandro Minelli. Forms of Becoming: the evolutionary biology of development. Princeton University Press, 2009 (ch. 3: Easy Numbers, Forbidden Numbers)
James H. Mittelman. Whither Globalization?: the vortex of knowledge and ideology. Routledge, 2004
Thomas Moore. The Planets Within: The Astrological Psychology of Marsilio Ficino. Lindisfarne Books 1990
Vasily V. Nalimov:
Christine Oliver, Marilyn Herasymowych and Henry Senko. Complexity, Relationships, and Strange Loops: reflexive practice guide. MHA Institute, 2003
Fred L. Polak. The Image of the Future. Jossey-Bass, 1973 [text]
David H. Porter. Ring-composition in Classical Literature and Contemporary Music. The Classical World, 65. September 1971, 1 [abstract]
Darrell A. Posey (Editor). Cultural and Spiritual Values of Biodiversity: a complementary contribution to Global Biodiversity Assessment, Intermediate Technology, 1999 (for the United Nations Environment Programme)
Franz Josef Radermacher:
Steven M. Rosen:
Theodore Roszak, Mary E. Gomes and Allend D. Kanner (Eds.). Ecopsychology: restoring the Earth, healing the mind. Sierra Club Books, 1995
John Ralston Saul. The Unconscious Civilization. House of Anansi Press, 1995
Michael A. Sells. Mystical Languages of Unsaying. University of Chicago Press, 1994 [contents]
Henryk Skolimowski. The Participatory Mind: a new theory of knowledge and of the universe. Arkana 1995 [review]
Conrad Wesley Snyder. Strange Loops in Education: problems for planning and progress. Harvard Institute for International Development, 1999
F. Streng. Emptiness: a study of religious meaning. Abingdon Press, 1967.
Mark C. Taylor. Strange Loops. In: The Moment of Complexity: emerging network culture. University of Chicago Press, 2003
William Irwin Thompson:
Geshe Tashi Tsering and Lama Zopa Rinpoche. Emptiness: the foundation of Buddhist Though., Wisdom Publications, 2009
Francisco Varela, Evan Thompson and Eleanor Roach. The Embodied Mind: cognitive science and human expression. MIT Press, 1991
Olive Whicher. Projective Geometry: creative polarities in space and time. Rudolf Steiner Press, 1971
Janet Wiles, James Watson, Bradley Tonkes and Terrence Deacon. Strange Loops in Learning and Evolution. [doi]
Colin Wilson. The Strength to Dream: literature and the imagination. Abacus, 1976
David C. Wood. Thinking Eccentrically about Time: the strange loops of Escher and Calvino. In: Time after Time. Indiana University Press, 2007
Maurice Yolles. Knowledge Cybernetics: a new metaphor for social collectives. Intellect, 3, 2006 [text]
Maurice Yolles and Paul Iles. The Knowledge Cybernetics of Culture: the case of China. International Journal of Knowledge and Systems Sciences, 3, 4, December 2006 [text]
Maurice Yolles and Zude Ye. From Knowledge Cybernetics to Feng Shui. 2005 [text]
For further updates on this site, subscribe here